Effects of angular misalignment on material property characterization by nanoindentation with a cylindrical flat-tip indenter
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoindentation techniques are commonly used to characterize nanomechanical properties of microscaled and nanoscaled materials. Nanoindentation using a cylindrical flat-tip indenter has a constant contact area which makes it a reliable source to find material’s yield strength as well as other mechanical properties. However, an angular misalignment of the indenter with the specimen results in experimental error. In this work, the effects of angular misalignment on the nanoindentation testing with a cylindrical flat-tip indenter were numerically analyzed. A three-dimensional nanoindentation solid model was generated, computer modeling based on finite element analysis was conducted. The angle of misalignment ranged from 0° to 1°. Young’s modulus and hardness were evaluated. Based on the hemispherical stress–strain distribution assumption of an elastic plastic indentation, corrected depths and modifiers were proposed for adjusting material’s 0.1% offset and 0.2% offset yield strengths. Low carbon steel AISI 1018 was selected as sample material for indentation testing and modeling validation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanoindentation study of polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus using Berkovich and flat punch tips10.1002/app.41384 ↗
2. 20. Kashani M.S. : Sources of error in relating nanoindentation results to material properties. Ph.D. thesis, Wichita State University, USA, 2010.
3. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
4. 10.1557/jmr.2015.410.1557/jmr.2015.4 ↗
5. 2. American Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM E2546-07 Standard Practice for Instrumented Indentation Testing, ASTM International (2007).
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.02410.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.024 ↗
7. Fischer-Cripps · 2011
8. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.07310.1016/j.tsf.2015.11.073 ↗
9. 17. Srivastava A. : Dynamic friction measurement and modeling at the micro/nano scale. Ph.D. thesis, University of california, USA, 2006.
10. 10.2320/matertrans.M201240010.2320/matertrans.M2012400 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.009 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.296925010.1115/1.2969250 ↗
13. Davis · 1998 · 153
14. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01087.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01087.x ↗
15. 24. ANSYS Inc.: ANSYS Theory Reference Manual. ANSYS version15.0, 2015.
16. 1. International Organization for Standardization: ISO/DIS 14577-1 Metallic Materials-Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters—Part 1: Test Method (2002).
17. 10.1002/mawe.20060001310.1002/mawe.200600013 ↗
18. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/11/11541510.1088/0022-3727/41/11/115415 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.07110.1016/j.msea.2013.08.071 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mex.2015.09.00410.1016/j.mex.2015.09.004 ↗
21. Baker · 1991 · 97
22. 10.1016/0167-6636(92)90020-E10.1016/0167-6636(92)90020-E ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030010.1557/JMR.1999.0300 ↗
24. 11. Chunyu Z. : Characterization of the mechanical properties of visco-elastic and visco-elastic-plastic materials by nanoindentation tests. PhD. Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2007.
25. 10.1080/1478643060117551610.1080/14786430601175516 ↗
26. Zohuri · 2015 · 9310.1007/978-3-319-13476-5_2 ↗
27. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000101)38:1<10::AID-POLB2>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000101)38:1<10::AID-POLB2>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