Development, structural and rheological characterization, and in vitro evaluation of the zinc-doped 45S5 bioactive glass-vaseline ointment for potential wound healing applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioactive glass (BG) has recently been proposed to be used for wound healing with Vaseline®. To accelerate the wound healing by incorporation of the Zinc (Zn) into BG, undoped and 5 wt% zinc-doped 45S5 BG (16 wt%) were prepared with Vaseline® to create the ointments for wound healing as a VBG and VBG-Zn, respectively. The results showed that desired composition, irregular form, and no porous surface have obtained for BGs. FT-IR spectrum of Zn-doped BG demonstrates increasing Network Connectivity due to Zn incorporation. Ointments exhibited pseudoplastic behaviour and viscoelastic characteristic, indicating that ointments have good topical application. Ointments did not toxic effect towards L929 cells in terms of biocompatibility for topical applications. In vitro wound healing assays revealed that VBG-Zn promotes wound healing thanks to incorporation of the Zn accelerates skin wound closure. All findings point to VBG-Zn ointment having a greater potential for wound healing applications. for open acesss; https://rdcu.be/c6T3W
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Wound Healing and Treatments · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. J.K. Young, K.M. Baldwin, Elsevier’s integrated histology (Mosby, Maryland Heights, 2007)
2. P.A.J. Kolarsick, M.A. Kolarsick, C. Goodwin, Anatomy and physiology of the skin. J. Dermatol. Nurses Assoc. 3(4), 203–213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1097/JDN.0B013E3182274A9810.1097/JDN.0B013E3182274A98 ↗
3. C.M. Chuong, B.J. Nickoloff, P.M. Elias, L.A. Goldsmith, E. Macher, P.A. Maderson, J.P. Sundberg, H. Tagami, P.M. Plonka, K. Thestrup-Pedersen et al., What is the ‘true’ function of skin? Exp. Dermatol. 11(2), 159–160 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0625.2002.00112.X10.1034/J.1600-0625.2002.00112.X ↗
4. M. Takeo, W. Lee, M. Ito, Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5(1), a023267 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A02326710.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A023267 ↗
5. S. Guo, L.A. DiPietro, Factors affecting wound healing. J. Dent. Res. 89(3), 219 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/002203450935912510.1177/0022034509359125 ↗
6. H. Sorg, D.J. Tilkorn, S. Hager, J. Hauser, U. Mirastschijski, Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts. Eur. Surg. Res. 58(1–2), 81–94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1159/00045491910.1159/000454919 ↗
7. R.A.F. Clark, K. Ghosh, M.G. Tonnesen, Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. J. Investig. Dermatol. 127(5), 1018–1029 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.JID.570071510.1038/SJ.JID.5700715 ↗
8. C. Theoret, J. Schumacher, Physiology of wound healing, in Equine Wound Management, 3rd edn., ed. by C. Theoret, J. Schumacher (Wiley, Hoboken, 2016), pp.1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118999219.CH110.1002/9781118999219.CH1 ↗
9. S.M. Mârza, K. Magyari, S. Bogdan, M. Moldovan, C. Peştean, A. Nagy, F. Tǎbǎran, E. Licarete, S. Suarasan, A. Dreanca et al., Skin wound regeneration with bioactive glass-gold nanoparticles ointment. Biomed. Mater. 14(2), 025011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/AAFD7D10.1088/1748-605X/AAFD7D ↗
10. W.J. Ennis, D. Hill, Wound healing: a comprehensive wound assessment and treatment approach. Skin Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801654-1.00012-710.1016/B978-0-12-801654-1.00012-7 ↗
