An energy-based method to extract plastic properties of metal materials from conical indentation tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on dimensional analysis and finite element computations, an energy-based representative strain for conical indentation in elastoplastic materials has been proposed to establish an explicitly one-to-one relationship between the representative stress σr, the indentation loading curvature C, and the ratio of reversible work We to total work Wt performed by the indenter, i.e., σr/C = F0(We/Wt), where σr is the flow stress corresponding to the representative strain. The relationship provides a very simple method to evaluate the representative stress σr from the three directly measurable quantities We, Wt, and C. Numerical examples and further theoretical analysis reveal that a unique, stable solution can be obtained from the present method for a wide range of material properties, including both highly plastic materials (e.g., Ni for which E/σy = 1070) and highly elastic materials (e.g., materials for which E/σy = 25 and n = 0.5), using indenters with different tip apex angles. Based on the representative strains and stresses given by two indenters with different tip apex angles, e.g., (σr,80, ϵr,80) and (σr,65, ϵr,65), the plastic properties of materials, i.e., the yield strength σy and strain hardening exponent n can be further determined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.2004.030610.1557/JMR.2004.0306 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2003.023410.1557/JMR.2003.0234 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.2003.011310.1557/JMR.2003.0113 ↗
4. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
5. 10.1080/0141861960823972010.1080/01418619608239720 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00186-110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00186-1 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.1999.047210.1557/JMR.1999.0472 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.105971610.1126/science.1059716 ↗
9. 10.1557/JMR.2003.029110.1557/JMR.2003.0291 ↗
10. 10.1080/09500839917669810.1080/095008399176698 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014710.1557/JMR.1998.0147 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.12187310.1063/1.121873 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-310.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
15. Direct measurement of indentation frame compliance10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.325 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-5096(03)00075-910.1016/S0022-5096(03)00075-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00056-410.1016/S0020-7403(00)00056-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00017-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00017-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.00410.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.00110.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.001 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.36819610.1063/1.368196 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00349-110.1016/S0020-7683(97)00349-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.01810.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
28. ABAQUS · 2004
29. Tabor · 1951
30. 10.1080/0141861020823571210.1080/01418610208235712 ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.2002.014410.1557/JMR.2002.0144 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038810.1557/JMR.2002.0388 ↗
33. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01100-310.1016/S0040-6090(03)01100-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00110-510.1016/S0020-7683(02)00110-5 ↗
36. De Guzman · 1993 · 308 · 613
37. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90100-710.1016/0956-7151(93)90100-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
40. 10.1557/JMR.2004.023910.1557/JMR.2004.0239 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.00510.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.005 ↗
42. 10.1557/JMR.1986.060110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
43. 10.1557/JMR.2001.031410.1557/JMR.2001.0314 ↗