Superior tensile properties of FDM 3D-printed TPU/E-TPU layered structure
Source abstract
Abstract
The study examines 3D printing technology for robust and flexible prototypes, concentrating on FDM to improve the tensile properties of multilayer TPU and conductive TPU. This research aims at the mechanical properties of layered materials to evaluate how effectively rapid prototyping approaches adhere to robust and soft components. The research evaluated five TPU/E-TPU filaments that additively produced multilayer assemblies: Models (TET), (ETE), (TETE/ETET), (pure TPU), and (pure E-TPU). Models of pure TPU and pure E-TPU serve as standards for comparison. We tailored three input parameters at three levels each: layer thickness, printing speed, and extruder temperature. The experimental results of TET (emphasizing flexibility) and ETE (prioritizing electric conductivity)-layered model arrangements lead to the best mechanical properties. The ANOVA results for the tensile strength extension response models;R2= 75.7%; adjustedR2= 69.3%; and the tensile strain at yield isR2= 71.4%; adjustedR2= 65.7%.Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. A. Ryspayeva, T.D.A. Jones, S.R. Khan, M.N. Esfahani, M.P. Shuttleworth, R.A. Harris, R.W. Kay, M.P.Y. Desmulliez, J. Marques-Hueso, IEEE Access 7, 104947–104955 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.293159410.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931594 ↗
2. P. Alagi, Y.J. Choi, S.C. Hong, Eur. Polym. J. 78, 46–60 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.00310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.003 ↗
3. H. Xia, Y. Hashimoto, Q.Q. Ni, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 301(7), 864–869 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20160005010.1002/mame.201600050 ↗
4. D. Pedrazzoli, I. Manas-Zloczower, Polymer (Guildf.) 90, 256–263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.02210.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.022 ↗
5. T. Ohki, Q.Q. Ni, N. Ohsako, M. Iwamoto, Composites A 35(9), 1065–1073 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.001 ↗
6. N. Elmrabet, P. Siegkas, Polym. Test. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10665610.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106656 ↗
7. A.S. de León, A. Domínguez-Calvo, S.I. Molina, Mater. Des. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10804410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108044 ↗
8. E. Brancewicz-Steinmetz, J. Sawicki, P. Byczkowska, Materials (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1421646410.3390/ma14216464 ↗
9. A. Rudawska, Appl. Mech. 2(1), 108–126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech201000710.3390/applmech2010007 ↗
10. L. Wang, J.E. Sanders, D.J. Gardner, Y. Han, Prog. Addit. Manuf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-310.1007/s40964-018-0053-3 ↗
11. M. Reulier, L. Avérous, Eur. Polym. J. 67, 418–427 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.03610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.036 ↗
12. T.J. Suteja, A. Soesanti, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/04201010.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042010 ↗
13. J.C. Camargo, Á.R. Machado, E.C. Almeida, E.F.M.S. Silva, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 103(5–8), 2423–2443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03532-510.1007/s00170-019-03532-5 ↗
14. C. Dudescu, L. Racz, Acta Univ. Cibiniensis 69(1), 23–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/aucts-2017-000410.1515/aucts-2017-0004 ↗
15. L. Roy Xu, A. Karakoҫ, M. Flores, H. Ning, E. Taciroglu, Compos. Struct. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11511010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115110 ↗
16. J.W. Hutchinson, Z. Suo, Adv. Appl. Mech. 29(C), 63–191 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
17. N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, E. Velidakis, M. Liebscher, V. Mechtcherine, L. Tzounis, Polymers (Basel) 12(12), 1–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1212292410.3390/polym12122924 ↗
18. P. Mistry, R. Chhabra, S. Muke, A. Narvekar, S. Sathaye, R. Jain, P. Dandekar, Mater. Sci. Eng. C (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11131610.1016/j.msec.2020.111316 ↗
19. J.Z. Gul, M. Sajid, K.H. Choi, J. Mater. Chem. C 8(7), 2597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tc90027c10.1039/d0tc90027c ↗
20. X. Xiao, J. Wang, D. Cai, L. Lou, F. Xiao, Transp. Geotech. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10050310.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100503 ↗
