Al stabilized TiC twinning platelets
Source abstract
Abstract
Titanium carbide (TiC) twins are believed to be extremely unstable because of their high twin boundary energy. Here, we report that TiC twins are always presented in platelets with dimensions of 2–3 µm in length and less than 300 nm in width. In-depth microstructural characterizations by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy demonstrate that Al atoms at the twin boundary play a decisive role in stabilizing TiC twins. With different amounts of Al, perfect and defective TiC twins are formed. For perfect twins, three types of twin boundaries can be formed depending on the amount of remaining Al at the twin boundary. With inadequate Al, the TiC twins become defective with certain degrees of deviation from the perfect twin orientation. Based on a detailed analysis of the microstructure of the twin boundaries, a mechanism for the formation and stabilization of TiC twins is proposed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Age-hardening copper–titanium alloys
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.02010.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.020 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19143.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19143.x ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.17550410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.175504 ↗
5. 10.1107/S002188981204601810.1107/S0021889812046018 ↗
6. Microstructure of Ti3SiC2 prepared by the in-situ hot pressing/solid–liquid reaction process
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.03.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.03.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00151-210.1016/S1359-6454(99)00151-2 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0241010.1038/nature02410 ↗
10. 10.1039/b108685e10.1039/b108685e ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2008.012610.1557/jmr.2008.0126 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.01810.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00032-610.1016/S1359-6454(03)00032-6 ↗
14. 10.1080/0141861920824800310.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00248-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00248-3 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.122936910.1126/science.1229369 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0264429110.1007/BF02644291 ↗
18. 10.1007/PL0001087610.1007/PL00010876 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)00692-710.1016/S0925-8388(00)00692-7 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssb.1966015014110.1002/pssb.19660150141 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.12.13210.1016/j.jallcom.2012.12.132 ↗
22. 10.1361/10549710277033130710.1361/105497102770331307 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0966-9795(99)00055-210.1016/S0966-9795(99)00055-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.03310.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.033 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09875.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09875.x ↗
26. On the temperature-concentration bound of cellular decomposition in Cu–Ti system
27. 10.1126/science.111983910.1126/science.1119839 ↗
28. 10.1038/nature1059310.1038/nature10593 ↗
29. 10.1038/nature1172810.1038/nature11728 ↗
30. 10.1007/s40145-012-0034-910.1007/s40145-012-0034-9 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.118586610.1126/science.1185866 ↗
32. A study of the Ti–Fe–Al, Ti–Ni–Al, and Ti–Cu–Al systems
33. 10.1016/0956-716X(95)93205-I10.1016/0956-716X(95)93205-I ↗
34. 10.1063/1.317697910.1063/1.3176979 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.06610.1016/j.msea.2013.12.066 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.013 ↗
37. 10.1080/0141861930822120810.1080/01418619308221208 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.02810.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.028 ↗