Measuring critical stress for shear failure of interfacial regions in coating/interlayer/substrate systems through a micro-pillar testing protocol
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical integrity of the interfacial region between ceramic coatings and substrates is critical to high performance coated mechanical components and manufacturing tools. Mechanical failure of the coating/substrate interfacial region often leads to catastrophic failure of the coated system as a whole. Despite extensive research over the past two decades, quantitative assessment of the mechanical response of coating/substrate interfacial regions remains a challenge. The lack of reliable protocols for measuring the mechanical response of coating/substrate interfacial regions quantitatively hampers the understanding of key factors controlling the mechanical integrity of coating/substrate interfaces. In this paper, we describe a new micro-pillar testing protocol for quantitative measurement of critical stresses for inducing shear failure of interfacial regions in ceramic-coating/metal-adhesion-layer/substrate systems. We observe significant differences in the critical stress for shear failure of interfacial regions in CrN/Cu/Si, CrN/Cr/Si, and CrN/Ti/Si systems. The present testing protocol has general applicability to a wide range of coating/interlayer/substrate systems.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rsta.2010.019410.1098/rsta.2010.0194 ↗
2. Holmberg · 1994
3. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90120-X10.1016/0001-6160(89)90120-X ↗
4. 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00342-910.1016/S0040-6090(99)00342-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00108-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00108-7 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1997.026010.1557/JMR.1997.0260 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.eml.2014.12.00110.1016/j.eml.2014.12.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01290-710.1016/S0257-8972(01)01290-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00457-010.1016/S0257-8972(99)00457-0 ↗
10. 10.1098/rspa.1996.012410.1098/rspa.1996.0124 ↗
11. Brown · 1995 · 1 · 1510.1515/9783112318966-003 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.166193510.1063/1.1661935 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/0257-8972(96)80011-910.1016/0257-8972(96)80011-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.01410.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.00110.1016/j.msea.2011.07.001 ↗
17. 10.1557/mrc.2016.2010.1557/mrc.2016.20 ↗
18. Thickness dependence of flow stress of Cu thin films in confined shear plastic flow10.1557/mrc.2014.26 ↗
19. 10.1557/mrc.2014.310.1557/mrc.2014.3 ↗
20. Bull · 2001 · 2 · 107
21. Kattamis · 1995 · 1 · 14310.1515/9783112318966-011 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00445-610.1016/S0257-8972(03)00445-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00467-510.1016/S0257-8972(03)00467-5 ↗
24. 10.1557/jmr.2007.014010.1557/jmr.2007.0140 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-006-0171-z10.1007/s10853-006-0171-z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.07510.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.075 ↗
27. Cullity · 2001