11. N.X. Landén, D. Li, M. Ståhle, Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73(20), 3861 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00018-016-2268-010.1007/S00018-016-2268-0 ↗
12. S. Kadam, K.S. Kaushik, From ouch to ah-ha! understanding wounds, healing, and infections. Front. Young Minds (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/FRYM.2019.0015710.3389/FRYM.2019.00157 ↗
13. P. Kesharwani, A. Bisht, A. Alexander, V. Dave, S. Sharma, Biomedical applications of hydrogels in drug delivery system: an update. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 66, 102914 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2021.10291410.1016/J.JDDST.2021.102914 ↗
14. L. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Li, L. Qiu, S. Zhou, P. Cui, P. Jiang, X. Ni, R. Liu, X. Du et al., Manganese dioxide nanozyme for reactive oxygen therapy of bacterial infection and wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 9(17), 5965–5976 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1BM00683E10.1039/D1BM00683E ↗
15. X. Fang, Y. Liu, M. Zhang, S. Zhou, P. Cui, H. Hu, P. Jiang, C. Wang, L. Qiu, J. Wang, Glucose oxidase loaded thermosensitive hydrogel as an antibacterial wound dressing. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 76, 103791 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2022.10379110.1016/J.JDDST.2022.103791 ↗
16. A.O. Ijaola, D.O. Akamo, F. Damiri, C.J. Akisin, E.A. Bamidele, E.G. Ajiboye, M. Berrada, V.O. Onyenokwe, S.Y. Yang, E. Asmatulu, Polymeric biomaterials for wound healing applications: a comprehensive review. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 33(15), 1998–2050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2022.208852810.1080/09205063.2022.2088528 ↗
17. J.H. Kim, H. Kim, Y. Choi, D.S. Lee, J. Kim, G.R. Yi, Colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles as strong adhesives for hydrogels and biological tissues. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(37), 31469–31477 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.7B09083/SUPPL_FILE/AM7B09083_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSAMI.7B09083/SUPPL_FILE/AM7B09083_SI_001.PDF ↗
18. S. Rose, A. Prevoteau, P. Elzière, D. Hourdet, A. Marcellan, L. Leibler, Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues. Nature 505(7483), 382–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1280610.1038/nature12806 ↗
19. A. Morales-Burgos, M.P. Loosemore, L.H. Goldberg, Postoperative wound care after dermatologic procedures: a comparison of 2 commonly used petrolatum-based ointments. J. Drugs Dermatol. 12(2), 163–164 (2013)
20. Q.Q. Fang, X.F. Wang, W.Y. Zhao, B.H. Shi, D. Lou, C.Y. Chen, M.X. Zhang, X. Wang, L. Ma, W.Q. Tan, Development of a chitosan-vaseline gauze dressing with wound-healing properties in murine models. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 102(2), 468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4269/AJTMH.19-038710.4269/AJTMH.19-0387 ↗
21. S.R. Kuppam, The skinny on moisturizers: a brief report. Dermatol. Open J. 5(1), 1–5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17140/DRMTOJ-5-13810.17140/DRMTOJ-5-138 ↗
22. A. Boudjelal, E. Napoli, A. Benkhaled, L. Benazi, R. Bey, D. Gentile, G. Ruberto, In vivo wound healing effect of Italian and Algerian Pistacia vera L. resins. Fitoterapia 159, 105197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FITOTE.2022.10519710.1016/J.FITOTE.2022.105197 ↗
23. American Academy of Dermatology Association, in Proper wound care: How to minimize a scar. https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/injured-skin/burns/wound-care-minimize-scars. Accessed 17 Oct 2022.
