journal article·2015-07-28Open access

Identifying the stress–strain curve of materials by microimpact testing. Application on pure copper, pure iron, and aluminum alloy 6061-T651

Halim Al Baida, Cécile Langlade, Guillaume Kermouche, Ricardo Rafael Ambriz

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 30· Issue 14

Abstract

The mechanical response of materials under repeated impact loading is of primary importance to model different types of surface mechanical treatments, such as shot peening. A reverse identification method of stress–strain curves using repeated impact has been developed by Kermouche et al. [Kermouche et al.,Mater. Sci. Eng., A569, 71–77 (2013)] and later improved by Al Baida et al. [Al Baida et al.,Mech. Mater.86, 11–20 (2015)]. This study deals with the experimental validation of this method on three materials: a home-made pure iron, a commercially pure copper, and an industrial aluminum alloy. An approximate method derived from cone indentation theory to check the reverse method reliability. Balls of different sizes have been used to cover a wide enough range of strain. The results are also compared with macroscopic compression and traction tests. The effect of the strain rate on the stress–strain curve is discussed. The conclusion section highlights the rapidity and the ease of use of the reverse identification method.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1757-899X/63/1/01212410.1088/1757-899X/63/1/012124 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.00110.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.001 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.479348110.1063/1.4793481 ↗
4. 10.1098/rspa.1989.005610.1098/rspa.1989.0056 ↗
6. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.08110.1016/j.msea.2008.09.081 ↗
8. 10.1007/BF0232622610.1007/BF02326226 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.01610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.016 ↗
10. 10.1002/978047017227810.1002/9780470172278 ↗
11. 2011
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.08010.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.080 ↗
14. Compression tests of polycrystalline α-iron up to high strains over a large range of strain rates
15. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
16. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0041-624X(98)00027-410.1016/S0041-624X(98)00027-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01228-610.1016/S0924-0136(01)01228-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.04110.1016/j.msea.2008.01.041 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.crme.2005.04.00110.1016/j.crme.2005.04.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.07010.1016/j.msea.2012.09.070 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.02.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2015.02.009 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.06810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.068 ↗
24. 10.1051/mattech/201403210.1051/mattech/2014032 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.02010.1016/j.msea.2013.01.020 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60111-410.1016/S1005-0302(11)60111-4 ↗