journal article·2017-02-14

On the determination of Young’s modulus of thin films with impulse excitation technique

M.F. Slim, A. Alhussein, A. Billard, F. Sanchette, M. François

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 32· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a critical assessment of Young’s modulus determination of coated materials using Impulse Excitation Technique (IET). In this technique, the coated substrate is excited by an impulse and the acoustic vibrations are recorded. The frequency of the first bending mode is then used in a mechanical model to obtain the Young’s modulus of the coating. The existing models are based on two different theories: the flexural rigidity of a composite beam and the Classical Laminated Beam Theory (CLBT). The aim of the present paper is to assess the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the technique. For this, different models proposed in the literature are compared with a finite element model of the specimen for various conditions. The trueness and precision of models were evaluated and the best model was identified. Then a detailed uncertainty budget is performed to identify and quantify the most influent factors on the global uncertainty.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Gere · 2003
2. 10.6028/jres.064B.02510.6028/jres.064B.025 ↗
3. Pulvérisation cathodique magnétron
4. 30. Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual (6.12).
5. Lord · 2007
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.11510.1016/j.msea.2008.09.115 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.009 ↗
8. François · 2001
9. 32. JCGM 100:2008(E): Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008).
10. 20. ASTM E1876–15: Standard test method for dynamic Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration (2015).
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.00510.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.005 ↗
12. 31. JCGM 200:2012: International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) (2012).
13. 10.1016/S0151-9107(99)80024-510.1016/S0151-9107(99)80024-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.05.01510.1016/j.vacuum.2015.05.015 ↗
15. 10.1147/rd.194.033410.1147/rd.194.0334 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.11110.1016/j.msea.2003.08.111 ↗
17. 10.6028/jres.064A.01410.6028/jres.064A.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.09110.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.091 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.06.02410.1016/j.tsf.2014.06.024 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)08998-510.1016/S0040-6090(96)08998-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.01.00510.1016/j.msea.2003.01.005 ↗
22. Equations for computing elastic constants from flexural and torsional resonant frequencies of vibration of prisms and cylinders
23. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00198-710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00198-7 ↗
24. 10.6028/jres.060.04710.6028/jres.060.047 ↗
25. 10.1002/978047011786610.1002/9780470117866 ↗
26. 10.1116/1.131273210.1116/1.1312732 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.09.00310.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.09.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.00310.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.003 ↗
29. 10.6028/jres.065A.02010.6028/jres.065A.020 ↗
30. 33. Bullough C.K. : The determination of uncertainties in Dynamic Young’s Modulus. Standards Measurment & Testing Project No. SMT4-CT97-2165 (2000).
31. 10.1533/9780857096883.1.12110.1533/9780857096883.1.121 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.18210.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.182 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.08010.1016/j.msea.2003.09.080 ↗