journal article·2025-03-30Open access

Using experimental data in computationally guided rational design of inorganic materials with machine learning

Heather J. Kulik

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 40· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract While the impact of machine learning (ML) has been felt everywhere, its effect has been most transformative where large, high-quality datasets are available. For promising materials spaces, such as transition metal coordination complexes and metal–organic frameworks, the large chemical diversity has not yet been matched by similarly large datasets, and computational datasets (e.g., from density functional theory) may not be predictive. Extraction of experimental data from the literature represents an alternative approach to the data-driven design of materials. This perspective will describe efforts in (i) extracting experimental data; (ii) associating extracted data with known chemical structures; (iii) leveraging data in ML and screening; (iv) designing materials with enriched stability; and (v) using experimental data to improve high-throughput workflows. I will summarize some of the outstanding challenges and opportunities for data enrichment with high-throughput experimentation and large language models. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. Žídek, A. Potapenko, Highly accurate protein structure prediction with Alphafold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021)10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
2. A. Nandy, C. Duan, M.G. Taylor, F. Liu, A.H. Steeves, H.J. Kulik, Computational discovery of transition-metal complexes: from high-throughput screening to machine learning. Chem. Rev. 121, 9927–10000 (2021)10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 ↗
3. K.D. Vogiatzis, M.V. Polynski, J.K. Kirkland, J. Townsend, A. Hashemi, C. Liu, E.A. Pidko, Computational approach to molecular catalysis by 3d transition metals: challenges and opportunities. Chem. Rev. 119, 2453–2523 (2018)10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00361 ↗
4. G.M. Espallargas, E. Coronado, Magnetic functionalities in mofs: from the framework to the pore. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 533–557 (2018)10.1039/C7CS00653E ↗
5. F.D. Duman, R.S. Forgan, Applications of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as imaging agents in biology and medicine. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 3423–3449 (2021)10.1039/D1TB00358E ↗
6. L.C.-C. Lee, K.K.-W. Lo, Shining new light on biological systems: luminescent transition metal complexes for bioimaging and biosensing applications. Chem. Rev. 124, 8825–9014 (2024)10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00629 ↗
7. K. Lu, T. Aung, N. Guo, R. Weichselbaum, W. Lin, Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for therapeutic, imaging, and sensing applications. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707634 (2018)10.1002/adma.201707634 ↗
8. A. Dhakshinamoorthy, Z. Li, H. Garcia, Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 8134–8172 (2018)10.1039/C8CS00256H ↗
9. J. Lee, O.K. Farha, J. Roberts, K.A. Scheidt, S.T. Nguyen, J.T. Hupp, Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1450–1459 (2009)10.1039/b807080f ↗
10. H. Li, K. Wang, Y. Sun, C.T. Lollar, J. Li, H.-C. Zhou, Recent advances in gas storage and separation using metal-organic frameworks. Mater. Today 21, 108–121 (2018)10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.006 ↗
11. R.B. Lin, S.Y. Liu, J.W. Ye, X.Y. Li, J.P. Zhang, Photoluminescent metal-organic frameworks for gas sensing. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500434 (2016)10.1002/advs.201500434 ↗
12. M. Strianese, C. Pellecchia, Metal complexes as fluorescent probes for sensing biologically relevant gas molecules. Coord. Chem. Rev.. Chem. Rev. 318, 16–28 (2016)10.1016/j.ccr.2016.04.006 ↗
13. H. Yuan, N. Li, W. Fan, H. Cai, D. Zhao, Metal-organic framework based gas sensors. Adv. Sci. 9, 2104374 (2022)10.1002/advs.202104374 ↗
