journal article·2012-01-14

Experimental determination of the effective indenter shape and ε-factor for nanoindentation by continuously measuring the unloading stiffness

Benoit Merle, Verena Maier, Mathias Göken, Karsten Durst

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The Oliver and Pharr method for evaluating nanoindentation load–displacement data is based on the measurement of the contact stiffness, which is usually determined at the very beginning of the unloading sequence, or, using dynamic nanoindentation, continuously during the whole loading segment. A new experimental method has been developed to continuously monitor the contact stiffness throughout the unloading sequence. It provides supplementary information about the shape and area of the residual impression, as well as a direct measurement of the shape of the effective indenter previously introduced by Pharr and Bolshakov. The new method was applied to indentations on fused silica, sapphire, nanocrystalline nickel, and ultrafine-grained aluminum. Lastly, the new procedure was adapted to directly measure the epsilon factor used in the Oliver and Pharr method. A value of 0.76 was found from indentation into fused silica, in close agreement with literature values.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Bolshakov · 1995 · 356 · 675
2. 10.1557/JMR.2007.038110.1557/JMR.2007.0381 ↗
3. 10.1080/14786435.2010.48825310.1080/14786435.2010.488253 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.03610.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.036 ↗
5. 10.1080/1478643060073546810.1080/14786430600735468 ↗
6. 10.1557/jmr.2009.009610.1557/jmr.2009.0096 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x ↗
8. 10.1557/JMR.2005.014110.1557/JMR.2005.0141 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.25310.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.253 ↗
10. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2011.15610.1557/jmr.2011.156 ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1992.061310.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
15. 10.1080/0950083001000845710.1080/09500830010008457 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.2000.017110.1557/JMR.2000.0171 ↗
17. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.1997.032410.1557/JMR.1997.0324 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
20. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/21/21540710.1088/0022-3727/41/21/215407 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.04.00410.1016/j.electacta.2003.04.004 ↗
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.3110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.31 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20100027010.1002/adem.201000270 ↗
24. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20030658210.1002/adem.200306582 ↗
26. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/19/02310.1088/0022-3727/37/19/023 ↗