Preparation of biosilica glass-based porous scaffolds using various elements (Mg–Zn, Mg–Cu, and Sr–Cu) as bioactive glass co-dopants: In vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility behaviors
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present study, bioactive biosilica glass-based porous scaffolds have been produced by the dual incorporation of Mg, Zn, Sr, and Cu into glasses. Structural analysis indicated that co-dopants resulted in changes in the network connectivity as well as in the oxygen density values of biosilica glass network. Results also showed that scaffolds had suitable pore size range (100–400 µm) and porosity (82–85%). While the co-incorporation of MgO and CuO resulted in the lowest crystal apatite size (6.5 nm) on the scaffold surface, the co-incorporation of SrO and CuO resulted in highest (9.7 nm) at the end of 28th day in simulated body fluid (SBF). Porous scaffolds showed biocompatible features (up to 100 mg/ml) and had positive impact on cells according to indirect cell study, especially at 25 mg/ml. The results demonstrated that these biocompatible porous scaffolds with appropriate degradation and bioactivity properties are prominent candidates for bone treatment. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. R.V. Baier, J.I.C. Raggio, C.M. Giovanetti, H. Palza, I. Burda, G. Terrasi, B. Weisse, G.S. De Freitas et al., Shape fidelity, mechanical and biological performance of 3D printed polycaprolactone-bioactive glass composite scaffolds. Biomater. Adv. 134, 112540 (2022)10.1016/j.msec.2021.112540 ↗
2. L.L. Hench, Genetic design of bioactive glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 1257–1265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.00210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.002 ↗
3. A. Hoppe, R. Meszaros, C. Stähli, S. Romeis, J. Schmidt, W. Peukert, B. Marelli, S.N. Nazhat et al., In vitro reactivity of Cu doped 45S5 Bioglass® derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 5659–5674 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21007c10.1039/c3tb21007c ↗
4. F. Baino, E. Fiume, M. Miola, F. Leone, B. Onida, E. Verné, Fe-doped bioactive glass-derived scaffolds produced by sol-gel foaming. Mater. Lett. 235, 207–211 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.04210.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.042 ↗
5. R. Guo, X. Hou, D. Zhao, H. Wang, C. Shi, Y. Zhou, Mechanical stability and biological activity of Mg–Sr co-doped bioactive glass/chitosan composite scaffolds. J. Non Cryst. Solids 583, 121481 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12148110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121481 ↗
6. M.I. Santos, R.L. Reis, Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. Macromol. Biosci. 10, 12–27 (2010)10.1002/mabi.200900107 ↗
7. F. Baino, S. Fiorilli, C. Vitale-Brovarone, Bioactive glass-based materials with hierarchical porosity for medical applications: review of recent advances. Acta Biomater. 42, 18–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.03310.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033 ↗
8. S. Kargozar, P.B. Milan, M. Amoupour, F. Kermani, S. Gorgani, S. Nazarnezhad, S. Hooshmand, F. Baino, Osteogenic potential of magnesium (Mg)-doped multicomponent bioactive glass: in vitro and in vivo animal studies. Materials (Basel) 15, 318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1501031810.3390/ma15010318 ↗
9. S. Kargozar, M. Mozafari, S. Ghodrat, E. Fiume, F. Baino, Copper-containing bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics: From tissue regeneration to cancer therapeutic strategies. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 121, 111741 (2021)10.1016/j.msec.2020.111741 ↗
10. S.K. Arepalli, H. Tripathi, S.K. Hira, P.P. Manna, R. Pyare, S.P. Singh, Enhanced bioactivity, biocompatibility and mechanical behavior of strontium substituted bioactive glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 69, 108–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.07010.1016/j.msec.2016.06.070 ↗
