journal article·2009-03

Influence of the indenter tip geometry and environment on the indentation modulus of enamel

G.M. Guidoni, L.H. He, T. Schöberl, I. Jäger, G. Dehm, M.V. Swain

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 24· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of the investigation was to study the influence of indenter tip geometry on the conventionally obtained indentation modulus of enamel by nanoindentation. Indentation tests on bovine enamel using three different diamond pyramidal indenters with half face angles 65.27°, 45°, and 35.26° were conducted to evaluate the indentation modulus using the Oliver–Pharr method [W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr,J. Mater. Res.7,1564 (1992)]. In addition, three different dehydration conditions were studied: wet under Hank's balanced salt solution, laboratory dried, and vacuum dehydrated. For the Berkovich indenter (65.27°) and 45° pyramidal indenters, there was only a small difference between indentation modulus values, whereas for the cube-corner indenter (35.26°) a ratio of 2.4 between laboratory dry and wet samples was found. A detailed evaluation, including indentation creep and recovery as well as pileup, resulted in a reduction of this latter ratio to 1.7. This still large difference was rationalized on the basis of the different deformation mechanisms generated by indenters of different face angles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.192041010.1063/1.1920410 ↗
2. 10.1557/jmr.2006.025710.1557/jmr.2006.0257 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0111359510.1007/BF01113595 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-310.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.245064910.1063/1.2450649 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478643060059975710.1080/14786430600599757 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.045 ↗
9. Currey · 2002 · 43610.1515/9781400849505 ↗
10. 10. Guidoni G. : Nano-scale mechanical and tribological properties of mineralized tissues. Ph.D. Thesis, Montan University Leoben, Leoben, Austria, 2008.
11. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.24910.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.249 ↗
12. 10.1098/rspa.1964.011410.1098/rspa.1964.0114 ↗
13. 10.1098/rspa.1969.012610.1098/rspa.1969.0126 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.2003.019410.1557/JMR.2003.0194 ↗
15. 10.1098/rspa.1947.000910.1098/rspa.1947.0009 ↗
16. Vincent · 1990 · 244
17. 10.1063/1.224543910.1063/1.2245439 ↗
18. 10.4012/dmj.20.22710.4012/dmj.20.227 ↗
19. 10.1557/jmr.2006.023710.1557/jmr.2006.0237 ↗
20. 10.1023/A:100890110970510.1023/A:1008901109705 ↗
21. 10.1177/0022034501080001050110.1177/00220345010800010501 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00039-810.1016/S0021-9290(02)00039-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.05910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.059 ↗
24. 10.1177/0022034598077003060110.1177/00220345980770030601 ↗
25. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
26. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-9 ↗
27. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.16510.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.165 ↗
28. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
29. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
30. 23. Poolthong S. : Determination of the mechanical properties of enamel, dentine, and cementum by an ultra micro-indentation system. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 1998.
31. Ntim · 2006 · 0898
32. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.03.00510.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.03.005 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00006-710.1016/S0003-9969(02)00006-7 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-310.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
35. 10.1557/JMR.1995.010110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