TEM study of alpha-damaged plutonium and americium dioxides
Source abstract
Abstract
Actinide-based nuclear ceramics, oxides particularly, are not only used as fuel in nuclear power reactors (uranium and plutonium) but are also used/envisaged as materials for electrical power sources in space probes (plutonium or americium). These actinides are all alpha-emitters, some having rather short half-lives. As a result of their strong alpha-activity, the actinide-based materials cumulate radiation damage and radiogenic helium. The stability of such materials needs to be assessed and understood for predicting the long-term stability of not only spent fuel in storage/disposal conditions but also of electrical power sources to be used in space probes. This paper describes the specific transmission electron microscope microstructure analyses of aged238PuO2,238Pu-doped UO2(to simulate aged spent nuclear fuel), and of241AmO2samples (candidate electrical power source) and makes the correlation of the observed defects with other properties like helium thermal desorption and lattice parameter. It is shown that these fluorite structured materials resist to high alpha-damage levels and can accommodate large quantities of helium.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00188-010.1016/S0022-3115(03)00188-0 ↗
2. X-ray absorption at the oxygen K edge in cubic f oxides examined using a full multiple-scattering approach
3. 2013
4. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.05510.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.055 ↗
5. 10.13182/NT75-A2443210.13182/NT75-A24432 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.31410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.314 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.02410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.024 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.03410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.034 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.16740610.1103/PhysRevLett.107.167406 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jssc.2013.12.01610.1016/j.jssc.2013.12.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.05010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.050 ↗
12. 10.1524/ract.2000.88.9-11.52710.1524/ract.2000.88.9-11.527 ↗
13. Bestimmung der Größe und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Röntgenstrahlen
14. 10.1557/PROC-663-39110.1557/PROC-663-391 ↗
15. Schmidt · 1994 · 920
16. 10.1016/0022-3115(81)90528-610.1016/0022-3115(81)90528-6 ↗
17. Wiss · 2013 · 153
18. Baker · 2014
19. 10.1080/0033757830822471510.1080/00337578308224715 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.06110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.061 ↗
21. 10.1557/PROC-824-CC9.810.1557/PROC-824-CC9.8 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-1902(68)80072-710.1016/0022-1902(68)80072-7 ↗
23. Ziegler · 1985
24. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.15410.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.154 ↗
25. Mors
26. 10.1080/00223131.2014.88958310.1080/00223131.2014.889583 ↗
27. Feiveson · 2011
28. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00351-X10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00351-X ↗
30. 10.1126/science.346.6216.144210.1126/science.346.6216.1442 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.00710.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.007 ↗
32. 10.1021/ic500681k10.1021/ic500681k ↗
33. 10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00039-210.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00039-2 ↗
34. 10.1016/0020-1650(77)80091-310.1016/0020-1650(77)80091-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/0020-1650(77)80116-510.1016/0020-1650(77)80116-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00171-610.1016/S0925-8388(98)00171-6 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11837-012-0483-110.1007/s11837-012-0483-1 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.009 ↗
39. Casalta · 1995 · 1667
40. 10.1080/0033757840821579810.1080/00337578408215798 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.06610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.066 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.00610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.006 ↗