11. M. Haji Mahdi Tajer, A. Moghanian, M. Zohourfazeli, Z. Miri, S.H. Hosseini, L. Dehghan Mehrjardi, R. Aghabarari, H. Zamani, An investigation on structural and in vitro biological properties of silicate-based bioactive glass powder in SiO2–CaO–P2O5–ZrO2–Li2O quintuplet system. Mater. Chem. Phys. 285, 126010 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12601010.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126010 ↗
12. S. Chen, M. Michálek, D. Galusková, M. Michálková, P. Švančárek, A. Talimian, H. Kaňková, J. Kraxner et al., Multi-targeted B and Co co-doped 45S5 bioactive glasses with angiogenic potential for bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 112, 110909 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11090910.1016/j.msec.2020.110909 ↗
13. M. Zohourfazeli, M.H. Mahdi Tajer, A. Moghanian, Comprehensive investigation on multifunctional properties of zirconium and silver co-substituted 58S bioactive glass. Ceram. Int. 47, 2499–2507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.09310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.093 ↗
14. H. Manoochehri, M. Ghorbani, M. Moosazadeh Moghaddam, M.R. Nourani, P. Makvandi, E. Sharifi, Strontium doped bioglass incorporated hydrogel-based scaffold for amplified bone tissue regeneration. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14329-010.1038/s41598-022-14329-0 ↗
15. C. Shi, X. Hou, D. Zhao, H. Wang, R. Guo, Y. Zhou, Preparation of the bioglass/chitosan-alginate composite scaffolds with high bioactivity and mechanical properties as bone graft materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 126, 105062 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10506210.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105062 ↗
16. K. Yangin, A.C. Özarslan, C.B. Çevlik, B.K. İkizler, S. Yücel, Production of strontium doped rice hull ash silica based bioactive glass– alginate composite scaffolds and in vitro simulated body fluid behaviour. New Mater. Compd. Appl. 2, 111–122 (2018)
17. M.N. Ozder, F. Ciftci, O. Berrak, E.D. Arisan, C.B. Ustündag, In situ synthesis and cell line studies of nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide composite materials for bone support applications. Ceram. Int. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.07510.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.075 ↗
18. A.C. Özarslan, S. Yücel, Fabrication and characterization of strontium incorporated 3-D bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue from biosilica. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 68, 350–357 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.00410.1016/j.msec.2016.06.004 ↗
19. M. Ensoylu, H. Atmaca, A.M. Deliormanlı, Fabrication and in vitro characterization of macroporous WS2/ bioactive glass scaffolds for biomedical applications. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 58, 397–409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-021-00696-w10.1007/s41779-021-00696-w ↗
20. J.P. Nayak, S. Kumar, J. Bera, Sol-gel synthesis of bioglass-ceramics using rice husk ash as a source for silica and its characterization. J. Non Cryst. Solids 356, 1447–1451 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.041 ↗
21. J.P. Nayak, J. Bera, Effect of sintering temperature on mechanical behaviour and bioactivity of sol-gel synthesized bioglass-ceramics using rice husk ash as a silica source. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 458–462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.011 ↗
22. W. Leenakul, T. Tunkasiri, N. Tongsiri, K. Pengpat, J. Ruangsuriya, Effect of sintering temperature variations on fabrication of 45S5 bioactive glass-ceramics using rice husk as a source for silica. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 61, 695–704 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.02910.1016/j.msec.2015.12.029 ↗
23. Y. Basaran Elalmis, S. Yucel, I. Aydin, Amorphous biogenic silica production and utilization in experimental dental composites: Effect of silica gel formation pH on silica and composite properties. Polym. Compos. 42, 5111–5124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2620910.1002/pc.26209 ↗
