journal article·2008-04

Effect of precipitate volume fraction on fracture toughness of extruded Mg–Zn alloys

Hidetoshi Somekawa, Yoshiaki Osawa, Alok Singh, Toshiji Mukai

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 23· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Four kinds of extruded Mg–X at.% Zn binary alloys (X = 1.9, 2.4, 3.0, and 3.4) were used to examine the effect of precipitate volume fraction on fracture toughness. All the alloys had fine grain sizes of 1–3 μm and fine sphere-shaped precipitates of 50–60 nm. The volume fraction of precipitates increased with additional zinc content. The results of mechanical property tests showed that the extruded Mg–2.4 at.% Zn alloy exhibited the best balance of strength and fracture toughness. One of the reasons was the different volume fraction of precipitates at the grain boundaries, which was the source of void formation. According to the fracture surface observations and ductile fracture model analysis, the volume fraction of precipitates of 2%–4% was shown to be enough to improve the fracture toughness for the fine-grained magnesium alloys; i.e., higher contents of zinc atoms were not needed to enhance the mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2320/matertrans.44.77510.2320/matertrans.44.775 ↗
2. 10.1557/jmr.2007.011210.1557/jmr.2007.0112 ↗
3. 10.2320/jinstmet1952.52.1_2610.2320/jinstmet1952.52.1_26 ↗
4. 10.2320/matertrans.44.98610.2320/matertrans.44.986 ↗
5. 10.1557/jmr.2007.033410.1557/jmr.2007.0334 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1350-6307(03)00059-110.1016/S1350-6307(03)00059-1 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0264335010.1007/BF02643350 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.013 ↗
10. 10.1080/0950083060062726510.1080/09500830600627265 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661-998-0249-010.1007/s11661-998-0249-0 ↗
12. Massalski · 1990 · 2571
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.02410.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.029 ↗
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.15510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.155 ↗
16. 10.2320/matertrans1960.4.110.2320/matertrans1960.4.1 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-3 ↗
18. 10.2320/matertrans.44.44510.2320/matertrans.44.445 ↗
19. 10.2320/matertrans.MRA200635510.2320/matertrans.MRA2006355 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
21. 10.2320/matertrans.47.99510.2320/matertrans.47.995 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.02110.1016/j.msea.2007.01.021 ↗
23. 1993 · 645–705
24. 2001
25. 2001
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.048 ↗
27. Electron microfractography.
28. 10.1016/0001-6160(65)90039-810.1016/0001-6160(65)90039-8 ↗
29. 10.1557/JMR.2005.018010.1557/JMR.2005.0180 ↗
30. Morozumi · 1990 · 940
31. DeHoff · 1968
32. Transmission quantitative metallography.
33. Unstable crack propagation in metals: Cleavage and fast fracture, in
34. Fracture analysis.
35. 1999 · 258–273
36. 10.1007/BF0281605010.1007/BF02816050 ↗
37. 10.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
38. 10.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-810.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-8 ↗
39. 10.1016/0036-9748(84)90489-710.1016/0036-9748(84)90489-7 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0267228510.1007/BF02672285 ↗
41. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90205-U10.1016/0010-4361(91)90205-U ↗
42. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.00110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.001 ↗
43. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90148-710.1016/0001-6160(83)90148-7 ↗
44. 10.2464/jilm.31.72010.2464/jilm.31.720 ↗