On the role of ions in the formation of cubic boron nitride films by ion-assisted deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated how ion irradiation can selectively promote the formation of dense sp3-bonded cubic boron nitride (cBN) over the graphite-like sp2-bonded phases. We have conducted a series of experiments using ion-assisted pulsed laser deposition in which either the ion mass (mion) or ion energy (E) was varied in conjunction with the ratio of ion flux to depositing atom flux (J/a). For a fixed ion energy and mass, there is a critical J/a above which cBN formation is initiated, a window of J/a values in which large cBN percentages are obtained, and a point at which J/a is so large that the resputter and deposition rates balance and there is no net film deposition, in agreement with Kester and Messier. As do Kester and Messier, we find that cBN formation is controlled by a combination of experimental parameters that scale with the momentum of the ions. However, unlike Kester and Messier, we do not find that cBN formation scales with the maximum momentum that can be transferred in a single binary collision, as either incorrectly formulated by Targove and Macleod and used by Kester and Messier, or as correctly formulated. Instead we observe that cBN formation best scales with the total momentum of the incident ions, (mionE)1/2. We also consider the mechanistic origins of this (mionE)1/2 dependence. Computer simulations of the interaction of ions with BN show that cBN formation cannot be simply scaled to parameters such as the number of atomic displacements or the number of vacancies produced by the ion irradiation. A critical examination of the literature shows that none of the proposed models satisfactorily accounts for the observed (mionE)1/2 dependence. We present a quantitative model that describes the generation of stress during ion-assisted film growth. The model invokes a kinetic approach to defect production and loss. We apply a simplified version of the model to cBN synthesis, and find that it predicts an approximate (mionE)1/2 dependence for cBN formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.33434110.1063/1.334341 ↗
2. Barbu · Solid State Phenomena · 1993 · 30&31 · 179
3. Eberhardt · 1983
4. 10.1088/0305-4608/12/3/00910.1088/0305-4608/12/3/009 ↗
5. 10.1016/0022-3115(81)90145-810.1016/0022-3115(81)90145-8 ↗
6. 60While ion energy is also lost to phonons and ionization events, in the context of the model the important pathway for energy loss is to defect production.
7. 59 Daley R. S. , Terminello L. J. , Mirkarimi P. B. , and McCarty K. F. , unpublished.
8. 10.1088/0034-4885/18/1/30110.1088/0034-4885/18/1/301 ↗
9. Medlin · 1993 · 311
10. 10.1063/1.10726710.1063/1.107267 ↗
11. 10.1016/0925-9635(93)90262-Z10.1016/0925-9635(93)90262-Z ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1046810.1103/PhysRevB.41.10468 ↗
13. 10.1002/pssa.221047010210.1002/pssa.2210470102 ↗
14. Seitz · 1954 · 2 · 30
15. 10.1116/1.57071910.1116/1.570719 ↗
16. 10.1116/1.57366710.1116/1.573667 ↗
17. Sigmund · 1981 · 1 · 49
18. 10.1103/PhysRev.155.103910.1103/PhysRev.155.1039 ↗
19. 10.1016/0042-207X(86)90123-510.1016/0042-207X(86)90123-5 ↗
20. 24Given that the deposition flux is pulsed, the deposition rate,a, is a time averaged value. Since we are depositing only a small fraction of a monolayer (<0.1 Å) per laser pulse, and the ion-solid interactions occur primarily below the surface, the pulsed deposition source is essentially equivalent to a continuous source for the issues addressed here.
21. Friedmann · J. Appl. Phys.
22. 10.1016/0168-583X(93)90797-A10.1016/0168-583X(93)90797-A ↗
23. 10.1016/0925-9635(93)90260-910.1016/0925-9635(93)90260-9 ↗
24. 10.1364/AO.27.00377910.1364/AO.27.003779 ↗
25. 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90456-Y10.1016/0040-6090(93)90456-Y ↗
26. 10.1016/0921-5093(91)90630-610.1016/0921-5093(91)90630-6 ↗
27. Mishima · 1990 · 54
28. 10.1063/1.173281610.1063/1.1732816 ↗
29. 10.1116/1.57759210.1116/1.577592 ↗
30. Ziegler · 1985
31. 10.1016/0040-6090(88)90008-910.1016/0040-6090(88)90008-9 ↗
32. 3 DeVries R. C. , GE CRD Report No. 72CRD178 (1972).