24. C.S. Pak, D.H. Park, T.S. Oh, W.J. Lee, Y.J. Jun, K.A. Lee, K.S. Oh, K.H. Kwak, J.W. Rhie, Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing. Int. Wound J. 16(2), 379–386 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/IWJ.1304310.1111/IWJ.13043 ↗
25. X.F. Wang, M.L. Li, Q.Q. Fang, W.Y. Zhao, D. Lou, Y.Y. Hu, J. Chen, X.Z. Wang, W.Q. Tan, Flexible electrical stimulation device with Chitosan-Vaseline® dressing accelerates wound healing in diabetes. Bioact. Mater. 6(1), 230–243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2020.08.00310.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2020.08.003 ↗
26. S.H. Huang, C.H. Lin, K.P. Chang, S.H. Wu, S.D. Lin, C.S. Lai, S.F. Ou, S.S. Lee, Clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy of Aquacel Ag with Vaseline gauze versus 1% silver sulfadiazine cream in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Adv. Skin Wound Care 27(5), 210–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000445919.06416.3210.1097/01.ASW.0000445919.06416.32 ↗
27. S.H. Huang, P.S. Yang, S.H. Wu, K.P. Chang, T.M. Lin, S.D. Lin, C.S. Lai, S.S. Lee, Aquacel® Ag with Vaseline gauze in the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Burns 36(1), 121–126 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BURNS.2009.02.01810.1016/J.BURNS.2009.02.018 ↗
28. L.L. Hench, The story of bioglass. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17(11), 967–978 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-006-0432-Z10.1007/S10856-006-0432-Z ↗
29. C. Lin, C. Mao, J. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Chen, Healing effect of bioactive glass ointment on full-thickness skin wounds. Biomed. Mater. 7(4), 045017 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/04501710.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045017 ↗
30. E. Güney, C. Emir, D. Altan, S. Yücel, Development of biocomposite tissue scaffolds of collagen/gelatin/boron-doped bioactive glass prepared through solvent casting/particulate leaching method for bone tissue engineering. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 97(10(c)), 2006 (2020)
31. B. Karakuzu-İkizler, P. Terzioğlu, B.S. Oduncu-Tekerek, S. Yücel, Effect of selenium incorporation on the structure and in vitro bioactivity of 45S5 bioglass. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 56(2), 697–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/S41779-019-00388-6/FIGURES/810.1007/S41779-019-00388-6/FIGURES/8 ↗
32. Y. Basaran Elalmis, B. Karakuzu Ikizler, S. Kilic Depren, S. Yucel, I. Aydin, Investigation of alumina doped 45S5 glass as a bioactive filler for experimental dental composites. Int. J. Appl. Glass. Sci. 12(3), 313–327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAG.1604310.1111/IJAG.16043 ↗
33. T. Mehrabi, A.S. Mesgar, Z. Mohammadi, Bioactive glasses: a promising therapeutic ion release strategy for enhancing wound healing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6(10), 5399–5430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.0C00528/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AB0C00528_0008.JPEG10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.0C00528/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AB0C00528_0008.JPEG ↗
34. L.L. Hench, J.M. Polak, Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295(5557), 2002 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.106740410.1126/SCIENCE.1067404 ↗
35. L.L. Hench, L.L. Hench, Chronology of bioactive glass development and clinical applications. New J. Glass Ceram. 3(2), 67–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4236/NJGC.2013.3201110.4236/NJGC.2013.32011 ↗
36. J. Wilson, G.H. Pigott, F.J. Schoen, L.L. Hench, Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15(6), 805–817 (1981)10.1002/jbm.820150605 ↗
37. R.L. Gillette, S.F. Swaim, E.A. Sartin, D.M. Bradley, S.L. Coolman, Effects of a bioactive glass on healing of closed skin wounds in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62(7), 1149–1153 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2460/AJVR.2001.62.114910.2460/AJVR.2001.62.1149 ↗
38. A.M.A. Coco, T. Martins, B.R. Barrioni, M.M. de Pereira, Effect of incorporating silver on the structure and ion release profile of binary SiO2–Ag2O mesoporous bioactive glass submicron spherical particles. Ceram. Int. 47(18), 26100–26108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2021.06.01610.1016/J.CERAMINT.2021.06.016 ↗
39. S. Kargozar, S. Hamzehlou, F. Baino, Can bioactive glasses be useful to accelerate the healing of epithelial tissues? Mater. Sci. Eng. C 97, 1009–1020 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.01.02810.1016/J.MSEC.2019.01.028 ↗
