journal article·2005-10

Vickers hardness and compressive properties of bulk metallic glasses and nanostructure-dendrite composites

X.F. Pan, H. Zhang, Z.F. Zhang, M. Stoica, G. He, J. Eckert

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 20· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The compressive properties and the Vickers hardness of Cu-, Fe-, Mg-, and Zr-based monolithic bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) as well as Ti-based nanostructure-dendrite composites were investigated and compared. The monolithic BMGs exhibit nearly the same yield strength σ y and fracture strength σf but poor plasticity. The Vickers hardness HV of the monolithic BMGs follows the empirical relationship HV/3 ≈σy ≈σf. The Ti-based composites yield at a relatively low stress level (less than 850 MPa) but fail at a very high fracture stress (∼ 2 GPa) and exhibit a large strain hardening ability. Accordingly, the Vickers hardness HV of the Ti-based nanostructure-dendrite composites obeys the relationship σy <HV/3 <σf. Based on these results, the relationship between the Vickers hardness and the compressive properties of the investigated materials will be discussed by taking the yield and fracture strength (σ y and σf), the strain hardening exponent n, and the elastic and plastic energy stored upon deformation (δΕ and δP) into account.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11661-998-0004-610.1007/s11661-998-0004-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.01410.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.014 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00181-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00181-1 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat79210.1038/nmat792 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.146770710.1063/1.1467707 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.09430110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.094301 ↗
7. 10.2320/matertrans.45.58410.2320/matertrans.45.584 ↗
8. 10.1038/187869b010.1038/187869b0 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00068-410.1016/S1359-6454(01)00068-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00091-X10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00091-X ↗
12. 10.1557/S088376940005325210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00234-110.1016/S1359-6454(98)00234-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-610.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
15. 10.1016/0025-5416(88)90213-310.1016/0025-5416(88)90213-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00469-410.1016/S1359-6462(02)00469-4 ↗
17. 10.2320/matertrans1989.31.17710.2320/matertrans1989.31.177 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00055-610.1016/S1359-6462(02)00055-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.intermet.2004.12.01610.1016/j.intermet.2004.12.016 ↗
20. 10.2320/matertrans1989.31.92910.2320/matertrans1989.31.929 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.00610.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.006 ↗
22. 10.1557/JMR.2003.020510.1557/JMR.2003.0205 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9 ↗
24. Zhang
25. 10.1088/0034-4885/43/4/00110.1088/0034-4885/43/4/001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.02210.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.022 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.11510.1016/j.msea.2003.10.115 ↗
28. 10.2320/matertrans.42.64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.03.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.03.001 ↗
30. 10.1080/0141861000821209610.1080/01418610008212096 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0104535610.1007/BF01045356 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.1993.102810.1557/JMR.1993.1028 ↗
33. 10.1017/CBO978051162312710.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.04550510.1103/PhysRevLett.91.045505 ↗
35. 10.1080/1478643041233131458210.1080/14786430412331314582 ↗
36. 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-510.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
37. 10.1557/JMR.2004.020610.1557/JMR.2004.0206 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0054140310.1007/BF00541403 ↗