14. J.G. Vries, d., Vries, A. H. D., The power of high-throughput experimentation in homogeneous catalysis research for fine chemicals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 799–811 (2003)10.1002/ejoc.200390122 ↗
15. S.W. Krska, D.A. DiRocco, S.D. Dreher, M. Shevlin, The evolution of chemical high-throughput experimentation to address challenging problems in pharmaceutical synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2976–2985 (2017)10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00428 ↗
16. B. Mahjour, Y. Shen, T. Cernak, Ultrahigh-throughput experimentation for information-rich chemical synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2337–2346 (2021)10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00119 ↗
17. S. DiLuzio, V. Mdluli, T.U. Connell, J. Lewis, V. VanBenschoten, S. Bernhard, High-throughput screening and automated data-driven analysis of the triplet photophysical properties of structurally diverse, heteroleptic iridium (Iii) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1179–1194 (2021)10.1021/jacs.0c12290 ↗
18. R.N. Motz, E.M. Lopato, T.U. Connell, S. Bernhard, High-throughput screening of earth-abundant water reduction catalysts toward photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Inorg. Chem.. Chem. 60, 774–781 (2021)10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02790 ↗
19. V. Mdluli, S. Diluzio, J. Lewis, J.F. Kowalewski, T.U. Connell, D. Yaron, T. Kowalewski, S. Bernhard, High-throughput synthesis and screening of iridium (Iii) photocatalysts for the fast and chemoselective dehalogenation of aryl bromides. ACS Catal.Catal. 10, 6977–6987 (2020)10.1021/acscatal.0c02247 ↗
20. S. DiLuzio, M. Baumer, R. Guzman, H. Kagalwala, E. Lopato, S. Talledo, J. Kangas, S. Bernhard, Exploring the photophysics and photocatalytic activity of heteroleptic Rh (Iii) transition-metal complexes using high-throughput experimentation. Inorg. Chem.. Chem. 63, 14267–14277 (2024)10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c02420 ↗
21. G.G. Terrones, C. Duan, A. Nandy, H.J. Kulik, Low-cost machine learning prediction of excited state properties of transition metal phosphors. Chem. Sci. 14, 1419–1433 (2023)10.1039/D2SC06150C ↗
22. Y. Pal, T.A. Fiala, W.B. Swords, T.P. Yoon, J. Schmidt, Predicting Emission of Heteroleptic Iridium Complexes Using Artificial Chemical Intelligence. ChemPhysChem 25, e202400176 (2024)10.1002/cphc.202400176 ↗
23. T. Kench, A. Rahardjo, G.G. Terrones, A. Bellamkonda, T.E. Maher, M. Storch, H.J. Kulik, R. Vilar, A semi-automated, high-throughput approach for the synthesis and identification of highly photo-cytotoxic iridium complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202401808 (2024)10.1002/anie.202401808 ↗
24. G.G. Terrones, S.-P. Huang, M.P. Rivera, S. Yue, A. Hernandez, H.J. Kulik, Metal-organic framework stability in water and harsh environments from data-driven models trained on the diverse Ws24 data set. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 20333–20348 (2024)10.1021/jacs.4c05879 ↗
25. L. Krasnov, S. Tatarin, D. Smirnov, S. Bezzubov, Ircytotoxdb: a dataset of iridium (Iii) complexes cytotoxicities against various cell lines. Scientific data 11, 870 (2024)10.1038/s41597-024-03735-w ↗
26. Tatarin, S.; Krasnov, L.; Nykhrikova, E.; Minin, M.; Smirnov, D.; Churakov, A.; Bezzubov, S. Predicting Emission Wavelengths and Quantum Yields of Diverse Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium (Iii) Complexes Using Machine Learning. 2024.10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-cchdm ↗
27. M.C. Swain, J.M. Cole, Chemdataextractor: a toolkit for automated extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56, 1894–1904 (2016)10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207 ↗
28. F. Ambroz, T.J. Macdonald, V. Martis, I.P. Parkin, Evaluation of the bet theory for the characterization of meso and microporous Mofs. Small Methods 2, 1800173 (2018)10.1002/smtd.201800173 ↗
