Coupled Shear Wall with Fully Post-Tensioned Beams and Unbonded Reinforcing Bars at Toes
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Invalid Email Address
Only a short abstract or summary was supplied by the source.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: short
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Barbachyn, B.; Kurama, Y.; McGinnis, M.; and Sause, R., “Testing and Behavior of a Coupled Shear Wall Structure with Partially Post-Tensioned Coupling Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2016, pp. 111-124.
2. Weldon, B., and Kurama, Y., “Nonlinear Behavior of Precast Concrete Coupling Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 133, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1571-1581. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1571)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1571) ↗
3. Weldon, B., and Kurama, Y., “Experimental Evaluation of Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Coupling Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 136, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1066-1077. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000021210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000212 ↗
4. Weldon, B., and Kurama, Y., “Analytical Modeling and Design Validation of Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Coupling Beams for Seismic Regions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 138, No. 2, 2012, pp. 224-234. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000041510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000415 ↗
5. ACI Innovation Task Group 5, “Acceptance Criteria for Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing and Commentary (ACI ITG-5.1-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 19 pp.
6. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.
7. ASCE/SEI 7-10, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010, 650 pp.
8. El-Tawil, S., and Kuenzli, C., “Pushover of Hybrid Coupled Walls. II: Analysis and Behavior,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 128, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1282-1289.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1282) ↗
9. Smith, B., and Kurama, Y., “Seismic Design Guidelines for Solid and Perforated Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls,” PCI Journal, V. 59, No. 3, 2014, pp. 43-59. doi: 10.15554/pcij.06012014.43.5910.15554/pcij.06012014.43.59 ↗
10. Mander, J.; Panthaki, F.; and Kasalanati, A., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Reinforcing Steel,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, V. 6, No. 4, 1994, pp. 453-468. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453) ↗
11. Brown, J., and Kunnath, S., “Low-Cycle Fatigue Failure of Reinforcing Steel Bars,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 457-466.10.14359/13484 ↗
12. ASTM A416-15, “Standard Specification for Low-Relaxation, Seven-Wire Steel Strand for Prestressed Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 5 pp.
13. ASTM A615-15, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 8 pp.
14. ASTM A706-15, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Allow Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.
15. Lehman, D.; Turgeon, J.; Birely, A.; Hart, C.; Marley, K.; Kuchma, D.; and Lowes, L., “Seismic Behavior of a Modern Concrete Coupled Wall,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1371-1381. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000085310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000853 ↗
16. Smith, B.; Kurama, Y.; and McGinnis, M., “Perforated Hybrid Precast Shear Walls for Seismic Regions,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 3, May-June 2015, pp. 359-370. doi: 10.14359/5168741010.14359/51687410 ↗