Optimizing solution blow spinning parameters for enhanced porous core–shell fiber production
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optimization of both process and solution parameters is required to facilitate the simultaneous formation of the core–shell fiber components. Here we comprehensively investigated the fabrication of polyvinylpyrrolidone/polyurethane (PVP/PU) core–shell fibers using the solution blow spinning (SBS). We examined how the solvent type and polymer concentration affect polymer solubility and solution spinnability. Additionally, we explored how variations in polymer solution and process parameters influence the morphology and physical properties of core–shell fibers. Our results demonstrate that the concentrations and, subsequently, viscosities of the core and shell polymers determine the core–shell fibers’ morphology. Notably, we successfully produced core–shell fibers featuring a porous PU shell and a water-soluble PVP core. Furthermore, we immobilized model substances in the fiber’s core and determined their release profiles, confirming the potential for controlled release. This innovative approach permits further immobilization of drugs/biomolecules within a stable PVP matrix, enabling their controlled release through the porous PU shell. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. M.F. Abdullah, T. Nuge, A. Andriyana, A.P. Angkawinitwong, Polymers (Basel) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1112200810.3390/POLYM11122008 ↗
2. R.A. Perez, H.W. Kim, Acta Biomater. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2015.03.01310.1016/J.ACTBIO.2015.03.013 ↗
3. B. Pant, M. Park, S.J. Park, Pharmaceutics (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS1107030510.3390/PHARMACEUTICS11070305 ↗
4. A. Martin, J. Cai, A.L. Schaedel, A. Schauer, S. Lendlein, Int. J. Pharm. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2022.12180910.1016/J.IJPHARM.2022.121809 ↗
5. D. Atila, V. Hasirci, A. Tezcaner, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMBBM.2022.10510510.1016/J.JMBBM.2022.105105 ↗
6. C. Xu, J. Ma, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Li, Food Chem. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2022.13425310.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2022.134253 ↗
7. L. Ding, Q. Wang, S. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XCRP.2023.10160310.1016/J.XCRP.2023.101603 ↗
8. S. Das, J. Pérez-Ramírez, J. Gong, P. Dewangan, A. Ramani, Chem. Soc. Rev. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00713J10.1039/C9CS00713J ↗
9. A. Kovtun, A. Bianchi, M. Zambianchi, G. Bozzini, G. Balducci, M. Albonetti, Faraday Discuss. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9FD00117D10.1039/C9FD00117D ↗
10. A. Mitropoulou, D.N. Markatos, A. Dimopoulos, A. Kourkoumelis, G. Kourkoulis, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-024-06777-z10.1007/s10856-024-06777-z ↗
11. M. Doostmohammadi, H. Forootanfar, S. Ramakrishna, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.11052110.1016/J.MSEC.2019.110521 ↗
12. S. Goldman, K. Zadina, T. Moritz, J. Ovitt, R. Sethi, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.06410.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.064 ↗
13. M.F. Elahi, W. Lu, J. Bioeng. Biomed. Sci. (2013). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9538.100012110.4172/2155-9538.1000121 ↗
14. R. Singh, F. Ahmed, P. Polley, J. Giri, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1380910.1021/acsami.8b13809 ↗
15. K. Navas-Gómez, M.F. Valero, Materials (Basel) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1315325010.3390/MA13153250 ↗
16. J.D. Kakisis, C. Antonopoulos, G. Mantas, K. Moulakakis, K. Sfyroeras, J. Vasc. Surg. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2017.06.08310.1016/J.JVS.2017.06.083 ↗
17. M. Movahedi, A. Asefnejad, M. Rafienia, M.T. Khorasani, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.11.23310.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.11.233 ↗