29. S. Park, B. Kim, S. Choi, P.G. Boyd, B. Smit, J. Kim, Text mining metal-organic framework papers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 244–251 (2018)10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00608 ↗
30. C.R. Groom, I.J. Bruno, M.P. Lightfoot, S.C. Ward, The Cambridge structural database. Acta Crystallogr. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 72, 171–179 (2016)10.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
31. X. Jia, A. Lynch, Y. Huang, M. Danielson, Anthropogenic biases in chemical reaction data hinder exploratory inorganic synthesis. Nature 573, 251–255 (2019)10.1038/s41586-019-1540-5 ↗
32. P. Raccuglia, K.C. Elbert, P.D. Adler, C. Falk, M.B. Wenny, A. Mollo, M. Zeller, S.A. Friedler, J. Schrier, A.J. Norquist, Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 533, 73–76 (2016)10.1038/nature17439 ↗
33. O. Kononova, T. He, H. Huo, A. Trewartha, E.A. Olivetti, G. Ceder, Opportunities and challenges of text mining in materials research. iScience 24, 102155 (2021)10.1016/j.isci.2021.102155 ↗
34. A. Jain, G. Hautier, S.P. Ong, K. Persson, New opportunities for materials informatics: resources and data mining techniques for uncovering hidden relationships. J. Mater. Res. 31, 977–994 (2016)10.1557/jmr.2016.80 ↗
35. Y. Zhuo, A.M. Tehrani, J. Brgoch, A new era of inorganic materials discovery powered by data science (The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2020)
36. B.J. Bucior, A.S. Rosen, M. Haranczyk, Z. Yao, M.E. Ziebel, O.K. Farha, J.T. Hupp, J.I. Siepmann, A. Aspuru-Guzik, R.Q. Snurr, Identification schemes for metal-organic frameworks to enable rapid search and cheminformatics analysis. Cryst. Growth Des.. Growth Des. 19, 6682–6697 (2019)10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01050 ↗
37. L. Weston, V. Tshitoyan, J. Dagdelen, O. Kononova, A. Trewartha, K.A. Persson, G. Ceder, A. Jain, Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 3692–3702 (2019)10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00470 ↗
38. J.M. Cole, A design-to-device pipeline for data-driven materials discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 599–610 (2020)10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00470 ↗
39. M.C. Ramos, C. Collison, A.D. White, A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry. Chem. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.0160310.48550/arXiv.2407.01603 ↗
40. A. Nandy, C. Duan, H.J. Kulik, Using machine learning and data mining to leverage community knowledge for the engineering of stable metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 17535–17547 (2021)10.1021/jacs.1c07217 ↗
41. Kevlishvili, I.; Michel, R. G. S.; Garrison, A. G.; Toney, J. W.; Adamji, H.; Jia, H.; Roman-Leshkov, Y.; Kulik, H. J. Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Curate the Tmcat, Tmphoto, Tmbio, and Tmsco Datasets of Functional Transition Metal Complexes. Faraday Discussions
42. Y.G. Chung, E. Haldoupis, B.J. Bucior, M. Haranczyk, S. Lee, H. Zhang, K.D. Vogiatzis, M. Milisavljevic, S. Ling, J.S. Camp, B. Slater, J.I. Siepmann, D.S. Sholl, R.Q. Snurr, Advances, updates, and analytics for the computation-ready, experimental metal-organic framework database: core Mof 2019. J. Chem. Eng. Data 64, 5985–5998 (2019)10.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
43. A. White, M. Gibaldi, J. Burner, R.A. Mayo, T. Woo, Alarming structural error rates in Mof databases used in data driven workflows identified via a novel metal oxidation state-based method. Mater. Chem.Chem (2024). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-ftsv310.26434/chemrxiv-2024-ftsv3 ↗
44. Zhao, G.; Brabson, L.; Chheda, S.; Huang, J.; Kim, H.; Liu, K.; Mochida, K.; Pham, T.; Prerna, P.; Terrones, G. G.; Yoon, S.; Zoubrtizky, L.; Coudert, F.-X.; Haranczyk, M.; Kulik, H. J.; Moosavi, S. M.; Sholl, D.; Siepmann, I.; Snurr, R.; Chung, Y. G. Core Mof Db: A Curated Experimental Metal-Organic Framework Database with Machine-Learned Properties for Integrated Material-Process Screening. submitted.
