journal article·2012-06-28

Indentation size effect in FCC metals: An examination of experimental techniques and the bilinear behavior

David E. Stegall, Md. Abdullah Mamun, Bryan Crawford, Abdelmageed Elmustafa

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The indentation size effect (ISE) and the bilinear behavior for pure face centered cubic (FCC) metals including aluminum, nickel, silver, and 70/30 copper–zinc (α-brass) alloy using a single Berkovich indenter tip in a single test machine were investigated. The results confirmed that this behavior is mechanistic in nature and were consistent with those reported by A.A. Elmustafa and D.S. Stone [J. Mech. Phys. Solids51, 357–381 (2003)] of the ISE and the bilinear behavior using two separate indenter tips (Berkovich and Vickers) from two separate machines. Therefore, the bilinear behavior is present regardless of tip geometry or machine used. We also investigated the cause for a deviation in the continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) data from discrete data points obtained using the load control protocol at shallow depth. We conducted experiments near grain boundaries to determine if the CSM deviation at shallow depths were caused by a hardening effect due to dislocation interaction with the interface.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Copper Interconnects and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Variable (intrinsic) material length scale for face-centred cubic metals using nano-indentation
2. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
3. 10.1002/1521-4079(200111)36:11<1253::AID-CRAT1253>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1521-4079(200111)36:11<1253::AID-CRAT1253>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
4. 10.1557/JMR.2004.031610.1557/JMR.2004.0316 ↗
5. 10.1016/0036-9748(89)90534-610.1016/0036-9748(89)90534-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.07.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2011.07.002 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2009.008810.1557/jmr.2009.0088 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00136-110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00136-1 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00707-009-0151-x10.1007/s00707-009-0151-x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.009 ↗
11. 10.1080/0141861860824284910.1080/01418618608242849 ↗
12. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.18910.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.189 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.00210.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.04010.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.040 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.00110.1016/j.msea.2006.04.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00284-110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00284-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.00410.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.004 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.178996210.1115/1.1789962 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1995.085310.1557/JMR.1995.0853 ↗
20. 10.1080/1478643060057791010.1080/14786430600577910 ↗
21. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-910.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
22. 10.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-210.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11012-006-9018-610.1007/s11012-006-9018-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.04910.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.049 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00033-910.1016/S0022-5096(02)00033-9 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11340-008-9202-910.1007/s11340-008-9202-9 ↗
27. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10445610.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
28. Size effects and length scales in nanoindentation for body-centred cubic materials with application to iron
29. 10.1007/s00707-009-0222-z10.1007/s00707-009-0222-z ↗
30. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00022-810.1016/S0022-5096(99)00022-8 ↗
31. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
32. 10.1557/jmr.2009.009610.1557/jmr.2009.0096 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00103-310.1016/S0022-5096(98)00103-3 ↗
34. 31. Pathak S. , Michler J. , Wasmer K. , and Kalidindi S.R. : Studying grain boundary regions in polycrystalline materials using spherical nano-indentation and orientation imaging microscopy. J. Mater. Sci. 47(2), 815-823 1–9 (2012).10.1007/s10853-011-5859-z ↗