21. C. Wang, A. Hausberger, M. Berer, G. Pinter, F. Grün, T. Schwarz, Polym. Test. 72, 271–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.03710.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.037 ↗
22. J. Choi, D.S. Moon, J.U. Jang, W. Bin Yin, B. Lee, K.J. Lee, Polymer (Guildf.) 116, 287–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.08310.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.083 ↗
23. K. Kim, J. Park, J. Hoon Suh, M. Kim, Y. Jeong, I. Park, Sens. Actuators A 263, 493–500 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.02010.1016/j.sna.2017.07.020 ↗
24. C.J. Hohimer, G. Petrossian, A. Ameli, C. Mo, P. Pötschke, Addit. Manuf. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10128110.1016/j.addma.2020.101281 ↗
25. G. Verstraete, A. Samaro, W. Grymonpré, V. Vanhoorne, B. Van Snick, M.N. Boone, T. Hellemans, L. Van Hoorebeke, J.P. Remon, C. Vervaet, Int. J. Pharm. 536(1), 318–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.12.00210.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.12.002 ↗
26. J. Liu, W. Li, Y. Guo, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Composites A 120, 140–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.026 ↗
27. K.S. Kang, C. Jee, J.H. Bae, H.J. Jung, P.H. Huh, Mater. Lett. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12669810.1016/j.matlet.2019.126698 ↗
28. B. Guo, X. Ji, W. Wang, X. Chen, P. Wang, L. Wang, J. Bai, Composites B (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10859810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108598 ↗
29. N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, E. Velidakis, L. Tzounis, N. Mountakis, A. Korlos, P.E. Fischer-Griffiths, S. Grammatikos, Polymers (Basel) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1312202910.3390/polym13122029 ↗
30. N. Naveed, Mater. Technol. 36(5), 317–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2020.175847510.1080/10667857.2020.1758475 ↗
31. Z. Abdullah, H.Y. Ting, M.A.M. Ali, M.H.F.M. Fauadi, M.S. Kasim, A. Hambali, M.M. Ghazaly, F. Handoko, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 12(Special Issue 4), 147–158 (2018)
32. F. Rayegani, G.C. Onwubolu, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 73(1–4), 509–519 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-210.1007/s00170-014-5835-2 ↗
33. P. Srivastava, P. Sahlot, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (Springer, Singapore, 2023)
34. A. Alafaghani, A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, A. Guzman, Procedia Manuf. 10, 791–803 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07910.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079 ↗
35. O.A. Mohamed, S.H. Masood, J.L. Bhowmik, Adv. Manuf. 3(1), 42–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-710.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
36. H.K. Garg, R. Singh, Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 7(1), 981–992 (2013). https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.7.2012.14.007910.15282/ijame.7.2012.14.0079 ↗
37. ISO/ASTM, ISO/ASTM 52900, vol. 5 (International Organization for Standardization, 2021), pp. 1–26
38. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E) ii. Additive manufacturing-General Principles-Terminology. (ASTM International, 2015), pp. 1–28. www.iso.orgwww.astm.org
39. V. Dikshit, A.P. Nagalingam, Y.L. Yap, S.L. Sing, W.Y. Yeong, J. Wei, Mater. Des. 137, 140–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.01410.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.014 ↗
40. D.M.B. Lopez, R. Ahmad, Polymers (Basel) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1203065110.3390/polym12030651 ↗
41. X. Wang, L. Zhao, J.Y.H. Fuh, H.P. Lee, Polymers (Basel) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1107115410.3390/polym11071154 ↗
42. M. Fernandez-Vicente, W. Calle, S. Ferrandiz, A. Conejero, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 3(3), 183–192 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.003610.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
43. C. Casavola, A. Cazzato, V. Moramarco, C. Pappalettere, Mater. Des. 90, 453–458 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009 ↗
44. W. Wu, P. Geng, G. Li, D. Zhao, H. Zhang, J. Zhao, Materials 8(9), 5834–5846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
45. S. Tu, X. Ren, J. He, Z. Zhang, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1313410.1111/ffe.13134 ↗
46. P. Das, S. Ganguly, P.K. Marvi, M. Sherazee, S.R. Ahmed, X. Tang, S. Srinivasan, A.R. Rajabzadeh, Adv. Funct. Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20231452010.1002/adfm.202314520 ↗
47. S. Mandal, G.K. Nagi, A.A. Corcoran, R. Agrawal, M. Dubey, R.W. Hunt, Carbohydr. Polym. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1515315310.3390/polym15153153 ↗