A new predictive model for calculating the hardness of metal matrix nanocomposites produced by mechanical alloying
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, it has been suggested that the gene expression programing is a good tool for determination of hardness of metal matrix nanocomposite produced by mechanical alloying (MA). For example, we studied the Al matrix nanocomposite, and to build the models, 35 input-target data were gathered from the literature, randomly divided into 28 and 7 data sets and then were respectively trained and tested by the proposed models. The differences between the models were in their gene number, chromosomes, and head size. The amount of reinforcement, ball to powder ratio, compaction pressure, milling time, reinforcement hardness, sintering temperature, sintering time, and vial speed were 8 independent input parameters. The output parameter was mean hardness of nanocomposites. The results indicate that gene expression programing is a powerful tool for predicting the hardness of the nanocomposite produced by MA.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Material Properties and Applications · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00815-X10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00815-X ↗
2. Analysis of knoop indentation of cohesive frictional materials10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.10.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.02810.1016/j.msea.2010.11.028 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.02710.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.027 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.12.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.12.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.05410.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.054 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.05910.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.059 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.00610.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.006 ↗
9. 10.5923/j.nn.20120203.0110.5923/j.nn.20120203.01 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.05.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2008.05.069 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-044452787-5.00095-010.1016/B978-044452787-5.00095-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.02510.1016/j.biocel.2008.09.025 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.13010.1016/j.msea.2007.02.130 ↗
15. Al–(L12)Al3 Ti nanocomposites prepared by mechanical alloying: Synthesis and mechanical properties10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.274 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.14610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.146 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.05310.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.053 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.00110.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/0142-9418(87)90030-410.1016/0142-9418(87)90030-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.00410.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00163-810.1016/S0261-3069(03)00163-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00658-610.1016/S0925-8388(98)00658-6 ↗
23. Empirical modeling of splitting tensile strength from cylinder compressive strength of concrete by genetic programming
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.14510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.145 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.02.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.02.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.05.01410.1016/j.ygeno.2012.05.014 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.06110.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.061 ↗