On the effective load during nanoindentation creep testing with continuous stiffness measurement (CSM)
Source abstract
Abstract
The ability to accurately determine the applied load is critical in measuring hardness, which is traditionally defined as the ratio of the applied load to the projected contact area in the case of instrumented indentation. The magnitude of the applied load is unambiguous when the load is monotonically increased or held constant. However, in the case of nanoindentation testing with continuous stiffness measurement (CSM), wherein an oscillatory load is superimposed on the primary load, what one should use for the load has significant implications especially for rate-dependent materials. In this work, a concept of an effective load during nanoindentation creep testing with CSM is proposed based on a theoretical analysis. The analytical model is experimentally validated, and good agreement is found with the experimental results, even when the material exhibits a strong indentation size effect (ISE). The findings of this work have important implications for accurately measuring the rate dependence of hardness, especially during high-temperature nanoindentation testing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.1992.156410.1557/jmr.1992.1564 ↗
2. B. Merle, V. Maier-Kiener, G.M. Pharr, Influence of modulus-to-hardness ratio and harmonic parameters on continuous stiffness measurement during nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 134, 167–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.03610.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.036 ↗
3. B. Merle, W.H. Higgins, G.M. Pharr, Critical issues in conducting constant strain rate nanoindentation tests at higher strain rates. J. Mater. Res. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.29210.1557/jmr.2019.292 ↗
4. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
5. J. Hay, P. Agee, E. Herbert, Continuous stiffness measurement during instrumented indentation testing. Exp. Tech. 34, 86–94 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00618.x ↗
6. W.C. Oliver, J.B. Pethica, Method for continuous determination of the elastic stiffness of contact between two bodies, U.S. Patent 4,848,141, 18 July 1989, 1989
7. B. Merle, W.H. Higgins, G.M. Pharr, Extending the range of constant strain rate nanoindentation testing. J. Mater. Res. 35, 343–352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.40810.1557/jmr.2019.408 ↗
8. S.A.S. Asif, K.J. Wahl, R.J. Colton, Nanoindentation and contact stiffness measurement using force modulation with a capacitive load–displacement transducer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 2408–2413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.114976910.1063/1.1149769 ↗
9. X. Li, B. Bhushan, A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater. Charact. 48, 11–36 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
10. P. Sudharshan Phani, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by load and depth sensing indentation: improvements to the technique based on continuous stiffness measurement. J. Mater. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00131-710.1557/s43578-021-00131-7 ↗
11. I.C. Choi, C. Brandl, R. Schwaiger, Thermally activated dislocation plasticity in body-centered cubic chromium studied by high-temperature nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 140, 107–115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.02610.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.026 ↗
12. V. Maier, B. Merle, M. Göken, K. Durst, An improved long-term nanoindentation creep testing approach for studying the local deformation processes in nanocrystalline metals at room and elevated temperatures. J Mater. Res. 28, 1177–1188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2013.3910.1557/jmr.2013.39 ↗
13. G.M. Pharr, J.H. Strader, W.C. Oliver, Critical issues in making small-depth mechanical property measurements by nanoindentation with continuous stiffness measurement. J. Mater. Res. 24, 653–666 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.009610.1557/jmr.2009.0096 ↗
14. P.S. Phani, W.C. Oliver, A direct comparison of high temperature nanoindentation creep and uniaxial creep measurements for commercial purity aluminum. Acta Mater. 111, 31–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.03210.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.032 ↗
15. M.J. Mayo, W.D. Nix, A micro-indentation study of superplasticity in Pb, Sn, and Sn–38 wt% Pb. Acta Metall. 36, 2183–2192 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(88)90319-710.1016/0001-6160(88)90319-7 ↗
16. P. Sudharshan Phani, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, On the measurement of power law creep parameters from instrumented indentation. JOM 69, 2229–2236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2535-z10.1007/s11837-017-2535-z ↗
17. B. Lucas, An experimental investigation of creep and viscoelastic properties using depth-sensing indentation techniques, PhD Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1997. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk%7B_%7Dgraddiss/1255/
18. W.H. Poisl, B.D. Fabes, The relationship between indentation and uniaxial creep in amorphous selenium. J. Mater. Res. (1995). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1995.202410.1557/JMR.1995.2024 ↗
19. P. Sadrabadi, K. Durst, M. Göken, Study on the indentation size effect in CaF2: dislocation structure and hardness. Acta Mater. 57, 1281–1289 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.01510.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.015 ↗
20. C. Minnert, W.C. Oliver, K. Durst, New ultra-high temperature nanoindentation system for operating at up to 1100°C. Mater. Des. 192, 108727 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10872710.1016/j.matdes.2020.108727 ↗
21. K. Durst, V. Maier, Dynamic nanoindentation testing for studying thermally activated processes from single to nanocrystalline metals. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 19, 340–353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.00110.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.001 ↗
22. Y. Zhang, D.P. Mohanty, P. Seiler, T. Siegmund, J.J. Kruzic, V. Tomar, High temperature indentation based property measurements of Inconel IN-617. Int. J. Plast. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.05.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2017.05.007 ↗
23. J.M. Wheeler, D.E.J. Armstrong, W. Heinz, R. Schwaiger, High temperature nanoindentation: the state of the art and future challenges. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 19, 354–366 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.00210.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.002 ↗
24. C. Su, E.G. Herbert, S. Sohn, J.A. LaManna, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of power-law creep parameters by instrumented indentation methods. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61, 517–536 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2012.09.00910.1016/j.jmps.2012.09.009 ↗
25. P. Sudharshan Phani, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Influences of elasticity on the measurement of creep and strain rate sensitivity by nanoindentation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids (2021) (under review)
26. I.N. Sneddon, The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
27. P.S. Phani, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Understanding and modeling plasticity error during nanoindentation with continuous stiffness measurement. Mater. Des. 194, 108923 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10892310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108923 ↗
28. P.S. Phani, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, An experimental assessment of methods for mitigating plasticity error during nanoindentation with continuous stiffness measurement. Mater. Des. 194, 108924 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10892410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108924 ↗