journal article·2011-10-28

Deformation and fracture of single-crystal silicon theta-like specimens

Michael S. Gaither, Frank W. DelRio, Richard S. Gates, Robert F. Cook

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 26· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Single-crystal silicon test specimens, fabricated by lithography and deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), were used to measure microscale deformation and fracture properties. The mechanical properties of two specimen geometries, both in the form of a Greek letter Θ (theta), were measured using an instrumented indentation system. The DRIE process generated two different surface structures leading to two strength distributions that were specimen geometry independent: One distribution, centered about 2.1 GPa, was controlled by 35 nm surface roughness of scallops; the second distribution, centered about 1.4 GPa, was controlled by larger, 150 nm, pitting defects. Finite element analyses (FEA) converted measured loads into strengths; tensile elastic measurements validated the FEA. Fractographic observations verified failure locations. The theta specimen and testing protocols are shown to be extremely effective at testing statistically relevant (hundreds) numbers of samples to establish processing-structure-property relationships at ultrasmall scales and for determining design parameters for components of microelectromechanical systems.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.1995.010110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.172329210.1063/1.1723292 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-0248(87)90207-710.1016/0022-0248(87)90207-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00294-310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00294-3 ↗
6. 10.1109/5.24895810.1109/5.248958 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10853-006-6567-y10.1007/s10853-006-6567-y ↗
8. 10.1007/s00339-005-3204-610.1007/s00339-005-3204-6 ↗
9. Evaluation of damage on silicon wafers using the angle lapping method and a biaxial fracture strength test
10. 10.1088/0960-1317/19/8/08200110.1088/0960-1317/19/8/082001 ↗
11. Quinn · 2005 · 117
12. Ashby · 1999
13. 10.1134/S002016851013001710.1134/S0020168510130017 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10321.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10321.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.00610.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.006 ↗
16. Quinn · 2007
17. Davidge · 1979
18. 10.1016/0001-6160(57)90164-510.1016/0001-6160(57)90164-5 ↗
19. 10.1109/JMEMS.2007.89279410.1109/JMEMS.2007.892794 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.171321410.1063/1.1713214 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.36110210.1063/1.361102 ↗
22. Mechanical deformation in silicon by micro-indentation
23. 10.1557/JMR.1991.124810.1557/JMR.1991.1248 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.02.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.02.001 ↗
25. 10.1109/JMEMS.2011.215909710.1109/JMEMS.2011.2159097 ↗
26. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.18410.1038/nphoton.2009.184 ↗
27. Durelli · 1967 · 173
28. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00692.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00692.x ↗
29. 10.1557/JMR.1997.032710.1557/JMR.1997.0327 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.36971110.1063/1.369711 ↗
31. 10.1109/JMEMS.2005.85182010.1109/JMEMS.2005.851820 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0304-3991(02)00089-X10.1016/S0304-3991(02)00089-X ↗
33. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
34. 10.1116/1.162267610.1116/1.1622676 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.33113710.1063/1.331137 ↗
36. 10.1016/0921-5107(95)01258-310.1016/0921-5107(95)01258-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00348-310.1016/S0924-4247(98)00348-3 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.04410.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
39. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-14535510.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145355 ↗
40. 10.1109/JMEMS.2002.100740510.1109/JMEMS.2002.1007405 ↗
41. Durelli · 1962 · 931
42. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
43. 10.1109/84.89676510.1109/84.896765 ↗
44. 10.1007/s11340-009-9286-x10.1007/s11340-009-9286-x ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1277710.1103/PhysRevB.59.12777 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.04710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.047 ↗
47. 10.1021/nl052223z10.1021/nl052223z ↗
48. 10.3139/146.10152710.3139/146.101527 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0924-4247(00)00350-210.1016/S0924-4247(00)00350-2 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.166193510.1063/1.1661935 ↗
51. 10.1088/0960-1317/16/4/00710.1088/0960-1317/16/4/007 ↗
52. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01413.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01413.x ↗
53. 10.1016/S0254-0584(98)80014-X10.1016/S0254-0584(98)80014-X ↗
54. 10.1021/nl902132w10.1021/nl902132w ↗
55. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
56. The theta specimen for determining tensile strength of brittle materials
57. 10.1016/0001-6160(55)90051-110.1016/0001-6160(55)90051-1 ↗
58. 10.1080/1478643620821384910.1080/14786436208213849 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.04.02310.1016/j.sna.2007.04.023 ↗
60. 10.1017/CBO978051162312710.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
61. 10.1179/026708309X1258456405201210.1179/026708309X12584564052012 ↗
62. 10.1109/JMEMS.2005.85919610.1109/JMEMS.2005.859196 ↗
63. 10.1109/JPROC.2003.81180710.1109/JPROC.2003.811807 ↗
64. 10.1109/JMEMS.2003.81413010.1109/JMEMS.2003.814130 ↗
65. Senturia · 200110.1007/b117574 ↗
66. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05119.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05119.x ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.002 ↗
68. 10.1063/1.34695710.1063/1.346957 ↗
69. 10.1080/1478643660821196810.1080/14786436608211968 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.34047110.1063/1.340471 ↗
71. 10.1080/71403770810.1080/714037708 ↗
72. Madou · 200210.1201/9781482274004 ↗
73. 10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00119-710.1016/S0026-2714(03)00119-7 ↗
74. Quinn · 2009 · 201
75. 10.1007/BF0015526310.1007/BF00155263 ↗
76. 10.1109/84.53662010.1109/84.536620 ↗