First-principles identification of localized trap states in polymer nanocomposite interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Ab initio design of polymer nanocomposite materials for high breakdown strength requires prediction of localized trap states at the polymer–filler interface. Systematic first-principles calculations of realistic interfaces can be challenging, particularly for amorphous polymers and fillers that necessitate the calculation of ensembles of large unit cells with hundreds of atoms. We present a computational approach for automatically generating reasonable structures for amorphous polymer–filler interfaces, combining classical molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. We identify trap states by analyzing the localization of electronic eigenstates calculated using density functional theory on ensembles of interface structures, clearly distinguishing shallow trap states from delocalized band-edge states. Applying this approach to silica–polyethylene interfaces as an initial example, we find under-coordination and distorted coordination structures at amorphous silica surfaces contribute a combination of deep and shallow traps at these interfaces, whereas polyethylene does not generate localized interfacial states.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0954-0083/11/3/30410.1088/0954-0083/11/3/304 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.05.01210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.05.012 ↗
3. 10.1002/pssb.222054021110.1002/pssb.2220540211 ↗
4. Unge · 2013 · 935
5. 10.1109/94.32665310.1109/94.326653 ↗
6. The effects of nanoparticles and organic additives with controlled dispersion on dielectric properties of polymers: Charge trapping and impact excitation10.1063/1.4959771 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.497531810.1063/1.4975318 ↗
8. Nelson · 2002 · 295
9. 10.1109/TDEI.2004.134978210.1109/TDEI.2004.1349782 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.490773110.1063/1.4907731 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-6463/aad7e810.1088/1361-6463/aad7e8 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.498365010.1063/1.4983650 ↗
13. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/9/09530310.1088/0022-3727/46/9/095303 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
15. 10.1186/1758-2946-4-1710.1186/1758-2946-4-17 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.02420810.1103/PhysRevB.71.024208 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.507966310.1063/1.5079663 ↗
19. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
20. 10.1109/MEI.2013.641053510.1109/MEI.2013.6410535 ↗
21. On the nature of high field charge transport in reinforced silicone dielectrics: Experiment and simulation10.1063/1.4945373 ↗
22. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
23. Roy · 2019 · 337
24. 10.1063/1.490682810.1063/1.4906828 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.09510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.095 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma203071010.3390/ma2030710 ↗
27. 10.1039/C5CP05740J10.1039/C5CP05740J ↗
28. MacCrone · 2007 · 428
29. 10.1063/1.45854110.1063/1.458541 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.softx.2017.10.00610.1016/j.softx.2017.10.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.00910.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.009 ↗
32. 10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444674810.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446748 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.470734010.1063/1.4707340 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.497823810.1063/1.4978238 ↗
35. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/29/29530510.1088/0022-3727/49/29/295305 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.502370710.1063/1.5023707 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.107710.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1077 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-1-4419-1591-7_510.1007/978-1-4419-1591-7_5 ↗
39. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
40. Unge · 2012 · 525
41. 10.1002/eej.2113610.1002/eej.21136 ↗