journal article·2015-09-28

Microstructure evolution of Cu–0.2Mg alloy during continuous extrusion process

Yuan Yuan, Cheng Dai, Zhou Li, Guang Yang, Yue Liu, Zhu Xiao

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 30· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, scanning electron microscope, electron backscatter diffraction, and transmission electron microscope have been used to investigate the microstructure evolution of Cu–0.2Mg alloy during continuous extrusion in mass production. The continuous extrusion could change the size and orientation of as-cast crystallite grains of the alloy. Hardness increased gently in upsetting zone and dropped sharply in adhesion zone. Hardness reached the maximum value in right-angle bending zone; and it decreased rapidly in extending extrusion zone. Upsetting zone was mainly composed of cell blocks and microbands, and adhesion zone mainly consisted of discontinuous recrystallize grain. Shear band and subgrains were formed in right-angle bending zone due to polygonization during shear deformation. In extending extrusion zone and extrusion rod zone, recrystallize microstructures were predominant.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Yu · 2000 · 436
2. Research progress and application of contact wire for high-speed electric railway
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00100-610.1016/S1359-6454(97)00100-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-1 ↗
5. Numerical simulation analysis of microstructure evolution in the continuous extrusion for CuMg0.3 Cu-Mg alloy
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.07110.1016/j.msea.2013.09.071 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.051 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61573-210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61573-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.05410.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.054 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.00710.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.00110.1016/j.msea.2007.09.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.03810.1016/j.msea.2014.06.038 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.04110.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.041 ↗
14. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.03110.1016/j.msea.2013.06.031 ↗
16. Wang · 2009
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.028 ↗
18. Gorelik · 1981 · 122
19. Microstructure evolution of copper during continuous extrusion process
20. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.01710.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.00110.1016/j.msea.2013.07.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02110.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.021 ↗
24. Humphreys · 2004 · 261
25. 10.1016/S0965-9773(98)00113-510.1016/S0965-9773(98)00113-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.03710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.037 ↗