journal article·2021-06-28

A poroelastic master curve for time‐dependent and multiscale mechanics of hydrogels

Mohammad R. Islam, Michelle L. Oyen

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 36· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Mechanical properties of hydrogels are of considerable interest for applications including tissue engineering and drug delivery. However, mechanical characterization of hydrogels is inherently challenging due to their multiphasic construction. Under mechanical loading, internal fluid redistribution affects the gel response, leading to a time‐ and length‐scale‐dependent material behavior, known as poroelasticity. Traditional mechanical tests are effective for determining instantaneous flow‐independent gel response, and they are limited in characterizing poroelastic behavior as a function of loading time‐ and length‐scales. Here, micro‐ and nanoindentation experiments are combined to characterize the full range of poroelastic behavior of a hydrogel. A master curve is presented to demonstrate that the relative competition of poroelastic relaxation time with ramp loading time determines gel response across different time‐ and length‐scales. The master curve provides a novel mechanism to establish the instantaneous and equilibrium limits on the elastic modulus for a material, useful for designing hydrogel biomaterials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Blood properties and coagulation · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. T.R. Hoare and D.S. Kohane: Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer 49, 1993 (2008).10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 ↗
2. B. Baroli: Hydrogels for tissue engineering and delivery of tissue‐inducing substances. J. Pharm. Sci. 96, 2197 (2007).10.1002/jps.20873 ↗
3. A.J. Engler, S. Sen, H.L. Sweeney, and D.E. Discher: Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
4. M.L. Oyen: Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 59, 44 (2014).10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 ↗
5. M.L. Oyen: Nanoindentation of hydrated materials and tissues. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 19, 317 (2015).10.1016/j.cossms.2015.03.001 ↗
6. M. Galli, K.S. Comley, T.A. Shean, and M.L. Oyen: Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels. J. Mater. Res. 24, 973 (2009).10.1557/jmr.2009.0129 ↗
7. Y. Hu, X. Zhao, J.J. Vlassak, and Z. Suo: Using indentation to characterize the poroelasticity of gels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 121904 (2010).10.1063/1.3370354 ↗
8. X. Zhao, N. Huebsch, D.J. Mooney, and Z. Suo: Stress‐relaxation behavior in gels with ionic and covalent crosslinks. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 063509 (2010).10.1063/1.3343265 ↗
9. D.G. Strange, T.L. Fletcher, K. Tonsomboon, H. Brawn, X. Zhao, and M.L. Oyen: Separating poroviscoelastic deformation mechanisms in hydrogels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 031913 (2013).10.1063/1.4789368 ↗
10. Q.‐M. Wang, A.C. Mohan, M.L. Oyen, and X.‐H. Zhao: Separating viscoelasticity and poroelasticity of gels with different length and time scales. Acta Mech. Sin. 30, 20 (2014).10.1007/s10409-014-0015-z ↗
11. J.A. Wahlquist, F.W. DelRio, M.A. Randolph, A.H. Aziz, C.M. Heveran, S.J. Bryant, C.P. Neu, and V.L. Ferguson: Indentation mapping revealed poroelastic, but not viscoelastic, properties spanning native zonal articular cartilage. Acta Biomater. 64, 41 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.003 ↗
12. E. Moeendarbary, L. Valon, M. Fritzsche, A.R. Harris, D.A. Moulding, A.J. Thrasher, E. Stride, L. Mahadevan, and G.T. Charras: The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat. Mater. 12, 253 (2013).10.1038/nmat3517 ↗
13. M.L. Oyen, T.A. Shean, D.G. Strange, and M. Galli: Size effects in indentation of hydrated biological tissues. J. Mater. Res. 27, 245 (2012).10.1557/jmr.2011.322 ↗
14. Z.I. Kalcioglu, R. Mahmoodian, Y. Hu, Z. Suo, and K.J. Van Vliet: From macro‐to microscale poroelastic characterization of polymeric hydrogels via indentation. Soft Matter 8, 3393 (2012).10.1039/c2sm06825g ↗
15. B.G. Bush, J.M. Shapiro, F.W. DelRio, R.F. Cook, and M.L. Oyen: Mechanical measurements of heterogeneity and length scale effects in PEG‐based hydrogels. Soft Matter 11, 7191 (2015).10.1039/C5SM01210D ↗
16. M.H. Esteki, A.A. Alemrajabi, C.M. Hall, G.K. Sheridan, M. Azadi, and E. Moeendarbary: A new framework for characterization of poroelastic materials using indentation. Acta Biomater. 102, 138 (2020).10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.010 ↗
17. E.P. Chan, Y. Hu, P.M. Johnson, Z. Suo, and C.M. Stafford: Spherical indentation testing of poroelastic relaxations in thin hydrogel layers. Soft Matter 8, 1492 (2012).10.1039/C1SM06514A ↗
18. Y. Lai and Y. Hu: Probing the swelling‐dependent mechanical and transport properties of polyacrylamide hydrogels through AFM‐based dynamic nanoindentation. Soft Matter 14, 2619 (2018).10.1039/C7SM02351K ↗
19. J.D. Berry, M. Biviano, and R.R. Dagastine: Poroelastic properties of hydrogel microparticles. Soft Matter 16, 5314 (2020).10.1039/D0SM00191K ↗
20. D.G.T. Strange and M.L. Oyen: Composite hydrogels for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 11, 16 (2012).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.10.003 ↗
21. J.M. Shapiro and M.L. Oyen: Viscoelastic analysis of single‐component and composite PEG and alginate hydrogels. Acta Mech. Sin. 30, 7 (2014).10.1007/s10409-014-0025-x ↗
22. D.L. Holmes and N.C. Stellwagen: Estimation of polyacrylamide gel pore size from Ferguson plots of normal and anomalously migrating DNA fragments. I. Gels containing 3% N, N′‐methylenebisacrylamide. Electrophoresis 12, 253 (1991).10.1002/elps.1150120405 ↗
23. P.G. Gennes: Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, New York, 1979).
24. M. Reiner: The deborah number. Phys. Today 17, 62 (1964).10.1063/1.3051374 ↗
25. R.S. Lakes: Viscoelastic Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009).10.1017/CBO9780511626722 ↗
26. K.L. Johnson: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987).
27. L.K. Agbezuge and H. Deresiewicz: On the indentation of a consolidating half‐space. Israel J. Technol. 12, 322 (1974).
28. C.Y. Hui, Y.Y. Lin, F.C. Chuang, K.R. Shull, and W.C. Lin: A contact mechanics method for characterizing the elastic properties and permeability of gels. J. Polym. Sci., B: Polym. Phys. 44, 359 (2006).10.1002/polb.20613 ↗
29. M. Liu and H. Huang: Poroelastic response of spherical indentation into a half space with a drained surface via step displacement. Int. J. Solids Struct. 165, 34 (2019).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.026 ↗
30. J. Thurn, D.J. Morris, and R.F. Cook: Depth‐sensing indentation at macroscopic dimensions. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2679 (2002).10.1557/JMR.2002.0388 ↗
31. A.O. Moghaddam, J. Wei, J. Kim, A.C. Dunn, and A.J.W. Johnson: An indentation‐based approach to determine the elastic constants of soft anisotropic tissues. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 103, 103539 (2020).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103539 ↗
32. J.‐Y. Sun, X. Zhao, W.R. Illeperuma, O. Chaudhuri, K.H. Oh, D.J. Mooney, J.J. Vlassak, and Z. Suo: Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133 (2012).10.1038/nature11409 ↗