24. B. Karakuzu-Ikizler, P. Terzioğlu, Y. Basaran-Elalmis, B.S. Tekerek, S. Yücel, Role of magnesium and aluminum substitution on the structural properties and bioactivity of bioglasses synthesized from biogenic silica. Bioact. Mater. 5, 66–73 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.007 ↗
25. A.C. Özarslan, S. Yücel, Evaluation of novel composition (SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5, SrO–CuO) degradable amorphous silicate glasses properties and comprehensive characterization of the thermal features. Ceram. Int. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.22810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.228 ↗
26. A.C. Özarslan, S. Yücel, Comprehensive assessment of SrO and CuO co-incorporated 50S6P amorphous silicate bioactive glasses in vitro: Revealing bioactivity properties of bone graft biomaterial for bone tissue engineering applications. Ceram. Int. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.27610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.276 ↗
27. R. Zhao, L. Shi, L. Gu, X. Qin, Z. Song, X. Fan, P. Zhao, C. Li et al., Evaluation of bioactive glass scaffolds incorporating SrO or ZnO for bone repair: In vitro bioactivity and antibacterial activity. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800021104091010.1177/22808000211040910 ↗
28. D. Zamani, F. Moztarzadeh, D. Bizari, Alginate-bioactive glass containing Zn and Mg composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 137, 1256–1267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.18210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.182 ↗
29. C.B. Cevlik, A.C. Ozarslan, B. Karakuzu Ikizler, Y.B. Elalmis, S. Yucel, Mg, K, Cu, Zn doped S53P4 bioactive glass in vitro studies;bioactivity and biodegradability features. Indian Chem. Soc. 96, 1131–1136 (2019)
30. I. Elgayar, R. Hill, X. Chen, N. Bubb, D. Wood, Dielectric spectroscopy and dissolution studies of bioactive glasses. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 8, 418–427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.1232410.1111/ijag.12324 ↗
31. S.M. Rabiee, N. Nazparvar, M. Azizian, D. Vashaee, L. Tayebi, Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: a review. Ceram. Int. 41, 7241–7251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.140 ↗
32. J. Hatton, G.R. Davis, A.H.I. Mourad, N. Cherupurakal, R.G. Hill, S. Mohsin, Fabrication of porous bone scaffolds using alginate and bioactive glass. J. Funct. Biomater. 10, 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1001001510.3390/jfb10010015 ↗
33. R. Wetzel, M. Blochberger, F. Scheffler, L. Hupa, D.S. Brauer, Mg or Zn for Ca substitution improves the sintering of bioglass 45S5. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72091-710.1038/s41598-020-72091-7 ↗
34. S.J. Watts, R.G. Hill, M.D. O’Donnell, R.V. Law, Influence of magnesia on the structure and properties of bioactive glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 356, 517–524 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.04.07410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.04.074 ↗
35. Y.C. Fredholm, N. Karpukhina, R.V. Law, R.G. Hill, Strontium containing bioactive glasses: Glass structure and physical properties. J. Non Cryst. Solids 356, 2546–2551 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.06.07810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.06.078 ↗
36. O. Bretcanu, C. Samaille, A.R. Boccaccini, Simple methods to fabricate Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramic scaffolds exhibiting porosity gradient. J. Mater. Sci. 43, 4127–4134 (2008)10.1007/s10853-008-2536-y ↗
37. T.D. Roy, J.L. Simon, J.L. Ricci, E.D. Rekow, V.P. Thompson, J.R. Parsons, Performance of degradable composite bone repair products made via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 66, 283–291 (2003)10.1002/jbm.a.10582 ↗
38. Q. Fu, M.N. Rahaman, B.S. Bal, R.F. Brown, D.E. Day, Mechanical and in vitro performance of 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds prepared by a polymer foam replication technique. Acta Biomater. 4, 1854–1864 (2008)10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.019 ↗
