Understanding deformation mechanisms in the grain boundary weakening regime of nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
International audience ; Hall-Petch scaling breaks down at grain sizes below approximate to 10 nm at room temperature. Although mechanisms such as diffusion creep, grain rotation, and grain boundary sliding have been suggested, the dominant deformation mechanism in the Hall-Petch breakdown or grain boundary (GB) weakening regime is not well understood. GB weakening regime has also been attributed to enhanced grain boundary segregation or reduced internal stresses upon annealing. Two different approaches are considered using Ni-W alloys in this work: (a) annealing specimens and examining hardness changes along with variations in GB segregation and (b) modifying electrodeposition conditions slightly to get a range of grain sizes below 10 nm and examining them for GB weakening, without annealing. GB weakening was observed in both approaches. The state of segregation remains unchanged upon annealing in the GB weakening regime. The increased activation volume with reduced grain size in as-deposited alloys is attributed to atomic shuffling at GBs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. E.O. Hall, Proc. Phys. Soc. (1951). https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/30310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
2. N.J. Petch, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25 (1953)
3. Z.C. Cordero, B.E. Knight, C.A. Schuh, Int. Mater. Rev. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.119180810.1080/09506608.2016.1191808 ↗
4. R.B. Figueiredo, M. Kawasaki, T.G. Langdon, Prog. Mater. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.10113110.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101131 ↗
5. A.H. Chokshi, A. Rosen, J. Karch, H. Gleiter, Scr. Metall. (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-610.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6 ↗
6. J. E. Bird, A. K. Mukherjee, J. E. Dorn, (1969) Israel Universities Press
7. A.H. Chokshi, Scr. Mater. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.009 ↗
8. F.A. Mohamed, M. Chauhan, Met. Mater. Trans. A. (2006)
9. R.S. Kottada, A.H. Chokshi, Scripta Mater. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.03510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.035 ↗
10. W. Blum, Y.J. Li, Scripta Mater. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.04110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.041 ↗
11. W.M. Yin, S.H. Whang, R. Mirshams, C.H. Xiao, Mater. Sci. Eng. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01385-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01385-X ↗
12. P.S. Singh, Z. Liang, G.M. Pharr, M.P. de Boer, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13930910.1016/j.msea.2020.139309 ↗
13. G. Palumbo, S.J. Thorpe, K.T. Aust, Scr. Metall. Mater. (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J10.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J ↗
14. H. Hahn, K.A. Padmanabhan, Philos. Mag. B (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/0141863970824112210.1080/01418639708241122 ↗
15. J. Schiøtz, T. Vegge, Sci. Prog. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504990820040310.1177/003685049908200403 ↗
16. H. Van Swygenhoven, M. Spaczer, A. Caro, D. Farkas, Phys. Rev. B (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.2210.1103/PhysRevB.60.22 ↗
17. M. Ke, S.A. Hackney, W.W. Milligan, E.C. Aifantis, Nanostructured Mater. (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9773(95)00281-I10.1016/0965-9773(95)00281-I ↗
18. D.A. Konstantinidis, E.C. Aifantis, Nanostructured Mater. (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(98)00145-710.1016/S0965-9773(98)00145-7 ↗
19. M.Y. Gutkin, I.A. Aifantis, N.V. Skiba, J. Phys. Appl. Phys. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/21/01310.1088/0022-3727/38/21/013 ↗
20. R.B. Figueiredo, T.G. Langdon, J. Mater. Res. Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.01610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.016 ↗
21. T.J. Rupert, J.R. Trelewicz, C.A. Schuh, J. Mater. Res. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.5510.1557/jmr.2012.55 ↗
22. D. Wolf, V. Yamakov, S.R. Phillpot, A.K. Mukherjee, Int. J. Mater. Res. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2003-019910.1515/ijmr-2003-0199 ↗
23. J. Hu, Y.-N. Shi, X. Sauvage, G. Sha, K. Lu, Science (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal516610.1126/science.aal5166 ↗
24. A.H. Chokshi, Mater. Sci. Forum 426, 4393 (2003)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.4393 ↗
25. A. Chokshi and R. S. Kottada, Transactions of the indian institute of metals, 36 (2005)
26. M.P. Phaniraj, M.J.N.V. Prasad, A.H. Chokshi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.11610.1016/j.msea.2006.08.116 ↗
27. H. Van Swygenhoven, P.M. Derlet, A.G. Frøseth, Nat. Mater. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat113610.1038/nmat1136 ↗
28. H. Van Swygenhoven, P.M. Derlet, Phys. Rev. B (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.22410510.1103/PhysRevB.64.224105 ↗
29. E. Bitzek, C. Brandl, P.M. Derlet, H. Van Swygenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.23550110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.235501 ↗
30. A.J. Detor, C.A. Schuh, J. Mater. Res. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2007.040310.1557/JMR.2007.0403 ↗
31. T.J. Rupert, C.A. Schuh, Acta Mater. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.00510.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.005 ↗
32. M.V.N. Vamsi, N.P. Wasekar, G. Sundararajan, Surf. Coat. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.07410.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.074 ↗
33. J. Wang, L. Han, X. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13932610.1016/j.msea.2020.139326 ↗
34. M.P. Seah, J. Phys. F Met. Phys. (1980). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/10/6/00610.1088/0305-4608/10/6/006 ↗
35. A.J. Detor, C.A. Schuh, Acta Mater. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.032 ↗
36. A.J. Detor, M.K. Miller, C.A. Schuh, Philos. Mag. Lett. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/0950083070140012510.1080/09500830701400125 ↗
37. J.R. Trelewicz, C.A. Schuh, Acta Mater. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.020 ↗
38. V. Maier, K. Durst, J. Mueller, B. Backes, H.W. Höppel, M. Göken, J. Mater. Res. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.15610.1557/jmr.2011.156 ↗
39. J.M. Wheeler, V. Maier, K. Durst, M. Göken, J. Michler, Mater. Sci. Eng. A (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.03310.1016/j.msea.2013.07.033 ↗
40. R. J. Asaro and S. Suresh, (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.04710.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
41. F.A. Mohamed, H. Yang, Metall. Mater. Trans. A (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0103-z10.1007/s11661-009-0103-z ↗
42. T.C. Tiearney, N.J. Grant, Metall. Trans. A (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264783910.1007/BF02647839 ↗
43. C.A. Schuh, T.G. Nieh, H. Iwasaki, Acta Mater. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00427-510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00427-5 ↗
44. P. Scherrer, Nachrichten Von Ges. Wiss. Zu Gött. 2, 96 (1918)