18. L. Maleknia, M. Dilamian, M. Kazemi Pilehrood, H. Sadeghi-Aliabadi, A.H. Hekmati, Res. Pharm. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.22895710.4103/1735-5362.228957 ↗
19. Y. Luo, Y. Hong, L. Shen, F. Wu, X. Lin, AAPS PharmSciTech (2021). https://doi.org/10.1208/S12249-020-01909-410.1208/S12249-020-01909-4 ↗
20. E. Waleka, Z. Stojek, M. Karbarz, Pharmaceutics (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS1305065410.3390/PHARMACEUTICS13050654 ↗
21. A. Kumar, S. Sinha-Ray, Fibers (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/FIB603004510.3390/FIB6030045 ↗
22. P. Franco, I. De Marco, Polymers (Basel) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1205111410.3390/POLYM12051114 ↗
23. Y. Lu, J. Huang, G. Yu, R. Cardenas, S. Wei, E.K. Wujcik, Z. Guo, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/WNAN.139110.1002/WNAN.1391 ↗
24. Y. Han, Y. Lv, J. Chen, M. Yao, C. Wang, P. Hu, Y. Liu, ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAPM.1C0063310.1021/ACSAPM.1C00633 ↗
25. M. Yousefzadeh, F. Ghasemkhah, Handb. Nanofibers (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42789-8_9-110.1007/978-3-319-42789-8_9-1 ↗
26. A.K. Moghe, B.S. Gupta, Polym. Rev. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/1558372080202225710.1080/15583720802022257 ↗
27. M. Li, Y. Zheng, B. Xin, Y. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.IECR.9B0586610.1021/ACS.IECR.9B05866 ↗
28. G.C. Dadol, A. Kilic, L.D. Tijing, H.K. Shon, C.H. Park, Mater. Today Commun. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10165610.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101656 ↗
29. J. Carriles, P. Nguewa, G. González-Gaitano, Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24191475710.3390/ijms241914757 ↗
30. I.M.F. Gonçalves, Í.M. Rocha, E.G. Pires, A.C. Ribeiro, M.C. Pereira, A.J. Almeida, M.T. Silva, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.57182110.3389/fbioe.2020.571821 ↗
31. S. Chan Park, M.J. Kim, K. Choi, J. Kim, D. Kim, H. Kim, RSC Adv. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra05485a10.1039/c8ra05485a ↗
32. A.L.M. Carlos, J.M. Javier, M.L. Dias, R.M.S.M. Thiré, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.5208110.1002/APP.52081 ↗
33. M. Wojasiński, T. Ciach, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5285110.1002/app.52851 ↗
34. J.L. Daristotle, A.M. Behrens, A.D. Sandler, P. Kofinas, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1299410.1021/acsami.6b12994 ↗
35. K. Czarnecka, M. Wojasiński, T. Ciach, P. Sajkiewicz, Materials (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA1406146310.3390/MA14061463 ↗
36. J. Li, G. Song, J. Yu, X. Ding, Y. Zhang, Nanomaterials (Basel) (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO711039510.3390/NANO7110395 ↗
37. I. Łopianiak, B.A. Butruk-Raszeja, Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2121809210.3390/ijms21218092 ↗
38. I. Łopianiak, M. Wojasiński, B. Butruk-Raszeja, Chem. Process. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.24425/cpe.2020.13601210.24425/cpe.2020.136012 ↗
39. M. Li, Y. Zheng, B. Xin, Y. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.IECR.8B0434110.1021/ACS.IECR.8B04341 ↗
40. I.C. Liao, S.Y. Chew, K.W. Leong, Nanomedicine (2006). https://doi.org/10.2217/17435889.1.4.46510.2217/17435889.1.4.465 ↗
41. L.E. Sperling, K.P. Reis, P. Pranke, J.H. Wendorff, Drug Discov. Today (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2016.04.02410.1016/J.DRUDIS.2016.04.024 ↗
42. Y. Wang, L. Liu, Y. Zhu, J. Xu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Pharmaceutics (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1511256110.3390/pharmaceutics15112561 ↗
43. D. Han, A.J. Steckl, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/am402376c10.1021/am402376c ↗
44. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.Y. Tinevez, D.J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, A. Cardona, Nat. Methods (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