45. A. Nandy, S. Yue, C. Oh, C. Duan, G.G. Terrones, Y.G. Chung, H.J. Kulik, A database of ultrastable mofs reassembled from stable fragments with machine learning models. Matter 6, 1585–1603 (2023)10.1016/j.matt.2023.03.009 ↗
46. P.Z. Moghadam, S.M.J. Rogge, A. Li, C.-M. Chow, J. Wieme, N. Moharrami, M. Aragones-Anglada, G. Conduit, D.A. Gomez-Gualdron, V. Van Speybroeck, D. Fairen-Jimenez, Structure-mechanical stability relations of metal-organic frameworks via machine learning. Matter 1, 219–234 (2019)10.1016/j.matt.2019.03.002 ↗
47. S.M. Moosavi, P.G. Boyd, L. Sarkisov, B. Smit, Improving the mechanical stability of metal-organic frameworks using chemical caryatids. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 832–839 (2018)10.1021/acscentsci.8b00157 ↗
48. R. Batra, C. Chen, T.G. Evans, K.S. Walton, R. Ramprasad, Prediction of water stability of metal-organic frameworks using machine learning. Nature Mach. Intell. 2, 704–710 (2020)10.1038/s42256-020-00249-z ↗
49. N.C. Burtch, H. Jasuja, K.S. Walton, Water stability and adsorption in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 114, 10575–10612 (2014)10.1021/cr5002589 ↗
50. C. Wang, X. Liu, N.K. Demir, J.P. Chen, K. Li, Applications of water stable metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5107–5134 (2016)10.1039/C6CS00362A ↗
51. Z. Zhang, F. Pan, S.A. Mohamed, C. Ji, K. Zhang, J. Jiang, Z. Jiang, Accelerating discovery of water stable metal−organic frameworks by machine learning. Small 20, 2405087 (2024)10.1002/smll.202405087 ↗
52. A. Nandy, C. Duan, C. Goffinet, H.J. Kulik, New strategies for direct methane-to-methanol conversion from active learning exploration of 16 million catalysts. JACS Au 2, 1200–1213 (2022)10.1021/jacsau.2c00176 ↗
53. M.P. Rivera, G.G. Terrones, T.H. Lee, Z.P. Smith, H.J. Kulik, Data-driven screening and discovery of metal-organic frameworks as C2 adsorbents from over 900 experimental isotherms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 64759–64773 (2024)10.1021/acsami.4c14131 ↗
54. T. Bailey, A. Jackson, R.-A. Berbece, K. Wu, N. Hondow, E. Martin, Gradient boosted machine learning model to predict H2, Ch4, and Co2 uptake in metal-organic frameworks using experimental data. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 4545–4551 (2023)10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00135 ↗
55. Z. Zhang, H. Tang, M. Wang, B. Lyu, Z. Jiang, J. Jiang, Metal-organic frameworks for water harvesting: machine learning-based prediction and rapid screening. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 11, 8148–8160 (2023)10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01233 ↗
56. Rohatgi, A. Webplotdigitizer. 2024. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.html. Accessed 02 Jan 2024.
57. Jiang, W.; Schwenker, E.; Spreadbury, T.; Ferrier, N.; Chan, M. K. Y.; Cossairt, O. A Two-Stage Framework for Compound Figure Separation. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.09903arXiv:2101.0990310.1109/ICIP42928.2021.9506171 ↗
58. Schwenker, E.; Jiang, W.; Spreadbury, T.; Ferrier, N.; Cossairt, O.; Chan, M. K. Y. Exsclaim! -- an Automated Pipeline for the Construction of Labeled Materials Imaging Datasets from Literature. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2103.10631arXiv:2103.10631.
59. K.T. Mukaddem, E.J. Beard, B. Yildirim, J.M. Cole, Imagedataextractor: a tool to extract and quantify data from microscopy images. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 2492–2509 (2019)10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00734 ↗
60. Toney, J. W.; Michel, R. G. S.; Garrison, A. G.; Kevlishvili, I.; and; Kulik, H. J. Graph Neural Networks for Predicting Metal–Ligand Coordination of Transition Metal Complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in press, in press.