40. G. Kaur, Bioactive Glasses in Angiogenesis and Wound Healing : Soft Tissue Repair (Springer, Cham, 2017), pp.237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45716-1_910.1007/978-3-319-45716-1_9 ↗
41. E. Mazzoni, M.R. Iaquinta, C. Lanzillotti, C. Mazziotta, M. Maritati, M. Montesi, S. Sprio, A. Tampieri, M. Tognon, F. Martini, Bioactive materials for soft tissue repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2021.613787/BIBTEX10.3389/FBIOE.2021.613787/BIBTEX ↗
42. H. Li, J. He, H. Yu, C.R. Green, J. Chang, Bioglass promotes wound healing by affecting gap junction connexin 43 mediated endothelial cell behavior. Biomaterials 84, 64–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2016.01.03310.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2016.01.033 ↗
43. W. Xie, X. Chen, G. Miao, J. Tang, X. Fu, Regulation of cellular behaviors of fibroblasts related to wound healing by sol–gel derived bioactive glass particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 104(10), 2420–2429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.A.3578210.1002/JBM.A.35782 ↗
44. A.A. Gorustovich, J.A. Roether, A.R. Boccaccini, Effect of bioactive glasses on angiogenesis: a review of in vitro and in vivo evidences. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 16(2), 199–207 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.041610.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0416 ↗
45. M. Jridi, S. Bardaa, D. Moalla, T. Rebaii, N. Souissi, Z. Sahnoun, M. Nasri, Microstructure, rheological and wound healing properties of collagen-based gel from cuttlefish skin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 77, 369–374 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2015.03.02010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2015.03.020 ↗
46. J. Zhu, G. Jiang, G. Song, T. Liu, C. Cao, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, W. Hong, Incorporation of ZnO/bioactive glass nanoparticles into alginate/chitosan composite hydrogels for wound closure. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2(11), 5042–5052 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSABM.9B00727/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MT9B00727_0009.JPEG10.1021/ACSABM.9B00727/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MT9B00727_0009.JPEG ↗
47. M. Sohrabi, B.E. Yekta, H.R. Rezaie, M.R. Naimi-Jamal, C. Bijan, The influence of 3-glycidyloxypropyl trimethoxysilane on the rheological and in-vitro behavior of injectable composites containing 64S bioactive glass, chitosan, and gelatin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 138, 50963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.5096310.1002/APP.50963 ↗
48. W. Xie, X. Fu, F. Tang, Y. Mo, J. Cheng, H. Wang, X. Chen, Dose-dependent modulation effects of bioactive glass particles on macrophages and diabetic wound healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 7(6), 940–952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB02938E10.1039/C8TB02938E ↗
49. J. Shen, W. Gu, X. Yang, Y. Li, Z. Gou, Z. Jin, Systematic investigation of a new nanoscale bioactive glass on wound healing in vivo in comparison with the clinically applied 45S5 Bioglass. Int. J. Regener. Med. 2018(1), 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31487/J.RGM.2018.10.00110.31487/J.RGM.2018.10.001 ↗
50. S. Pourshahrestani, E. Zeimaran, N.A. Kadri, N. Gargiulo, S. Samuel, S.V. Naveen, T. Kamarul, M.R. Towler, Gallium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass with potent hemostatic activity and antibacterial efficacy. J. Mater. Chem. B 4(1), 71–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02062J10.1039/C5TB02062J ↗
51. J. Li, D. Zhai, F. Lv, Q. Yu, H. Ma, J. Yin, Z. Yi, M. Liu, J. Chang, C. Wu, Preparation of copper-containing bioactive glass/eggshell membrane nanocomposites for improving angiogenesis, antibacterial activity and wound healing. Acta Biomater. 36, 254–266 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2016.03.01110.1016/J.ACTBIO.2016.03.011 ↗
52. C. Mao, C. Lin, X. Chen, Enhanced healing of full-thickness diabetic wounds using bioactive glass and Yunnan baiyao ointments. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater. Sci. Ed. 29(5), 1063–1070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11595-014-1044-Y10.1007/S11595-014-1044-Y ↗
53. S. Naseri, W.C. Lepry, S.N. Nazhat, Bioactive glasses in wound healing: hope or hype? J. Mater. Chem. B 5(31), 6167–6174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TB01221G10.1039/C7TB01221G ↗
