journal article·2020-10-14

Free boundary effects and representative volume elements in 3D printed Ti–6Al–4V gyroid structures

Anh Pham, Cambre Kelly, Ken Gall

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The adoption of selective laser melting (SLM) for fabrication of porous titanium has resulted in many new investigations into the complex design parameters associated with porous architecture of high spatial resolution. The development of meta-materials has included research into the effects of unit cell architecture (strut versus sheet), porosity, pore size, and other factors on the performance of metallic scaffolds. The current study examined the interactive effects of varying the gyroid sheet unit cell size and overall specimen size on the compressive behavior of Ti–6Al–4V ELI porous scaffolds manufactured via SLM. The increasing unit cell size relative to specimen geometry was found to decrease the compressive strength and stiffness of the overall structure and shift the material fracture mode. The understanding of the relationship between unit cell size and specimen geometry can be used to optimize mechanical properties of implants with constrained volumes and pore/wall size requirements to optimize properties of porous titanium implants for strength and osseointegration.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.02310.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.023 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.06910.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
4. Substrate curvature as a cue to guide spatiotemporal cell and tissue organization10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119739 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.02410.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.06310.1016/j.msea.2015.01.063 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.06310.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.063 ↗
8. Energy absorption characteristics of metallic triply periodic minimal surface sheet structures under compressive loading
9. 10.3390/met909100410.3390/met9091004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.03610.1016/j.joms.2011.09.036 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.00110.1016/j.msec.2015.05.001 ↗
14. 10.1089/3dp.2015.003810.1089/3dp.2015.0038 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.003 ↗
16. Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.04910.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00068-016-0738-610.1007/s00068-016-0738-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-610.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.02410.1016/j.msec.2019.01.024 ↗
23. 10.1177/107110071562089510.1177/1071100715620895 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.03310.1016/j.arth.2018.02.033 ↗
25. 10.1177/107110071877013310.1177/1071100718770133 ↗
26. Schoen · 1970
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.03410.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.034 ↗
28. 10.1093/rb/rbw01610.1093/rb/rbw016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.04610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.046 ↗
30. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan652110.1126/scitranslmed.aan6521 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10816510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108165 ↗
32. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials
33. 10.1007/BF0116582410.1007/BF01165824 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.10002410.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma712816810.3390/ma7128168 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.09410.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.06510.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.065 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.03.00810.1016/j.actbio.2007.03.008 ↗
40. Design and structure-function characterization of 3D printed synthetic porous biomaterials for tissue engineering
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.05010.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.050 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.00310.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003 ↗
43. Ashby · 2000
44. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.04810.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