Accelerating training of MLIPs through small-cell training
Source abstract
Abstract
While machine-learned interatomic potentials have become a mainstay for modeling materials, designing training sets that lead to robust potentials is challenging. Automated methods, such as active learning and on-the-fly learning, construct reliable training sets, but these processes can be resource-intensive. Current training approaches often use density functional theory (DFT) calculations that have the same cell size as the simulations that the potential is explicitly trained to model. Here, we demonstrate an easy-to-implement small-cell training protocol and use it to model the Zr-H system. This training leads to a potential that accurately predicts known stable Zr-H phases and reproduces the α-β pure zirconium phase transition in molecular dynamics simulations. Compared to traditional active learning, small-cell training decreased the training time of the α-β zirconium phase transition by approximately 20 times. The potential describes the phase transition with a degree of accuracy similar to that of the large-cell training method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. V.L. Deringer, M.A. Caro, G. Csányi, Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019)10.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
2. Y. Lysogorskiy, C.V.D. Oord, A. Bochkarev, S. Menon, M. Rinaldi, T. Hammerschmidt, M. Mrovec, A. Thompson, G. Csányi, C. Ortner, R. Drautz, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 97 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00559-910.1038/s41524-021-00559-9 ↗
3. A.V. Shapeev, Multisc. Model. Simul. 14, 1153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1137/15M105418310.1137/15M1054183 ↗
4. J. Behler, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17930 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21668F10.1039/C1CP21668F ↗
5. W.J. Szlachta, A.P. Bartók, G. Csányi, Phys. Rev. B 90, 104108 (2014)10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104108 ↗
6. A.P. Bartók, M.C. Payne, R. Kondor, G. Csányi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010)10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
7. J.A. Vita, D.R. Trinkle, Comput. Mater. Sci. 200, 110752 (2021)10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110752 ↗
8. A.P. Bartók, R. Kondor, G. Csányi, Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013)10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
9. C.W. Rosenbrock, K. Gubaev, A.V. Shapeev, L.B. Pártay, N. Bernstein, G. Csányi, G.L.W. Hart, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00477-210.1038/s41524-020-00477-2 ↗
10. M.S. Daw, M.I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.128510.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1285 ↗
11. M.S. Daw, M.I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
12. A. Takahashi, A. Seko, I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 063801 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.063801 ↗
13. E. Wimmer, M. Christensen, W. Wolf, W.H. Howland, B. Kammenzind, R.W. Smith, J. Nucl. Mater. 532, 152055 (2020)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152055 ↗
14. S. Starikov, D. Smirnova, Comput. Mater. Sci. 197, 110581 (2021)10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110581 ↗
15. O.G. Nicholls, D.G. Frost, V. Tuli, J. Smutna, M.R. Wenman, P.A. Burr, J. Nucl. Mater. 584, 154391 (2023)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154391 ↗
16. A.P. Bartók, J. Kermode, N. Bernstein, G. Csányi, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041048 (2018)
17. E.V. Podryabinkin, A.V. Shapeev, Comput.l Mater. Sci. 140, 171 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 ↗
18. M. Hodapp, A. Shapeev, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 113802 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.113802 ↗
19. E.V. Podryabinkin, E.V. Tikhonov, A.V. Shapeev, A.R. Oganov, Phys. Rev. B 99, 064114 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064114 ↗
20. L. Zhang, D.Y. Lin, H. Wang, R. Car, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 023804 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.023804 ↗
21. I.S. Novikov, K. Gubaev, E.V. Podryabinkin, A.V. Shapeev, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2021)10.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe ↗
22. A. Shapeev, K. Gubaev, E. Tsymbalov, E. Podryabinkin, Active Learning and Uncertainty Estimation, in Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics. ed. by K.T. Schütt, S. Chmiela, O.A. von Lilienfeld, A. Tkatchenko, K. Tsuda, K.R. Müller (Springer, Cham, 2020), pp.309–32910.1007/978-3-030-40245-7_15 ↗
23. C.J. Pickard, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.01410210.1103/PhysRevB.106.014102 ↗
24. S. Kass, J. Electrochem. Soc. 107, 594 (1960)10.1149/1.2427781 ↗
25. C.R.F. Azevedo, Eng. Fail. Anal. 18, 1943 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.01010.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.010 ↗
26. B. Kammenzind, B. Berquist, R. Bajaj, P. Kreyns, D. Franklin, STP 1354, 196 (2000)
27. J. Kearns, J. Nucl. Mater. 22, 292 (1967)10.1016/0022-3115(67)90047-5 ↗
28. Z. Duan, H. Yang, Y. Satoh, K. Murakami, S. Kano, Z. Zhao, J. Shen, H. Abe, Nucl. Eng. Des. 316, 131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.03110.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.031 ↗
