journal article·2007-05

Reliability analysis of Au–Sn flip-chip solder bump fabricated by co-electroplating

Jeong-Won Yoon, Hyun-Suk Chun, Seung-Boo Jung

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 22· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we fabricated eutectic Au–Sn (Au–20 wt% Sn) flip-chip solder bumps from a single electroplating bath. After reflowing, the average diameter of the solder bump was approximately 80 μm. The (Ni,Au)3Sn2phase was initially formed when the liquid Au–Sn solder reacted with the Ni UBM (under bump metallization). After aging at 150 °C, the (Ni,Au)3Sn2intermetallic compound (IMC), which formed at the interface during reflow, was fully transformed into the (Au,Ni)Sn IMC due to the restricted supply of Ni atoms from the UBM to the interface. On the other hand, after aging at 250 °C for 1000 h, two IMC layers, (Au,Ni)Sn and (Ni,Au)3Sn2, were formed at the interface. The lower (Ni,Au)3Sn2phase was formed when the (Au,Ni)Sn phase reacted with the Ni UBM. The interfacial (Au,Ni)Sn IMC grew with the preferential consumption of the available δ-phase in the solder matrix. Eventually, the ζ-phase covered most of the interfacial layer. In the bump shear tests, the Au–Sn/Ni joint aged at 150 °C fractured through the bulk of the solder, confirming the mechanical reliability of the interface. In contrast, the Au–Sn/Ni joint aged at 250 °C fractured along the interface, thereby demonstrating brittle failure, possibly a result of the brittle IMC layer at the interface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2320/matertrans.46.240010.2320/matertrans.46.2400 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11664-000-0170-910.1007/s11664-000-0170-9 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11664-005-0231-110.1007/s11664-005-0231-1 ↗
4. 10.1557/jmr.2006.019810.1557/jmr.2006.0198 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.2005.026910.1557/JMR.2005.0269 ↗
6. 10.1016/0254-0584(93)90076-X10.1016/0254-0584(93)90076-X ↗
7. 10.1063/1.35227910.1063/1.352279 ↗
8. Anhöck · 1998 · 156
9. 10.1007/s00542010010310.1007/s005420100103 ↗
10. 10.1109/TADVP.2006.87541410.1109/TADVP.2006.875414 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11664-001-0157-110.1007/s11664-001-0157-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00060-010.1016/S0921-5107(02)00060-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00515-810.1016/S0921-5107(00)00515-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.08410.1016/j.msea.2005.09.084 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.2003.035910.1557/JMR.2003.0359 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.03.04410.1016/j.matlet.2004.03.044 ↗
17. 4 Pittroff W. , Barnikow J. , Klein A. , Kurpas P. , Merkel U. , Vogel K. , Würfl J. , and Kuhmann J. : Flip chip mounting of laser diodes with Au/Sn solder bumps: Bumping, self-alignment and laser behavior. IEEE 1997 Electronic Components and Technology Conference (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1997), p. 1235.10.1109/ECTC.1997.606333 ↗
18. 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90533-U10.1016/0040-6090(93)90533-U ↗
19. 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.06.00610.1016/j.microrel.2005.06.006 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11664-001-0133-910.1007/s11664-001-0133-9 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11664-006-0185-y10.1007/s11664-006-0185-y ↗
22. Yoon