33. 10.1016/0921-5107(91)90121-B10.1016/0921-5107(91)90121-B ↗
34. 10.1116/1.57370010.1116/1.573700 ↗
35. 10.1116/1.57631210.1116/1.576312 ↗
36. 26The ablated material should have energies of a few tens of eV based on a study of pyrolytic BN ablated in vacuum with comparable laser (248 nm) fluences (D. B. Geoghegan, personal communication); this is small compared to the 500–1200 eV ions used in this study. Also, whatever the energy of the ablated material, it is a constant effect independent of variations in ion energy, current, or mass. That is, neglecting the energy/momentum of the ablated species will not affect the differences used to distinguish between the various parametrizations of cBN formation.
37. Doan · Solid State Phenomena · 1993 · 30&31 · 75
38. 10.1088/0963-0252/2/1/00110.1088/0963-0252/2/1/001 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.172610.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1726 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.34111510.1063/1.341115 ↗
41. 10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.00125310.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.001253 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.33956010.1063/1.339560 ↗
43. 10.1364/AO.28.00276910.1364/AO.28.002769 ↗
44. Friedmann · 1993 · 285 · 507
45. 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90201-Y10.1016/0040-6090(93)90201-Y ↗
46. 10.1116/1.57212410.1116/1.572124 ↗
47. 10.1016/0920-2307(91)90003-610.1016/0920-2307(91)90003-6 ↗
48. 10.1116/1.57818110.1116/1.578181 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.77310.1103/PhysRevLett.67.773 ↗
50. 10.1557/JMR.1992.161810.1557/JMR.1992.1618 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.34933010.1063/1.349330 ↗
52. 10.1116/1.57472210.1116/1.574722 ↗
53. 10.1080/1040843920824458610.1080/10408439208244586 ↗
54. 10.1016/0040-6090(91)90421-S10.1016/0040-6090(91)90421-S ↗
55. 10.1007/978-1-4684-5967-8_810.1007/978-1-4684-5967-8_8 ↗
56. 10.1016/0022-3115(72)90091-810.1016/0022-3115(72)90091-8 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.33792510.1063/1.337925 ↗
58. Gray · 1982
59. 10.1063/1.34717310.1063/1.347173 ↗
60. 63In a constrained film, the stress is biaxial. However, in order to potentially compare with a thermodynamic pressure (p), we give the hydrostatic stress σH = ¾ (σ11 + σ22 +σ33) = –p, where σii are the diagonal components of the stress tensor.
61. Medlin · J. Appl. Phys.
62. 10.1557/JMR.1993.121310.1557/JMR.1993.1213 ↗
63. 10 hBN has been considered to be the thermodynamically stable phase at ambient conditions, but new work suggests that cBN may be the thermodynamically stable phase at ambient condition [see Nakano and Fukunaga, Diamond and Rel. Mater. 2, 1409 (1993), and V.L. Solozhenko, Thermochimican Acta 218, 221 (1993)]. The large activation energy barrier between hBN and cBN is said to account for the difficulty in synthesizing cBN at ambient conditions. Regardless of whether hBN or cBN is the equilibrium phase at ambient conditions, high pressures are required for bulk synthesis.
64. 10.1116/1.57729510.1116/1.577295 ↗
65. 10.1016/0257-8972(91)90189-410.1016/0257-8972(91)90189-4 ↗
66. Wollenberger · 1970 · 215
67. 10.1116/1.58387810.1116/1.583878 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRev.146.54310.1103/PhysRev.146.543 ↗
69. 10.1016/0040-6090(82)90187-010.1016/0040-6090(82)90187-0 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.35188110.1063/1.351881 ↗
71. Murakawa · 1991 · 661