journal article·2022-11-14Open access

Dynamics of the gold–silicon eutectic reaction studied at limited length scales using in situ TEM and STEM

Sandra Stangebye, Changhui Lei, Aubri Kinghorn, Ian Robertson, Josh Kacher, Khalid Hattar

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 37· Issue 21

Abstract

The dynamics of the gold–silicon eutectic reaction in limited dimensions were studied using in situ transmission electron microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy heating experiments. The phase transformation, viewed in both plan-view and cross-section of the film, occurs through a complex combination of dislocation and grain boundary motion and diffusion of silicon along gold grain boundaries, which results in a dramatic change in the microstructure of the film. The conversion observed in cross-section shows that the eutectic mixture forms at the Au–Si interface and proceeds into the Au film at a discontinuous growth rate. This complex process can lead to a variety of microstructures depending on sample geometry, heating temperature, and the ratio of gold to silicon which was found to have the largest impact on the eutectic microstructure. The eutectic morphology varied from dendrites to hollow rectangular structures to Au–Si eutectic agglomerates with increasing silicon to gold ratio.Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Zhu, C. Wen, A.A. Aljarb, F. Xue, X. Xu, V. Tung, X. Zhang, H.N. Alshareef, M. Lanza, Nat. Electron. 4, 775–785 (2021)10.1038/s41928-021-00672-z ↗
2. D. Li, Z. Shang, Y. She, Z. Wen, Micromachines 8, 158 (2017)10.3390/mi8050158 ↗
3. Y.T. Cheng, L. Lin, K. Najafi, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 9, 3–8 (2000)10.1109/84.825770 ↗
4. S.M.L. Nai, J. Wei, P.C. Lim, C.K. Wong, in Proc. 5th Electron. Packag. Technol. Conf. EPTC 2003, pp. 119–124 (2003)
5. J. Wu, Y.-L. Shen, K. Reinhardt, H. Szu, B. Dong, Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput. 2013, 1–13 (2012)
6. Y.C. Lin, M. Baum, M. Haubold, J. Frömel, M. Wiemer, T. Gessner, M. Esashi, Development and evalution of AuSi eutectic wafer bonding, in Transducers, pp. 244–247 (2009)10.1109/SENSOR.2009.5285519 ↗
7. M.S. Ashtikar, G.L. Sharma, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 5520–5526 (1995)10.1143/JJAP.34.5520 ↗
8. P.H. Chang, G. Berman, C.C. Shen, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 1473–1477 (1988)10.1063/1.339928 ↗
9. G.A. Andersen, J.L. Bestel, A.A. Johnson, B. Post, Mater. Sci. Eng. 7, 83–90 (1971)10.1016/0025-5416(71)90027-9 ↗
10. B.Y. Tsaur, J.W. Mayer, Philos. Mag. A 43, 345–361 (1981)10.1080/01418618108239414 ↗
11. C. Suryanarayana, T.R. Anantharaman, Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, 73–81 (1974)10.1016/0025-5416(74)90174-8 ↗
12. L. Hultman, A. Robertsson, H.T.G. Hentzell, I. Engström, P.A. Psaras, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 3647 (1998)10.1063/1.339244 ↗
13. T.R. Anantharaman, H.L. Luo, W. Klement, Nature 210, 1040–1041 (1966)10.1038/2101040a0 ↗
14. F.H. Baumann, W. Schroter, Phys. Rev. B. 43, 6510–6510 (1990)10.1103/PhysRevB.43.6510 ↗
15. M. Terauchi, N. Umemoto, Y.K. Sato, M. Ageishi, A.-P. Tsai, Microscopy 00, 1–7 (2021)
16. L. Lin, Y.T. Cheng, K. Najafi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1412 (1998)10.1143/JJAP.37.L1412 ↗
17. H. Liang, B. Xiong, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 35, 055017 (2020)10.1088/1361-6641/ab760c ↗
18. A.K. Green, E. Bauer, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 1284 (1976)10.1063/1.322827 ↗
19. A. Hiraki, E. Lugujjo, J.W. Mayer, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 3643–3649 (1972)10.1063/1.1661782 ↗
20. N. Sumida, K. Ikeda, Ultramicroscopy 39, 313–320 (1991)10.1016/0304-3991(91)90211-N ↗
21. C. Chang, G. Ottaviani, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 901–903 (1984)10.1063/1.94928 ↗
22. A. Cros, C. Canella, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 5, 1041–1048 (1991)10.1163/156856191X00035 ↗