39. Y. Lai, Y. Li, H. Cao, J. Long, X. Wang, L. Li, C. Li, Q. Jia et al., Osteogenic magnesium incorporated into PLGA/TCP porous scaffold by 3D printing for repairing challenging bone defect. Biomaterials 197, 207–219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013 ↗
40. F. Baino, E. Verné, C. Vitale-Brovarone, Feasibility, tailoring and properties of polyurethane/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 20, 2189–2195 (2009)10.1007/s10856-009-3787-0 ↗
41. A. Ali, M. Ershad, V.K. Vyas, S.K. Hira, P.P. Manna, B.N. Singh, S. Yadav, P. Srivastava et al., Studies on effect of CuO addition on mechanical properties and in vitro cytocompatibility in 1393 bioactive glass scaffold. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 93, 341–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.00310.1016/j.msec.2018.08.003 ↗
42. J. Bejarano, A.R. Boccaccini, C. Covarrubias, H. Palza, Effect of Cu-and Zn-doped bioactive glasses on the in vitro bioactivity, mechanical and degradation behavior of biodegradable PDLLA scaffolds. Materials (Basel) 13, 2908 (2020)10.3390/ma13132908 ↗
43. A. Haider, A. Waseem, N. Karpukhina, S. Mohsin, Strontium-and zinc-containing bioactive glass and alginates scaffolds. Bioengineering 7, 10 (2020)10.3390/bioengineering7010010 ↗
44. X. Wang, X. Li, A. Ito, Y. Sogo, Synthesis and characterization of hierarchically macroporous and mesoporous CaO–MO–SiO2–P2O5 (M=Mg, Zn, Sr) bioactive glass scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 7, 3638–3644 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.02910.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.029 ↗
45. S. Shahrabi, S. Hesaraki, S. Moemeni, M. Khorami, Structural discrepancies and in vitro nanoapatite formation ability of sol–gel derived glasses doped with different bone stimulator ions. Ceram. Int. 37, 2737–2746 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.04.02510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.04.025 ↗
46. J. Hum, A.R. Boccaccini, Collagen as coating material for 45S5 bioactive glass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1807 (2018)10.3390/ijms19061807 ↗
47. I. Cacciotti, Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: the influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties. J. Mater. Sci. 52, 8812–8831 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1010-010.1007/s10853-017-1010-0 ↗
48. S. Yücel, P. Terzioğlu, Z.A. Sinirlioğlu, B.S. Tekerek, Y.B. Elalmiş, Synthesis, characterization, in vitro degradability and bioactivity of strontium substituted rice hull ash silica based melt derived 45S5 bioactive glass. Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 33, 23–32 (2015)
49. S. Yücel, Z. Aydın Sinirlioğlu, B. Karakuzu, T.M. Temel, Y. Elalmış, A.C. Özarslan, Production, characterization and bioactivity of 46S6 Bioactive Glass From Rice Hull Ash Silica. Adv. Mater. Res. Trans. Tech. Publ. 1120–1121, 857–861 (2015)
50. A. Anand, S. Sengupta, H. Kaňková, A. Švančárková, A.M. Beltrán, D. Galusek, A.R. Boccaccini, D. Galusková, Influence of copper-strontium Co-doping on bioactivity, cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of mesoporous bioactive glass. Gels 8, 743 (2022)10.3390/gels8110743 ↗
51. J. Massera, L. Hupa, Influence of SrO substitution for CaO on the properties of bioactive glass S53P4. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 25, 657–668 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-5120-110.1007/s10856-013-5120-1 ↗
52. A.L.B. Maçon, T.B. Kim, E.M. Valliant, K. Goetschius, R.K. Brow, D.E. Day, A. Hoppe, A.R. Boccaccini et al., A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 26, 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5403-910.1007/s10856-015-5403-9 ↗
53. D. Desimone, W. Li, J.A. Roether, D.W. Schubert, M.C. Crovace, A.C.M. Rodrigues, E.D. Zanotto, A.R. Boccaccini, Biosilicate®-gelatine bone scaffolds by the foam replica technique: Development and characterization. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/14/4/04500810.1088/1468-6996/14/4/045008 ↗
