Structural Behavior of Low-Carbon and Functionally Graded Concrete One-Way Slab Strips
Source abstract
Abstract
The American Concrete Institute (ACI) is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, certification programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 224, 2007, “Causes, Evaluation, and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures (ACI 224.1R-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 22 pp.
2. ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.
3. ASTM A370-16, 2016, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 51 pp.
4. Barrias, A.; Casas, J.; and Villalba, S., 2018, “Embedded Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors in Reinforced Concrete Structures—A Case Study,” Sensors (Basel), V. 18, No. 4, pp. 980-1001. doi: 10.3390/s1804098010.3390/s18040980 ↗
5. Bentz, E. C., 2000, “Sectional Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Members,” PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
6. Bentz, E. C., 2019, “Empirical Modeling of Cracking in Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May, pp. 233-242. doi: 10.14359/5171447610.14359/51714476 ↗
7. Brault, A., and Hoult, N., 2019a, “Distributed Reinforcement Strains: Measurement and Application,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 4, July, pp. 115-127. doi: 10.14359/5171448310.14359/51714483 ↗
8. Brault, A., and Hoult, N., 2019b, “Monitoring Reinforced Concrete Serviceability Performance Using Fiber-Optic Sensors,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 1, Jan., pp. 57-70. doi: 10.14359/5171087010.14359/51710870 ↗
9. CSA A23. 1-19, 2019, “Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.
10. CSA A23.3-19, 2019, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.
11. Davis, M. B.; Hoult, N. A.; Bajaj, S.; and Bentz, E. C., 2017, “Distributed Sensing for Shrinkage and Tension Stiffening Measurement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 3, May-June, pp. 753-764. doi: 10.14359/5168946310.14359/51689463 ↗
12. Fayyad, T. M., and Lees, J. M., 2014, “Application of Digital Image Correlation to Reinforced Concrete Fracture,” Procedia Materials Science, V. 3, pp. 1585-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.25610.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.256 ↗
13. Gilbert, R. I., 2011, “The Serviceability Limit States in Reinforced Concrete Design,” Procedia Engineering, V. 14, pp. 385-395. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.04810.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.048 ↗
14. Gurutzeaga, M.; Oller, E.; Ribas, C.; Cladera, A.; and Marí, A., 2015, “Influence of the Longitudinal Reinforcement on the Shear Strength of One-Way Concrete Slabs,” Materials and Structures, V. 48, No. 8, pp. 2597-2612. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0340-510.1617/s11527-014-0340-5 ↗
15. Herrmann, M., and Sobek, W., 2017, “Functionally Graded Concrete: Numerical Design Methods and Experimental Tests of Mass-Optimized Structural Components,” Structural Concrete, V. 18, No. 1, pp. 54-66. doi: 10.1002/suco.20160001110.1002/suco.201600011 ↗
16. Hoult, N. A.; Dutton, M.; Hoag, A.; and Take, W. A., 2016, “Measuring Crack Movement in Reinforced Concrete Using Digital Image Correlation: Overview and Application to Shear Slip Measurements,” Proceedings of the IEEE, V. 104, No. 8, pp. 1561-1574. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2016.253515710.1109/JPROC.2016.2535157 ↗
17. IPCC, 2022, “Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 3056.10.1017/9781009325844 ↗
18. Juenger, M. C.; Snellings, R.; and Bernal, S. A., 2019, “Supplementary Cementitious Materials: New Sources, Characterization, and Performance Insights,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 122, pp. 257-273. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008 ↗
19. Kurad, R.; Silvestre, J. D.; de Brito, J.; and Ahmed, H., 2017, “Effect of Incorporation of High Volume of Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Fly Ash on the Strength and Global Warming Potential of Concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 166, pp. 485-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.23610.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.236 ↗
20. Lehne, J. and Preston, F., 2018, “Making Concrete Change: Innovation in Low-Carbon Cement and Concrete,” Chatham House Report.
21. Li, Q., and Xu, S., 2009, “Experimental Investigation and Analysis on Flexural Performance of Functionally Graded Composite Beam Crack-Controlled by Ultrahigh Toughness Cementitious Composites,” Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, V. 52, No. 6, pp. 1648-1664. doi: 10.1007/s11431-009-0161-x10.1007/s11431-009-0161-x ↗
22. Luna Technologies, 2023, “Luna OdiSI 6000 Data Sheet,” Blacksburg, VA.
23. Maier, M., and Lees, J., 2022, “Interlayer Fracture Behaviour of Functionally Layered Concrete,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, V. 271, p. 108672. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10867210.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108672 ↗
24. Mak, M. W. T., and Lees, J. M., 2023, “Carbon Reduction and Strength Enhancement in Functionally Graded Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 277, p. 115358 doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11535810.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115358 ↗
25. Maruyama, I., and Lura, P., 2019, “Properties of Early-Age Concrete Relevant to Cracking in Massive Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 123, p. 105770. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.015 ↗
26. Poldon, J. J.; Hoult, N. A.; and Bentz, E. C., 2019, “Distributed Sensing in Large Reinforced Concrete Shear Test,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 5, Sept., pp. 235-245. doi: 10.14359/5171676510.14359/51716765 ↗
27. Poldon, J. J.; Hoult, N. A.; and Bentz, E. C., 2021, “Understanding Reinforcement Behavior Using Distributed Measurements of Shear Tests,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 3, May, pp. 255-266.10.14359/51730537 ↗
28. Regier, R., and Hoult, N. A., 2015, “Concrete Deterioration Detection Using Distributed Sensors,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Structures and Buildings, V. 168, No. 2, pp. 118-126. doi: 10.1680/stbu.13.0007010.1680/stbu.13.00070 ↗
29. Torelli, G.; Fernández, M. G.; and Lees, J. M., 2020, “Functionally Graded Concrete: Design Objectives, Production Techniques and Analysis Methods for Layered and Continuously Graded Elements,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 242, p. 118040. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11804010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118040 ↗
30. Torelli, G., and Lees, J. M., 2020, “Interface Bond Strength of Lightweight Low-Cement Functionally Layered Concrete Elements,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 249, p. 118614. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11861410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118614 ↗
31. Yager, J.; Hoult, N. A.; and Bentz, E., 2021, “Evaluating the Behaviour of Functionally Graded Reinforced Concrete without Transverse Reinforcement Using Distributed Sensing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 295, p. 123612. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12361210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123612 ↗
32. Yager, J.; Hoult, N. A.; Bentz, E. C.; and Woods, J., 2022, “Shear-Critical Deep Beams with Embedded Functionally Graded Concrete Struts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 119, No. 6, Nov., pp. 245-257.10.14359/51734805 ↗
33. Yang, Y. S.; Huang, C. W.; and Wu, C. L., 2012, “A Simple Image‐Based Strain Measurement Method for Measuring the Strain Fields in an RC‐Wall Experiment,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 41, No. 1, pp. 1-17. doi: 10.1002/eqe.111110.1002/eqe.1111 ↗