23. M. Seibt, S. Buschbaum, U. Gnauert, W. Schröter, D. Oelgeschläger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 774–777 (1998)10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.774 ↗
24. M. Paulosem, O.K. Varghese, C.A. Grimes, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 3, 341–346 (2003)10.1166/jnn.2003.209 ↗
25. D. Hourlier, P. Perrot, Mater. Sci. Forum. 653, 77–85 (2010)10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.653.77 ↗
26. K. Sekar, G. Kuri, P.V. Satyam, B. Sundaravel, D.P. Mahapatra, B.N. Dev, Solid State Commun. 96, 871–875 (1995)10.1016/0038-1098(95)80105-7 ↗
27. B. Bokhonov, M. Korchagin, J. Alloys Compd. 312, 238–250 (2000)10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01173-7 ↗
28. H. Kato, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 953 (1989)10.1143/JJAP.28.953 ↗
29. E. Philofsky, K.V. Ravi, J. Brooks, E. Hall, J. Electrochem. Soc. 119, 527 (1972)10.1149/1.2404244 ↗
30. G.D. Hibbard, K.T. Aust, U. Erb, J. Mater. Sci. 43, 6441–6452 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-008-2975-5/FIGURES/1210.1007/S10853-008-2975-5/FIGURES/12 ↗
31. J. Kacher, I.M. Robertson, M. Nowell, J. Knapp, K. Hattar, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 1628–1635 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2010.10.10910.1016/J.MSEA.2010.10.109 ↗
32. P.X. Yan, J. Chang, W.L. Wang, X.N. Zhu, M.J. Lin, B. Wei, Acta Mater. 237, 118149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11814910.1016/j.actamat.2022.118149 ↗
33. Z.C. Luo, C.H. Zheng, H.P. Wang, Mater. Charact. 186, 111776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.11177610.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.111776 ↗
34. D.B. Williams, C.B. Carter, Transmission Electron Microscopy, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2009)10.1007/978-0-387-76501-3 ↗
35. K. Hattar, Mater. Today 9, 24 (2006)
36. K.M. Hattar, Thermal and Mechanical Stability of Nanograined FCC Metals (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 2009)
37. Z. Shen, K. Arioka, S. Lozano-Perez, Corros. Sci. 183, 109328 (2021)10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109328 ↗
38. K. Tashiro, G.R. Purdy, Scr. Metall. 21, 361–364 (1987)10.1016/0036-9748(87)90229-8 ↗
39. D.B. Butrymowicz, D.E. Newbury, D. Turnbull, J.M. Cahn, Scr. Metall. 18, 1005–1010 (1984)10.1016/0036-9748(84)90278-3 ↗
40. H. Stange, S. Brunken, D. Greiner, M.D. Heinemann, C.A. Kaufmann, S.S. Schmidt, J.P. Bäcker, M. Klaus, C. Genzel, R. Mainz, Acta Mater. 111, 377–384 (2016)10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.073 ↗
41. I.I. Danzo, Y. Houbaert, K. Verbeken, Surf. Coat. Technol. 251, 15–20 (2014)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.03.063 ↗
42. R.W. Balluffi, J.W. Cahn, Acta Metall. 29, 493–500 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(81)90073-010.1016/0001-6160(81)90073-0 ↗
43. M. Hillert, Scr. Metall. 17, 237–240 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(83)90105-910.1016/0036-9748(83)90105-9 ↗
44. S. Yu, D.J. Siegel, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 38151–38158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1722310.1021/acsami.8b17223 ↗
45. A. Hiraki, M. Nicolet, J.W. Mayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 178–181 (1971)10.1063/1.1653615 ↗
46. S. Mathot, G. Demortier, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 226, 222–230 (2004)10.1016/S0168-583X(04)00871-7 ↗
47. R. Elliott, Eutectic Solidification Processing (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983)
48. A. Reisman, S.T. Edwards, P.L. Smith, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 2848 (1986)10.1149/1.2095446 ↗
49. B. Selikson, Proc. IEEE 57, 1594–1598 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1969.734110.1109/PROC.1969.7341 ↗
50. C. Chang, Y.-F. Wang, Y. Kanamori, J.-J. Shih, Y. Kawai, C.-K. Lee, K.-C. Wu, M. Esashi, J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 580–585 (2005)10.1088/0960-1317/15/3/020 ↗