Elastoplastic load–depth hysteresis in pyramidal indentation
Source abstract
Abstract
Extensive indentation tests were conducted for nineteen different engineering materials ranging from brittle to ductile materials, and including hard ceramics, ductile metals, and a soft organic polymer. Three tetrahedral pyramid indenters with specific face angles β [shallow pyramid (β = 10°), Vickers (β = 22°), and sharp pyramid (β = 40°) indenters] were used. All the materials tested were subjected to the quadratic load P and penetration depth h relationship P = k1h2 on loading, and most of the tested materials to the quadratic unloading relationship of P = k2(h − hr)2 with the residual depth hr after a complete unload. To determine the contact area at peak indentation load, a specially designed depth-sensing instrument was constructed, on which the contact behavior during loading/unloading was examined by through thickness observation of transparent specimens. All the characteristic indentation parameters were investigated on the basis of simple elastoplastic model, and correlated well with the nondimensional strain E′ tan β/H, in which the elastic modulus E′ was a measure for elasticity, true hardness H was a measure for plasticity, and the inclined face angle β characterized the indenter. The ratio of the conventional Meyer hardness HM to the true hardness H of the materials tested ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 as a function of E′ tan β/H. The cavity model suggested that true hardness H is expressed by the yield stress Y through a constraint factor C as H = C · Y with C ≈ 5.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2001.040810.1557/JMR.2001.0408 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00896-310.1016/S0257-8972(00)00896-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1999.055010.1557/JMR.1999.0550 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1999.049010.1557/JMR.1999.0490 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00349-110.1016/S0020-7683(97)00349-1 ↗
8. Cook · J. Hard Mater · 1994 · 5 · 179
9. 10.1557/JMR.1986.060110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0240283710.1007/BF02402837 ↗
11. Bulychev · Zavod. Lab. · 1975 · 41 · 1137
12. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
13. 26.JIS standard H-3100, Copper and copper alloy sheets, plates, and strips (Japanese Standard Association, 1992).
14. 24.JIS standard B-7735, Vickers hardness test—Calibration of the reference blocks (Japanese Standard Association, 1997).
15. Rowcliffe · J. Hard Mater · 1994 · 5 · 149
16. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
17. 10.1088/0370-1328/78/2/30210.1088/0370-1328/78/2/302 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00316-710.1016/S0022-3093(01)00316-7 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1999.019810.1557/JMR.1999.0198 ↗
20. Tabor · 1951
21. 28.ISO/DIS standard 683-17, Heat-treated steels, alloy steels and free-cutting steels—Part 17: Ball and roller bearing steels (Inter-national Standardization Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997).
22. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
23. 25.JIS standard G-4805, High carbon chromium bearing steels (Japanese Standard Association, Tokyo, Japan, 1999).
24. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-810.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
25. Loubet · 1986 · 72
26. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90194-W10.1016/0956-7151(93)90194-W ↗
27. 10.1557/JMR.1992.061310.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
28. 10.1557/JMR.1996.025010.1557/JMR.1996.0250 ↗
29. 27.ISO standard 426-1, Wrought copper-zinc alloys—Chemical composition and forms of wrought products—Part 1: Non-leaded special copper-zinc alloys (International Standardization Organization, 1983).
30. 10.1557/JMR.2002.007010.1557/JMR.2002.0070 ↗