journal article·2022-09-08Open access

Iron nanoparticles for plant nutrition: Synthesis, transformation, and utilization by the roots of Cucumis sativus

Maria Gracheva, Zoltán Klencsár, Viktória Kovács Kis, Kende Attila Béres, Zoltán May, Viktória Halasy, Amarjeet Singh, Ferenc Fodor, Ádám Solti, László Ferenc Kiss, Gyula Tolnai, Zoltán Homonnay, Krisztina Kovács

Abstract

Abstract Nanotechnology has been evolving in the past decades as an alternative to conventional fertilizers. Ferrihydrite nanoparticles that model the available Fe pool of soils are proposed to be used to recover Fe deficiency of plants. Nevertheless, ferrihydrite aqueous suspensions are known to undergo slow transformation to a mixture of goethite and hematite, which may influence its biological availability. Several nanocolloid suspensions differing in the surfactant type were prepared for plant treatment and fully characterized by transmission electron microscopy and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy supported by magnetic measurements. The rate of transformation and the final mineral composition were revealed for all the applied surfactants. Nanomaterials at different stages of transformations were the subject of plant physiological experiments aiming at comparing the behavior and plant accessibility of the manufactured suspensions of nanoscale iron(III) oxide and oxide–hydroxide particles. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects · Banana Cultivation and Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. D.G. Merkel et al., Nanoscale (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR02928G10.1039/C5NR02928G ↗
2. D.G. Merkel et al., Mater. Res. Express (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1c8410.1088/2053-1591/ab1c84 ↗
3. J. Kalt et al., Phys. Rev. B (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.19541410.1103/PhysRevB.102.195414 ↗
4. D.G. Merkel et al., Sci. Rep. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70899-x10.1038/s41598-020-70899-x ↗
5. K.T. Nguyen et al., J. Mat. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-020-00011-610.1557/s43578-020-00011-6 ↗
6. J.A. Hernandez-Viezcas et al., ACS Nano (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn305196q10.1021/nn305196q ↗
7. A. Bour et al., J. Hazard. Mat. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.02110.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.021 ↗
8. A. Ebrahiminezhad et al., Green Process. Synth. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2016-013310.1515/gps-2016-0133 ↗
9. H. Tombuloglu et al., Chemosphere (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.07510.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.075 ↗
10. H. Tombuloglu et al., Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.10022310.1016/j.enmm.2019.100223 ↗
11. P. Sipos et al., J. Soils Sediments (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-02899-x10.1007/s11368-021-02899-x ↗
12. D. Carta et al., Mater. Chem. Phys. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.12210.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.122 ↗
13. R.M. Cornell, U. Schwertmann, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences, and Uses, vol. 2 (Wiley, Weinheim, 2003)10.1002/3527602097 ↗
14. U. Schwertmann, E. Murad, Clays Clay Miner. (1983). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1983.031040510.1346/CCMN.1983.0310405 ↗
15. K. Hockmann et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c0866010.1021/acs.est.0c08660 ↗
16. J. Yan, A.J. Frierdich, J.G. Catalano, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.01.01410.1016/j.gca.2022.01.014 ↗
17. K. Kovács et al., Planta (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0826-x10.1007/s00425-008-0826-x ↗
18. L. Marastoni et al., Plant Physiol. Biochem. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.01.01310.1016/j.plaphy.2019.01.013 ↗
19. J. Rodríguez-Celma et al., Front. Plant Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.0009810.3389/fpls.2019.00098 ↗
20. J. Spielmann, G. Vert, J. Exp. Bot. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa44110.1093/jxb/eraa441 ↗
21. A. Singh et al. to be published
22. Z. Homonnay et al., Hyperfine Interact. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-016-1334-110.1007/s10751-016-1334-1 ↗
23. E. Jansen et al., Appl. Phys. A (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339010117510.1007/s003390101175 ↗
24. J.G. Stevens, Mössbauer mineral handbook (Mössbauer Effect Data Center, Asheville, 1998)
25. M. Tadic et al., J. Alloys Compd. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.09910.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.099 ↗
26. D. Zysler, M. Vasquez Mansilla, D. Fiorani, Eur (J. B, Phys, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00306-710.1140/epjb/e2004-00306-7 ↗
27. C. Luo et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.00510.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.005 ↗
28. R.M. Cornell, W. Schneider, R. Giovanoli, Polyhedron (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5387(00)80544-610.1016/S0277-5387(00)80544-6 ↗
29. J.P.H. Perez et al., Environ. Sci. Nano (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EN00384D10.1039/D1EN00384D ↗
30. Ph. Refait et al., Hyperfine Interact. (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0240195710.1007/BF02401957 ↗
31. N. Van Groeningen et al., Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00063A10.1039/D0EM00063A ↗
32. E. Matijevic, Annu Rev. Mater. Sci. (1985). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.15.080185.00241110.1146/annurev.ms.15.080185.002411 ↗
33. M. Gracheva et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00188-110.1007/s43630-022-00188-1 ↗
34. S.O. Pehkonen, R.L. Siefert, M.R. Hoffmann, Environ. Sci. Technol. (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/es00005a01210.1021/es00005a012 ↗
35. Z. Klencsár, E. Kuzmann, A. Vértes, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0205541010.1007/bf02055410 ↗
36. J.L. Lábár, Microsc. Microanal. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192760808038010.1017/S1431927608080380 ↗
37. R.L. Blake et al., Am. Miner. 51, 123–129 (1966)
38. G.F. Smith et al., Analyst (1952). https://doi.org/10.1039/AN952770041810.1039/AN9527700418 ↗
39. https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html
40. http://cucurbitgenomics.org
41. B. Müller et al., Planta (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-3037-010.1007/s00425-018-3037-0 ↗
42. M.W. Pfaffl, Nucleic Acids Res. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e4510.1093/nar/29.9.e45 ↗