54. L. Hupa, K.H. Karlsson, Tailoring of bioactive glasses, in Bioactive Glasses: Fundamentals, Technology and Applications, vol. 2017, ed. by A.R. Boccaccini, D.S. Brauer (Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2016), pp.136–16010.1039/9781782622017-00136 ↗
55. S. Majumdar, S. Gupta, S. Krishnamurthy, Multifarious applications of bioactive glasses in soft tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 9(24), 8111–8147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1BM01104A10.1039/D1BM01104A ↗
56. I. Cacciotti, Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: the influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties. J. Mater. Sci. 52(15), 8812–8831 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-017-1010-010.1007/S10853-017-1010-0 ↗
57. K.H. Brown, S.E. Wuehler, J.M. Peerson, The importance of zinc in human nutrition and estimation of the global prevalence of zinc deficiency. Food Nutr. Bull. 22(2), 113–125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265010220020110.1177/156482650102200201 ↗
58. M.J. Jackson, Physiology of zinc: general aspects, in Zinc in Human Body. ed. by C.F. Mills (Springer, London, 1989), pp.1–14
59. Z. Neščáková, K. Zheng, L. Liverani, Q. Nawaz, D. Galusková, H. Kaňková, M. Michálek, D. Galusek, A.R. Boccaccini, Multifunctional zinc ion doped sol–gel derived mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 4, 312–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2019.10.00210.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2019.10.002 ↗
60. Y.F. Goh, A.Z. Alshemary, M. Akram, M.R. Abdul Kadir, R. Hussain, In vitro study of nano-sized zinc doped bioactive glass. Mater. Chem. Phys. 137(3), 1031–1038 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2012.11.02210.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2012.11.022 ↗
61. R. Sergi, D. Bellucci, R. Salvatori, G. Maisetta, G. Batoni, V. Cannillo, Zinc containing bioactive glasses with ultra-high crystallization temperature, good biological performance and antibacterial effects. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 104, 109910 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.10991010.1016/J.MSEC.2019.109910 ↗
62. V. Aina, G. Malavasi, A. Fiorio Pla, L. Munaron, C. Morterra, Zinc-containing bioactive glasses: surface reactivity and behaviour towards endothelial cells. Acta Biomater. 5(4), 1211–1222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2008.10.02010.1016/J.ACTBIO.2008.10.020 ↗
63. G. Lusvardi, G. Malavasi, L. Menabue, M.C. Menziani, A. Pedone, U. Segre, V. Aina, A. Perardi, C. Morterra, F. Boccafoschi et al., Properties of zinc releasing surfaces for clinical applications. J. Biomater. Appl. 22(6), 505–526 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/088532820707973110.1177/0885328207079731 ↗
64. S. Solgi, M. Shahrezaee, A. Zamanian, T.S. Jafarzadeh Kashi, M. Raz, K. Khoshroo, M. Tahriri, Sol-gel synthesis and characterization of SiO2-CaO-P2O5-SrO bioactive glass: In Vitro Study. Key Eng. Mater. 631, 30–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/KEM.631.3010.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/KEM.631.30 ↗
65. Q. Nawaz, A. de Pablos-Martín, J.M. de Souza e Silva, L. Berthold, K. Hurle, A.T. Contreras Jaimes, M. Sitarz, D.S. Brauer, A.R. Boccaccini, Crystallization study of sol–gel derived 13–93 bioactive glass powder. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 41(2), 1695–1706 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2020.09.05210.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2020.09.052 ↗
66. A. Doostmohammadi, A. Monshi, R. Salehi, M.H. Fathi, Z. Golniya, A.U. Daniels, Bioactive glass nanoparticles with negative zeta potential. Ceram. Int. 37(7), 2311–2316 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.03.02610.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.03.026 ↗
67. D. Bellucci, V. Cannillo, A novel bioactive glass containing strontium and magnesium with ultra-high crystallization temperature. Mater. Lett. 213, 67–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2017.11.02010.1016/J.MATLET.2017.11.020 ↗
68. N. Zhao, W. Yuan, Functionally integrated bioglass microspheres-composited double-network hydrogel with good tissue adhesion and electrical conductivity for efficient wound treatment and health detection. Compos. B Eng. 242, 110095 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.11009510.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.110095 ↗
