journal article·2012-05-14Open access

Residual stress in electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel-tungsten coatings

Tiffany D. Ziebell, Christopher A. Schuh

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 9

Abstract

Characterizing the residual stress of thick nanocrystalline electrodeposits poses several unique challenges due to their fine grain structure, thickness distribution, and matte surface. We use a three-dimensional profilometry-based approach that addresses each of these complicating factors and enables quantitative analysis of residual stress with reasonable accuracy. The specific emphasis of this work is on thick (10–100 μm), nanocrystalline Ni-W electrodeposits of the finest grain sizes (4–63 nm), in which residual stresses arise during the deposition process as well as during postdeposition annealing. The present measurements offer quantitative insight into the mechanisms of stress development and evolution in these alloys, suggesting that the grain boundary structure is out of equilibrium (unrelaxed) and contains the excess free volume that controls the resulting residual stress levels in these films. There are apparently two factors contributing to this stress: the percentage of excess free volume contained in the grain boundaries, which is affected by the processing conditions, and the total volume fraction of grain boundaries, which is controlled by the grain size.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.208634310.1149/1.2086343 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.206909810.1149/1.2069098 ↗
3. 10.1016/0040-6090(79)90272-410.1016/0040-6090(79)90272-4 ↗
4. Geometric considerations for diffusion in polycrystalline solids
5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.05710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.057 ↗
6. 10.1016/0040-6090(82)90447-310.1016/0040-6090(82)90447-3 ↗
7. 41. Rupert T.J. : Nanocrystalline alloys: Enhanced strengthening mechanisms and mechanically driven structural evolution Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2011.
8. 10.1109/T-ED.1987.2298110.1109/T-ED.1987.22981 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
10. 10.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J10.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J ↗
11. Lide · 2011
12. 10.1063/1.333198610.1063/1.3331986 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.33332610.1063/1.333326 ↗
14. Preferred orientation in wrought and annealed materials10.1179/095066065790138348 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.34924710.1063/1.349247 ↗
16. 10.1016/0257-8972(86)90116-710.1016/0257-8972(86)90116-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.01110.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.011 ↗
18. Nanocrystalline Ni-W alloy coating for engineering applications
19. 10.1016/0040-6090(72)90396-310.1016/0040-6090(72)90396-3 ↗
20. 10.1557/JMR.2007.040310.1557/JMR.2007.0403 ↗
21. 10.1016/0040-6090(76)90453-310.1016/0040-6090(76)90453-3 ↗
22. 10.1143/JJAP.6.4210.1143/JJAP.6.42 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11661-003-0246-210.1007/s11661-003-0246-2 ↗
24. 43. Ziebell T.D. : Residual stress in nanocrystalline nickel-tungsten electrodeposits. M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2011.
25. 10.1063/1.300065510.1063/1.3000655 ↗
26. 10.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-710.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
27. The origins of stress in electrodeposits
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.09411210.1103/PhysRevB.79.094112 ↗
29. Peroulis · 173
30. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00489-310.1016/S0040-6090(02)00489-3 ↗
32. 10.1179/imr.1995.40.2.4110.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41 ↗
33. Freund · 2003
34. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90303-310.1016/0001-6160(88)90303-3 ↗
35. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
36. Dini · 1993
37. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9570-610.1007/978-1-4613-9570-6 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.208626610.1149/1.2086266 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.35639010.1063/1.356390 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.32508410.1063/1.325084 ↗
41. 10.1116/1.131667410.1116/1.1316674 ↗
42. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
43. Simmons · 1971
44. 10.1016/0040-6090(84)90490-510.1016/0040-6090(84)90490-5 ↗
45. 10.1116/1.131570210.1116/1.1315702 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0022-0728(69)80326-810.1016/S0022-0728(69)80326-8 ↗
47. Davis · 1978 · 190
48. 10.1023/A:101849740136510.1023/A:1018497401365 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.12372210.1063/1.123722 ↗
50. 10.1149/1.241144110.1149/1.2411441 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.07.001 ↗
52. 10.1016/0040-6090(78)90140-210.1016/0040-6090(78)90140-2 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.032 ↗
54. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
55. Cullity · 1959 · 262
56. 10.1023/A:101869300500210.1023/A:1018693005002 ↗
57. 10.1080/1040843880824373410.1080/10408438808243734 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.00110.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.001 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.00510.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.005 ↗
60. 10.1002/adem.20031008110.1002/adem.200310081 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.181997210.1063/1.1819972 ↗
62. 10.1179/03063457579044516110.1179/030634575790445161 ↗
63. 10.1557/JMR.1999.046810.1557/JMR.1999.0468 ↗