61. D. Balcells, B.B. Skjelstad, Tmqm dataset-quantum geometries and properties of 86k transition metal complexes. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 6135–6146 (2020)10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01041 ↗
62. A. Nandy, G. Terrones, N. Arunachalam, C. Duan, D.W. Kastner, H.J. Kulik, Mofsimplify, machine learning models with extracted stability data of three thousand metal-organic frameworks. Sci. Data 9, 74 (2022)10.1038/s41597-022-01181-0 ↗
63. J. Burner, L. Schwiedrzik, M. Krykunov, J. Luo, P.G. Boyd, T.K. Woo, High-performing deep learning regression models for predicting low-pressure Co2 adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 27996–28005 (2020)10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06334 ↗
64. R. Gurnani, Z. Yu, C. Kim, D.S. Sholl, R. Ramprasad, Interpretable machine learning-based predictions of methane uptake isotherms in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Mater. 33, 3543–3552 (2021)10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04729 ↗
65. A. Sriram, S. Choi, X. Yu, L.M. Brabson, A. Das, Z. Ulissi, M. Uyttendaele, A.J. Medford, D.S. Sholl, The Open DAC 2023 dataset and challenges for sorbent discovery in direct air capture (ACS Publications, Washington, 2024)
66. M. Suyetin, The application of machine learning for predicting the methane uptake and working capacity of Mofs. Faraday Discuss. 231, 224–234 (2021)10.1039/D1FD00011J ↗
67. J.P. Janet, C. Duan, T. Yang, A. Nandy, H.J. Kulik, A quantitative uncertainty metric controls error in neural network-driven chemical discovery. Chem. Sci. 10, 7913–7922 (2019)10.1039/C9SC02298H ↗
68. H. Adamji, A. Nandy, I. Kevlishvili, Y. Roman-Leshkov, H.J. Kulik, Computational discovery of stable metal-organic frameworks for methane-to-methanol catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 14365–14378 (2023)10.1021/jacs.3c03351 ↗
69. S. Kozuch, S. Shaik, How to conceptualize catalytic cycles? The energetic span model. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 101–110 (2011)10.1021/ar1000956 ↗
70. H. Jin, K.M. Merz, Liganddiff: De Novo ligand design for 3d transition metal complexes with diffusion models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 4377–4384 (2024)10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00232 ↗
71. H. Jin, K.M. Merz, Partial to total generation of 3d transition-metal complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0077510.1021/acs.jctc.4c0077510.1021/acs.jctc.4c0077510.1021/acs.jctc.4c00775 ↗
72. Y. Kang, J. Kim, Chatmof: an artificial intelligence system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks using large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 4705 (2024)10.1038/s41467-024-48998-4 ↗
73. J. Park, Y. Lee, J. Kim, Multi-modal conditioning for metal-organic frameworks generation using 3d modeling techniques. Mat. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-w8fps10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-w8fps ↗
74. Z. Yao, B. Sánchez-Lengeling, N.S. Bobbitt, B.J. Bucior, S.G.H. Kumar, S.P. Collins, T. Burns, T.K. Woo, O.K. Farha, R.Q. Snurr, Inverse design of nanoporous crystalline reticular materials with deep generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 76–86 (2021)10.1038/s42256-020-00271-1 ↗
75. J.P. Janet, L. Chan, H.J. Kulik, Accelerating chemical discovery with machine learning: simulated evolution of spin crossover complexes with an artificial neural network. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1064–1071 (2018)10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170 ↗
76. C. Duan, A. Nandy, G. Terrones, D.W. Kastner, H.J. Kulik, Active learning exploration of transition metal complexes to discover method-insensitive and synthetically accessible chromophores. JACS Au 3, 391–401 (2023)10.1021/jacsau.2c00547 ↗
77. I. Kevlishvili, C. Duan, H.J. Kulik, Classification of hemilabile ligands using machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 11100–11109 (2023)10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02828 ↗
78. D. Zhou, O. Bousquet, T. Lal, J. Weston, B. Schölkopf, Learning with local and global consistency. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 16, 12 (2003)
79. S. Vela, R. Laplaza, Y. Cho, C. Corminboeuf, Cell 2mol: encoding chemistry to interpret crystallographic data. NPJ Comput. Mater.Comput. Mater. 8, 188 (2022)10.1038/s41524-022-00874-9 ↗
80. C. Duan, A.J. Ladera, J.C.-L. Liu, M.G. Taylor, I.R. Ariyarathna, H.J. Kulik, Exploiting ligand additivity for transferable machine learning of multireference character across known transition metal complex ligands. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 4836–4845 (2022)10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00468 ↗
81. E.I. Ioannidis, T.Z.H. Gani, H.J. Kulik, Molsimplify: a toolkit for automating discovery in inorganic chemistry. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 2106–2117 (2016)10.1002/jcc.24437 ↗
82. M.G. Taylor, D.J. Burrill, J. Janssen, E.R. Batista, D. Perez, P. Yang, Architector for high-throughput cross-periodic table 3d complex building. Nat. Commun.Commun. 14, 2786 (2023)10.1038/s41467-023-38169-2 ↗
83. J.-G. Sobez, M. Reiher, Molassembler: molecular graph construction, modification, and conformer generation for inorganic and organic molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3884–3900 (2020)10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00503 ↗
84. Y. Guan, V.M. Ingman, B.J. Rooks, S.E. Wheeler, Aaron: an automated reaction optimizer for new catalysts. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 5249–5261 (2018)10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00578 ↗
85. S.-S. Chen, Z. Meyer, B. Jensen, A. Kraus, A. Lambert, D.H. Ess, Realigands: a ligand library cultivated from experiment and intended for molecular computational catalyst design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 7412–7422 (2023)10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01310 ↗
86. Y. Cho, R. Laplaza, S. Vela, C. Corminboeuf, Automated prediction of ground state spin for transition metal complexes. Dig. Discov. 3, 1638–1647 (2024)10.1039/D4DD00093E ↗
87. Meyer, R.; Chu, D. B. K.; Kulik, H. J. Many-Body Expansion Based Machine Learning Models for Octahedral Transition Metal Complexes. Machine Learning Science & Technology in press, in press.