69. R. Chen, Q. Li, Q. Zhang, S. Xu, J. Han, P. Huang, Z. Yu, D. Jia, J. Liu, H. Jia et al., Nanosized HCA-coated borate bioactive glass with improved wound healing effects on rodent model. Chem. Eng. J. 426, 130299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.13029910.1016/J.CEJ.2021.130299 ↗
70. A.M. El-Kady, A.F. Ali, Fabrication and characterization of ZnO modified bioactive glass nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 38(2), 1195–1204 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.07.06910.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.07.069 ↗
71. S. Shruti, A.J. Salinas, G. Malavasi, G. Lusvardi, L. Menabue, C. Ferrara, P. Mustarelli, M. Vallet-Regì, Structural and in vitro study of cerium, gallium and zinc containing sol–gel bioactive glasses. J. Mater. Chem. 22(27), 13698–13706 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM31767B10.1039/C2JM31767B ↗
72. A. Haider, A. Waseem, N. Karpukhina, S. Mohsin, Strontium- and Zinc-containing bioactive glass and alginates scaffolds. Bioengineering 7(1), 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOENGINEERING701001010.3390/BIOENGINEERING7010010 ↗
73. A.C. Özarslan, S. Yücel, Evaluation of novel composition (SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5, SrO–CuO) degradable amorphous silicate glasses properties and comprehensive characterization of the thermal features. Ceram. Int. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2022.10.22810.1016/J.CERAMINT.2022.10.228 ↗
74. N.S. Hussain, M.A. Lopes, J.D. Santos, A comparative study of CaO–P2O5–SiO2 gels prepared by a sol–gel method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 88(1), 5–8 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2004.06.01510.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2004.06.015 ↗
75. M. Blochberger, L. Hupa, D.S. Brauer, Influence of zinc and magnesium substitution on ion release from Bioglass 45S5 at physiological and acidic pH. Biomed. Glasses 1(1), 93–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/BGLASS-2015-0009/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS10.1515/BGLASS-2015-0009/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS ↗
76. S.M. Rabiee, N. Nazparvar, M. Azizian, D. Vashaee, L. Tayebi, Effect of ion substitution on properties of bioactive glasses: a review. Ceram. Int. 41(6), 7241–7251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2015.02.14010.1016/J.CERAMINT.2015.02.140 ↗
77. A.J. Salinas, S. Shruti, G. Malavasi, L. Menabue, M. Vallet-Regí, Substitutions of cerium, gallium and zinc in ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 7(9), 3452–3458 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2011.05.03310.1016/J.ACTBIO.2011.05.033 ↗
78. S. Shahrabi, S. Hesaraki, S. Moemeni, M. Khorami, Structural discrepancies and in vitro nanoapatite formation ability of sol–gel derived glasses doped with different bone stimulator ions. Ceram. Int. 37(7), 2737–2746 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.04.02510.1016/J.CERAMINT.2011.04.025 ↗
79. C. B. Çevlik, Sodyum hiyalüronat ve stronsiyum-çinko katkılı biyoaktif cam içerikli doku iskelesi üretimi ve karakterizasyonu / Production and characterization of tissue scaffold contain sodium hyaluronate and strontium-zinc doped 45S5 bioactive glass. Yıldız Technical University, (2020).
80. T.A. Ostomel, Q. Shi, C.K. Tsung, H. Liang, G.D. Stucky, Spherical bioactive glass with enhanced rates of hydroxyapatite deposition and hemostatic activity. Small 2(11), 1261–1265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/SMLL.20060017710.1002/SMLL.200600177 ↗
81. U. Wollina, K. Hasenöhrl, E. Köstler, J. Schönlebe, B. Heinig, G. Haroske, T. Kittner, Dystrophic calcification in chronic leg ulcers—a clinicopathologic study. Dermatol. Surg. 35(3), 457–461 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1524-4725.2009.01064.X10.1111/J.1524-4725.2009.01064.X ↗
82. S. Tokoro, T. Satoh, Y. Okubo, K. Igawa, H. Yokozeki, Latent dystrophic subcutaneous calcification in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Acta Derm. Venereol. 89(5), 505–508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0680/10.2340/00015555-0680/ ↗
83. E. Norris, Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Wound Healing (Imperial College London, London, 2019)
84. P.C.M. Van De Kerkhof, J. Berth-Jones, C.E.M. Griffiths, P.V. Harrison, H. Hönigsmann, R. Marks, R. Roelandts, E. Schöpf, C. Trompke, Long-term efficacy and safety of tacalcitol ointment in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Br. J. Dermatol. 146(3), 414–422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2133.2002.04567.X10.1046/J.1365-2133.2002.04567.X ↗