54. L.L. Hench, The story of Bioglass®. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17, 967–978 (2006)10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
55. L.L. Hench, Bioglass: 10 milestones from concept to commerce. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 432, 2–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.03810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.038 ↗
56. L.M. Grover, A.J. Wright, U. Gbureck, A. Bolarinwa, J. Song, Y. Liu, D.F. Farrar, G. Howling et al., The effect of amorphous pyrophosphate on calcium phosphate cement resorption and bone generation. Biomaterials 34, 6631–6637 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.001 ↗
57. E. Dietrich, H. Oudadesse, A. Lucas-Girot, M. Mami, In vitro bioactivity of melt-derived glass 46S6 doped with magnesium. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 88, 1087–1096 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3190110.1002/jbm.a.31901 ↗
58. A. Al-Noaman, S.C.F. Rawlinson, R.G. Hill, The role of MgO on thermal properties, structure and bioactivity of bioactive glass coating for dental implants. J. Non Cryst. Solids 358, 3019–3027 (2012)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.07.039 ↗
59. G. Lusvardi, D. Zaffe, L. Menabue, C. Bertoldi, G. Malavasi, U. Consolo, In vitro and in vivo behaviour of zinc-doped phosphosilicate glasses. Acta Biomater. 5, 419–428 (2009)10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.007 ↗
60. C.P.O. Sio, A. Balamurugan, G. Balossier, S. Kannan, J. Michel, A.H.S. Rebelo, J.M.F. Ferreira, Development and in vitro characterization of sol–gel derived. In Vitro 3, 255–262 (2007)
61. V. Aina, G. Malavasi, A. Fiorio Pla, L. Munaron, C. Morterra, Zinc-containing bioactive glasses: surface reactivity and behaviour towards endothelial cells. Acta Biomater. 5, 1211–1222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.02010.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.020 ↗
62. R.L. Du, J. Chang, S.Y. Ni, W.Y. Zhai, J.Y. Wang, Characterization and in vitro bioactivity of zinc-containing bioactive glass and glass-ceramics. J. Biomater. Appl. 20, 341–360 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/088532820605453510.1177/0885328206054535 ↗
63. J. Bejarano, P. Caviedes, H. Palza, Sol-gel synthesis and in vitro bioactivity of copper and zinc-doped silicate bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomed. Mater. 10, 25001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/2/02500110.1088/1748-6041/10/2/025001 ↗
64. E. Wers, L. Bunetel, H. Oudadesse, B. Lefeuvre, A. Lucas-Girot, A. Mostafa, P. Pellen, Effect of copper and zinc on the bioactivity and cells viability of bioactive glasses. Bioceram. Dev. Appl. S 1, 2 (2013)
65. Z. Wu, Q. Li, Y. Pan, Y. Yao, S. Tang, J. Su, J.-W. Shin, J. Wei et al., Nanoporosity improved water absorption, in vitro degradability, mineralization, osteoblast responses and drug release of poly (butylene succinate)-based composite scaffolds containing nanoporous magnesium silicate compared with magnesium silicate. Int. J. Nanomed. 12, 3637 (2017)10.2147/IJN.S132778 ↗
66. G.H. Yang, M. Yeo, E. Choi, D. Kang, M. Kim, Y. Nam, S.-J. Gwak, H.H. Yoo et al., Investigating the physical characteristics and cellular interplay on 3D-printed scaffolds depending on the incorporated silica size for hard tissue regeneration. Mater. Des. 207, 109866 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10986610.1016/j.matdes.2021.109866 ↗
67. ISO P (2009) 10993–5: 2009 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Int Organ Stand Geneva
68. A.C. Özarslan, Y.B. Elalmis, S. Yücel, Production of biosilica based bioactive glass-alginate composite putty as bone support material, and evaluation of in vitro properties; bioactivity and cytotoxicity behavior. J. Non Cryst. Solids 561, 120755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.12075510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120755 ↗
