journal article·2012-01-28

Comparison of mechanical behaviors of enamel rod and interrod regions in enamel

Siang Fung Ang, Mahnaz Saadatmand, Michael V. Swain, Arndt Klocke, Gerold A. Schneider

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Interrod regions exist between the enamel rods and are known to have different crystallite orientations and a higher organic content compared to the enamel rods (the intrarod regions). This study aims to characterize the mechanical properties of both regions especially the time-dependent properties by using spherical indentation. Despite the very small amount of proteins, the interrod region shows statistically significantly higher inelastic energy dissipation than the intrarod region with increased deformation times. The total displacement under constant load (creep), viscosity, and stress relaxation behavior of both regions are also reported. Similar to the observation of previous studies, the elastic modulus and hardness in the intrarod region are significantly higher than in the interrod region.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Engineering Technology and Methodologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.282798710.1063/1.2827987 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.020 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.08.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.08.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00039-810.1016/S0021-9290(02)00039-8 ↗
5. The theory of viscoelasticity in biomaterials
6. 10.1039/tf970660008010.1039/tf9706600080 ↗
7. Nanoindentation creep behavior of human enamel
8. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00316-710.1016/S0022-3093(01)00316-7 ↗
9. 10.1080/1478643060074066610.1080/14786430600740666 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.364402010.1115/1.3644020 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.3105110.1002/jbm.a.31051 ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.09.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.09.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.05910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.059 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00089-310.1016/S0003-9969(00)00089-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-5320(65)90001-810.1016/S0022-5320(65)90001-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.017 ↗
19. Nanci · 2003
20. 10.1557/JMR.2003.002010.1557/JMR.2003.0020 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11043-009-9098-510.1007/s11043-009-9098-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-5320(78)90053-910.1016/S0022-5320(78)90053-9 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.2005.025910.1557/JMR.2005.0259 ↗
24. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:4<133::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:4<133::AID-EVAN4>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
25. 10.1002/cphc.20080057210.1002/cphc.200800572 ↗
26. Hertz · 1896
27. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.10.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.045 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.027 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.05010.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.050 ↗
31. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
32. Healy · 1995 · 25
33. 10.1016/S0022-5320(68)90045-210.1016/S0022-5320(68)90045-2 ↗
34. Gray · 1995 · 1710