85. E.K. Park, K.W. Song, Rheological evaluation of petroleum jelly as a base material in ointment and cream formulations: steady shear flow behavior. Arch. Pharm. Res. 33(1), 141–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/S12272-010-2236-410.1007/S12272-010-2236-4 ↗
86. P. M. Doran, Fluid flow, in Bioprocess Engineering Principles (2013), pp. 201–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-220851-5.00007-1.10.1016/B978-0-12-220851-5.00007-1 ↗
87. H.P. Rønningsen, Rheology of petroleum fluids. Annu. Trans. Nordic Rheol. Soc. 20, 11–18 (2012)
88. Y.S. Wu, Immiscible displacement of non-Newtonian fluids, in Multiphase Fluid Flow in Porous and Fractured Reservoirs. ed. by Y.S. Wu (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2016), pp.127–16610.1016/B978-0-12-803848-2.00007-6 ↗
89. J.P. Marty, C. Lafforgue, J.L. Grossiord, P. Soto, Rheological properties of three different vitamin D ointments and their clinical perception by patients with mild to moderate psoriasis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 19(3), 7–10 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-3083.2005.01330.X10.1111/J.1468-3083.2005.01330.X ↗
90. A.C. Özarslan, Y.B. Elalmis, S. Yücel, Production of biosilica based bioactive glass-alginate composite putty as bone support material, and evaluation of in vitro properties; bioactivity and cytotoxicity behavior. J. Non Cryst. Solids 561, 120755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2021.12075510.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2021.120755 ↗
91. B.E. Rapp, Fluids, in Microfluidics: Modelling, Mechanics and Mathematics. ed. by B. Rapp (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017), pp.243–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3141-1.50009-510.1016/B978-1-4557-3141-1.50009-5 ↗
92. R.P. Chhabra, Non-Newtonian fluids: an introduction. Rheol. Complex Fluids (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6494-6_1/FIGURES/2310.1007/978-1-4419-6494-6_1/FIGURES/23 ↗
93. F. Walha, K. Lamnawar, A. Maazouz, M. Jaziri, Rheological, morphological and mechanical studies of sustainably sourced polymer blends based on poly(lactic acid) and polyamide 11. Polymers 8(3), 61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM803006110.3390/POLYM8030061 ↗
94. R. Ganguly, S. Kumar, A. Kunwar, S. Nath, H.D. Sarma, A. Tripathi, G. Verma, D.P. Chaudhari, V.K. Aswal, J.S. Melo, Structural and therapeutic properties of curcumin solubilized pluronic F127 micellar solutions and hydrogels. J. Mol. Liq. 314, 113591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2020.11359110.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2020.113591 ↗
95. R. Ganguly, G. Verma, A. Ingle, S. Kumar, H.D. Sarma, D. Dutta, B. Dutta, A. Kunwar, K. Ajish, K.C. Bhainsa et al., Structural, rheological and therapeutic properties of pluronic F127 hydrogel and beeswax based lavender oil ointment formulations. J. Mol. Liq. 365, 120157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2022.12015710.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2022.120157 ↗
96. M.S. Kwak, H.J. Ahn, K.W. Song, Rheological investigation of body cream and body lotion in actual application conditions. Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 27(3), 241–251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13367-015-0024-X10.1007/S13367-015-0024-X ↗
97. S. Patere, B. Newman, Y. Wang, S. Choi, S. Vora, A.W.K. Ma, M. Jay, X. Lu, Influence of manufacturing process variables on the properties of ophthalmic ointments of tobramycin. Pharm. Res. 35(9), 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11095-018-2462-X/FIGURES/1010.1007/S11095-018-2462-X/FIGURES/10 ↗
98. P. Pandey, G.D. Ewing, Rheological characterization of petrolatum using a controlled stress rheometer. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 34(2), 157–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/0363904070148456910.1080/03639040701484569 ↗
99. A. Lauterbach, K. Ekelund, Rheological temperature sweeping in a quality by design approach for formulation development and optimization. Int. J. Pharm. 568, 118533 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2019.11853310.1016/J.IJPHARM.2019.118533 ↗
100. J. Nanda, A. Banerjee, β-Amino acid containing proteolitically stable dipeptide based hydrogels: encapsulation and sustained release of some important biomolecules at physiological pH and temperature. Soft Matter 8(12), 3380–3386 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM07168A/10.1039/C2SM07168A/ ↗