69. I.D. Xynos, A.J. Edgar, L.D.K. Buttery, L.L. Hench, J.M. Polak, Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass® 45S5 dissolution. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. An Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Japan. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater. 55, 151–157 (2001)
70. I.D. Xynos, M.V.J. Hukkanen, J.J. Batten, L.D. Buttery, L.L. Hench, J.M. Polak, Bioglass ®45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation in vitro: Implications and applications for bone tissue engineering. Calcif. Tissue Int. 67, 321–329 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223000113410.1007/s002230001134 ↗
71. A. Hoppe, V. Mouriño, A.R. Boccaccini, Therapeutic inorganic ions in bioactive glasses to enhance bone formation and beyond. Biomater. Sci. 1, 254–256 (2013)10.1039/C2BM00116K ↗
72. V. Mourino, J.P. Cattalini, A.R. Boccaccini, Metallic ions as therapeutic agents in tissue engineering scaffolds: an overview of their biological applications and strategies for new developments. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 401–419 (2012)10.1098/rsif.2011.0611 ↗
73. A. Balamurugan, G. Balossier, J. Michel, S. Kannan, H. Benhayoune, A.H.S. Rebelo, J.M.F. Ferreira, Sol gel derived SiO2-CaO-MgO-P2O5 bioglass system—Preparation and in vitro characterization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 83, 546–553 (2007)10.1002/jbm.b.30827 ↗
74. V.G. Varanasi, E. Saiz, P.M. Loomer, B. Ancheta, N. Uritani, S.P. Ho, A.P. Tomsia, S.J. Marshall et al., Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2–CaO–P2O5–MgO–K2O–Na2O system) ions. Acta Biomater. 5, 3536–3547 (2009)10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.035 ↗
75. X. Chen, X. Liao, Z. Huang, P. You, C. Chen, Y. Kang, G. Yin, Synthesis and characterization of novel multiphase bioactive glass-ceramics in the CaO-MgO-SiO2 system. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 93, 194–202 (2010)10.1002/jbm.b.31574 ↗
76. A. Saboori, M. Rabiee, F. Moztarzadeh, M. Sheikhi, M. Tahriri, M. Karimi, Synthesis, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of sol-gel-derived SiO2–CaO–P2O5–MgO bioglass. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29, 335–340 (2009)10.1016/j.msec.2008.07.004 ↗
77. A. Wajda, W.H. Goldmann, R. Detsch, A.R. Boccaccini, M. Sitarz, Influence of zinc ions on structure, bioactivity, biocompatibility and antibacterial potential of melt-derived and gel-derived glasses from CaO-SiO2 system. J. Non Cryst. Solids 511, 86–99 (2019)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.12.040 ↗
78. S. Kapoor, A. Goel, A.F. Correia, M.J. Pascual, H.-Y. Lee, H.-W. Kim, J.M.F. Ferreira, Influence of ZnO/MgO substitution on sintering, crystallisation, and bio-activity of alkali-free glass-ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 53, 252–261 (2015)10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.023 ↗
79. F. Ciftci, Release kinetics modelling and in vivo-vitro, shelf-life study of resveratrol added composite transdermal scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 235, 123769 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12376910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123769 ↗
80. T. de Terris, O. Andreau, P. Peyre, F. Adamski, I. Koutiri, C. Gorny, C. Dupuy, Optimization and comparison of porosity rate measurement methods of selective laser melted metallic parts. Addit. Manuf. 28, 802–813 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.03510.1016/j.addma.2019.05.035 ↗
81. A.C. Özarslan, C. Özel, M.D. Okumuş, D. Doğan, S. Yücel, Development, structural and rheological characterization, and in vitro evaluation of the zinc-doped 45S5 bioactive glass-vaseline ointment for potential wound healing applications. J. Mater. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-023-00908-y10.1557/s43578-023-00908-y ↗
82. ISO (2012) ISO 10993-12/2012_Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials. Int. Organ. Stand. Geneva
83. X. Zhang, D. Zeng, N. Li, J. Wen, X. Jiang, C. Liu, Y. Li, Functionalized mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for enhanced bone tissue regeneration. Sci. Rep. 6, 19361 (2016)10.1038/srep19361 ↗