29. A.T. Motta, L. Capolungo, L.-Q. Chen, M.N. Cinbiz, M.R. Daymond, D.A. Koss, E. Lacroix, G. Pastore, P.C.A. Simon, M.R. Tonks, B.D. Wirth, M.A. Zikry, J. Nucl. Mater. 518, 440 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.04210.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.042 ↗
30. C. Ells, J. Nucl. Mater. 28, 129 (1968)10.1016/0022-3115(68)90021-4 ↗
31. R. Daum, Y. Chu, A. Motta, J. Nucl. Mater. 392, 453 (2009)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.004 ↗
32. F. Long, N. Badr, Z. Yao, M. Daymond, J. Nucl. Mater. 543, 152540 (2021)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152540 ↗
33. R. Beck, Am. Soc. Metals Trans. Quart. 55, 1–10 (1962)
34. G. Carpenter, Acta Metall. 26, 1225 (1978)10.1016/0001-6160(78)90006-8 ↗
35. G. McRae, C. Coleman, J. Nucl. Mater. 499, 622 (2018)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.09.017 ↗
36. N. Badr, F. Long, Y. Luo, M. Topping, L. Béland, Z. Yao, M. Daymond, Acta Mater. 247, 118729 (2023)10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118729 ↗
37. L. Lanzani, M. Ruch, J. Nucl. Mater. 324, 165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.01310.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.013 ↗
38. E. Tulk, M. Kerr, M. Daymond, J. Nucl. Mater. 425, 93 (2012)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.051 ↗
39. G. Carpenter, J. Nucl. Mater. 48, 264 (1973)10.1016/0022-3115(73)90022-6 ↗
40. I.C. Njifon, E. Torres, Acta Mater. 202, 222 (2021)10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.030 ↗
41. C. Domain, R. Besson, A. Legris, Acta Mater. 50, 3513 (2002)10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00173-8 ↗
42. Y. Udagawa, M. Yamaguchi, H. Abe, N. Sekimura, T. Fuketa, Acta Mater. 58, 3927 (2010)10.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.034 ↗
43. W. Zhu, R. Wang, G. Shu, P. Wu, H. Xiao, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 22361 (2010)10.1021/jp109185n ↗
44. F. Wang, H. Gong, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 12393 (2012)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.037 ↗
45. P. Olsson, A. Massih, J. Blomqvist, A.M.A. Holston, C. Bjerkén, Comput. Mater. Sci. 86, 211 (2014)10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.043 ↗
46. X. Zhu, D.Y. Lin, J. Fang, X.Y. Gao, Y.F. Zhao, H.F. Song, Comput. Mater. Sci. 150, 77 (2018)10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.066 ↗
47. M. Christensen, W. Wolf, C. Freeman, E. Wimmer, R. Adamson, L. Hallstadius, P. Cantonwine, E. Mader, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 025402 (2015)10.1088/0953-8984/27/2/025402 ↗
48. G.Y. Huang, B.D. Wirth, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 135105 (2019)10.1063/1.5102176 ↗
49. G.L.W. Hart, R.W. Forcade, Phys. Rev. B 77, 224115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.22411510.1103/PhysRevB.77.224115 ↗
50. G.L.W. Hart, R.W. Forcade, Phys. Rev. B 80, 014120 (2009)10.1103/PhysRevB.80.014120 ↗
51. L. Zhang, Y.H. Li, Y.Q. Gu, L.C. Cai, Sci. Rep. 9, 16889 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53088-310.1038/s41598-019-53088-3 ↗
52. E. Zuzek, J. Abriata, A. San-Martin, F. Manchester, Phase Diagrams of Binary Hydrogen Alloys (ASM International, Almere, 2000), p.309
53. E. Zuzek, J. Abriata, A. San-Martin, F. Manchester, Phase Diagrams of Binary Hydrogen Alloys (ASM International, Almere, 1990), p.385
54. C. Nyshadham, C. Oses, J.E. Hansen, I. Takeuchi, S. Curtarolo, G.L.W. Hart, Acta Mater. 122, 438 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.01710.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.017 ↗
55. O. Levy, G.L.W. Hart, S. Curtarolo, Acta Mater. 58, 2887 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.01710.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.017 ↗
56. O. Levy, G.L.W. Hart, S. Curtarolo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4830 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja910562310.1021/ja9105623 ↗
57. K. Gubaev, E.V. Podryabinkin, G.L.W. Hart, A.V. Shapeev, Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.031 ↗
58. W.S. Morgan, G.L.W. Hart, R.W. Forcade, Comput. Mater. Sci. 136, 144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.01510.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.015 ↗
59. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
60. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996b). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
61. Y. Li, R. Rogge, R. Holt, J. Nuclear Mater. 437, 10 (2006)
62. A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. Int Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
63. P. Liu, C. Verdi, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 053804 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.053804 ↗
64. The parameters used for the VASP calculations of this training set were not the same as the parameters shown in Table 2. However, the only significant parameter change from the parameters in Table 2 was a change in ENCUT from 400 eV to 500 eV. Because 400 eV is a reasonable value of ENCUT for the Zr system, this should not affect the training results significantly
65. S.P. Ong, W.D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V.L. Chevrier, K.A. Persson, G. Ceder, Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
66. A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, I. Tanaka, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35, 353001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acd83110.1088/1361-648X/acd831 ↗