journal article·2019-05-14Open access

An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic nanocomposites elucidated using in situ straining in a TEM

Yuchi Cui, Nan Li, Amit Misra

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 9

Abstract

Nanostructured multiphase metallic materials present extraordinary properties, such as high strength, enhanced fatigue and radiation resistance, and thermal stability, compared to conventional bulk metallic materials. Previous research studies have shown that their deformation and fracture behavior are dominated by defect interactions at internal interfaces. In situ straining, including nanoindentation, compression, and tension, in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) has emerged as a powerful tool to investigate the physics of defect–interface interactions at the nano-scale and even atomic scale. The mechanistic insights gained from these experiments coupled with dislocation theory and atomistic modeling has helped develop a fundamental understanding of the mechanical properties. In this article, through some recent investigations on observing dislocation and interface activities, crack propagation, and nanopillar compression, we present current progress in utilizing in situ TEM straining to examine interface-dominated deformation mechanisms.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.04710.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.047 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.02010.1016/j.msea.2014.12.020 ↗
3. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.17610.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.176 ↗
4. 26. Nó M. , Ibarra A. , Caillard D. , and San Juan J. : Stress-induced phase transformations studied by in-situ transmission electron microscopy. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 240, 012002 (2010).
5. 10.1080/21663831.2018.143131510.1080/21663831.2018.1431315 ↗
6. 10.1557/mrs.2014.30610.1557/mrs.2014.306 ↗
7. Experimental observations of deformation mechanisms in metallic nanolaminates
8. 10.1557/mrs.2016.6610.1557/mrs.2016.66 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.00110.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.032 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.eml.2018.10.00710.1016/j.eml.2018.10.007 ↗
12. 10.2320/matertrans1989.38.107210.2320/matertrans1989.38.1072 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.311113710.1063/1.3111137 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.05.05210.1016/j.matchar.2018.05.052 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0241105910.1007/BF02411059 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.027 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat237010.1038/nmat2370 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature0869210.1038/nature08692 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.01310.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.013 ↗
20. 10.1557/S088376940005150210.1557/S0883769400051502 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.400595310.1115/1.4005953 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat305510.1038/nmat3055 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.171619210.1063/1.1716192 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.173468910.1063/1.1734689 ↗
25. 10.1557/S088376940005151410.1557/S0883769400051514 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11837-007-0120-610.1007/s11837-007-0120-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.02510.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.025 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.05910.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.059 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.00210.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.002 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat422810.1038/nmat4228 ↗
31. On the strengthening effects of interfaces in multilayer fee metallic composites
32. 10.1080/1478643060066979010.1080/14786430600669790 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.00710.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.007 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat434010.1038/nmat4340 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11661-013-1765-010.1007/s11661-013-1765-0 ↗
36. 10.1557/JMR.2004.047410.1557/JMR.2004.0474 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0264698810.1007/BF02646988 ↗
38. 10.1557/jmr.2009.009210.1557/jmr.2009.0092 ↗
39. 10.1080/0141861900824434010.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-006-0472-210.1007/s10853-006-0472-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.04.00810.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.04.008 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.04410.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.03210.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.032 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.05110.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.051 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.12.01310.1016/j.tsf.2017.12.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90027-210.1016/0022-5096(90)90027-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10760210.1016/j.matdes.2019.107602 ↗
48. 10.1080/0141861020823962610.1080/01418610208239626 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.367544710.1063/1.3675447 ↗
50. 10.1017/S143192761200133X10.1017/S143192761200133X ↗
51. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.04710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.047 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.02710.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.027 ↗
53. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
54. 10.1126/science.116764110.1126/science.1167641 ↗
55. 10.1038/ncomms458010.1038/ncomms4580 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.00510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.005 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.008 ↗
58. 10.1002/adma.20140021710.1002/adma.201400217 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.293892110.1063/1.2938921 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.04410.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.044 ↗
61. 10.1557/jmr.2009.014710.1557/jmr.2009.0147 ↗