88. D.B.K. Chu, D.A. González-Narváez, R. Meyer, A. Nandy, H.J. Kulik, Ligand many-body expansion as a general approach for accelerating transition metal complex discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 9397–9412 (2024)10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01728 ↗
89. C.E. Wilmer, M. Leaf, C.Y. Lee, O.K. Farha, B.G. Hauser, J.T. Hupp, R.Q. Snurr, Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 4, 83–89 (2011)10.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
90. P.G. Boyd, A. Chidambaram, E. García-Díez, C.P. Ireland, T.D. Daff, R. Bounds, A. Gładysiak, P. Schouwink, S.M. Moosavi, M.M. Maroto-Valer, J.A. Reimer, J.A.R. Navarro, T.K. Woo, S. Garcia, K.C. Stylianou, B. Smit, Data-driven design of metal-organic frameworks for wet flue gas Co2 capture. Nature 576, 253–256 (2019)10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 ↗
91. Y.J. Colón, D.A. Gómez-Gualdrón, R.Q. Snurr, Topologically guided, automated construction of metal-organic frameworks and their evaluation for energy-related applications. Cryst. Growth Des.. Growth Des. 17, 5801–5810 (2017)10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00848 ↗
92. J. Burner, J. Luo, A. White, A. Mirmiran, O. Kwon, P.G. Boyd, S. Maley, M. Gibaldi, S. Simrod, V. Ogden, T.K. Woo, Arc–Mof: a diverse database of metal-organic frameworks with Dft-derived partial atomic charges and descriptors for machine learning. Chem. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0248510.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0248510.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0248510.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02485 ↗
93. J. Park, Y. Lim, S. Lee, J. Kim, Computational design of metal-organic frameworks with unprecedented high hydrogen working capacity and high synthesizability. Chem. Mater. 35, 9–16 (2022)10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01822 ↗
94. F.T. Szczypiński, S. Bennett, K.E. Jelfs, Can we predict materials that can be synthesised? Chem. Sci. 12, 830–840 (2021)10.1039/D0SC04321D ↗
95. R. Anderson, D.A. Gómez-Gualdrón, Large-scale free energy calculations on a computational metal-organic frameworks database: toward synthetic likelihood predictions. Chem. Mater. 32, 8106–8119 (2020)10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00744 ↗
96. S. Kim, J. Schrier, Y. Jung, Explainable synthesizability prediction of inorganic crystal structures using large language models. Mat. Chem. (2024). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-ltncz10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-ltncz ↗
97. P. Ertl, A. Schuffenhauer, Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J. Cheminf. 1, 1–11 (2009)10.1186/1758-2946-1-8 ↗
98. C.W. Coley, L. Rogers, W.H. Green, K.F. Jensen, Scscore: synthetic complexity learned from a reaction corpus. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 252–261 (2018)10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00622 ↗
99. S. Genheden, A. Thakkar, V. Chadimová, J.L. Reymond, O. Engkvist, E. Bjerrum, Aizynthfinder: a fast, robust and flexible open-source software for retrosynthetic planning. J. Cheminf. 12, 70 (2020)10.1186/s13321-020-00472-1 ↗
100. C.G. Livas, P.N. Trikalitis, G.E. Froudakis, Mofsynth: a computational tool toward synthetic likelihood predictions of Mofs. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 8193–8200 (2024)10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01298 ↗