Hydrogel-integrated 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
There is currently a high demand for synthetic biodegradable scaffolds with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic performance for the regeneration of large-size bone defects. Here, hybrid scaffolds were prepared by integrating either alginate or alginate–bioglass composite hydrogels with a 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) (PLA) porous structure. The as-deposited PLA scaffolds were surface treated with polyacrylic acid (PAA), which significantly enhanced the PLA scaffold’s wettability. The surface-modified PLA scaffolds integrated well with hydrogels and provided shape and mechanical rigidity to the hydrogel. In phosphate-buffered saline, the lowest weight loss during 21-days immersion was measured for the PLA scaffold, while alginate–bioglass scaffolds lost ~ 1.9% weight during the first 7 days of immersion. In vitro cytocompatibility tests indicated good cell viability and cell proliferation on the scaffolds. The bioglass-containing hybrid scaffold promoted osteogenic differentiation and calcium mineralization. The excellent biocompatibility, good mechanical stability of the hydrogel, and shape retention of the novel hybrid scaffolds with cell-laden alginate could make them attractive for large bone regeneration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. W. Wang, K.W.K. Yeung, Bioactive materials bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioactive Mater. 2, 224–247 (2017)10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
2. Ž.P. Kačarević, P. Rider, S. Alkildani, S. Retnasingh, M. Pejakić, R. Schnettler, M. Gosau, R. Smeets, O. Jung, M. Barbeck, An introduction to bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Artif. Organs 43, 69–86 (2020)10.1177/0391398819876286 ↗
3. Bone graft substitute market research report – Global forecast till 2027, Market Research Future®, July 2019. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/bone-graft-substitutes-market-1195 accessed 23 Feb 2020.
4. V. Campana, G. Milano, E. Pagano, M. Barba, C. Cicione, G. Salonna, W. Lattanzi, G. Logrocino, Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 25, 2445–2461 (2014)10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 ↗
5. G. Fernandez de Grado, L. Keller, Y. Idoux-Gillet, Q. Wagner, A.M. Musset, N. Benkirane-Jessel, F. Bornert, D. Offner, Bone substitutes: A review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J. Tissue Eng. 9, 1–18 (2018)10.1177/2041731418776819 ↗
6. J. Henkel, M.A. Woodruff, D.R. Epari, R. Steck, V. Glatt, I.C. Dickinson, P.F.M. Choong, M.A. Schuetz, D.W. Hutmacher, Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions—A 21st century perspective. Bone Res. 1, 216–248 (2013)10.4248/BR201303002 ↗
7. A. Wubneh, E.K. Tsekoura, C. Ayranci, H. Uludağ, Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 80, 1–30 (2018)10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031 ↗
8. S. Bose, S. Vahabzadeh, A. Bandyopadhyay, Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater. Today 16, 496–504 (2013)10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
9. A. Grémare, V. Guduric, R. Bareille, V. Heroguez, S. Latour, N. Lheureux, J.-C. Fricain, S. Catros, D. Le Nihouannen, Characterization of printed PLA scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 106, 887–894 (2018)10.1002/jbm.a.36289 ↗
10. S. Gómez, M.D. Vlad, J. López, E. Fernández, Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 42, 341–350 (2016)10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 ↗
11. A. Entezari, I. Roohani, G. Li, C.R. Dunstan, P. Rognon, Q. Li, X. Jiang, H. Zreiqat, Architectural design of 3D printed scaffolds controls the volume and functionality of newly formed bone. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 8, 1801353 (2019)10.1002/adhm.201801353 ↗
12. R. Fairag, D.H. Rosenzweig, J.L. Ramirez-Garcialuna, M.H. Weber, L. Haglund, Three-dimensional printed polylacticacid scaffolds promote bone-like matrix deposition in vitro. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 15306–15315 (2019)10.1021/acsami.9b02502 ↗
13. S.-B. Hong, N. Eliaz, E.M. Sachs, S.M. Allen, R.M. Latanision, Corrosion behavior of advanced Ti-based alloys made by three-dimensional printing (3DP™) for biomedical applications. Corros. Sci. 43, 1781–1791 (2001)10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00181-5 ↗
14. S.-B. Hong, N. Eliaz, G.G. Leisk, E.M. Sachs, R.M. Latanision, S.M. Allen, A new Ti-5Ag alloy for customized prostheses by three-dimensional printing (3DP™). J. Dent. Res. 80, 860–863 (2001)10.1177/00220345010800030301 ↗
15. M. Das, V.K. Balla, T.S.S. Kumar, I. Manna, Fabrication of biomedical implants using laser engineered net shaping (LENS™). Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc. 72, 169–174 (2013)10.1080/0371750X.2013.851619 ↗
16. S. Stratton, N.B. Shelke, K. Hoshino, S. Rudraiah, S.G. Kumbar, Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioactive Mater. 1, 93–108 (2016)10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.11.001 ↗
17. G. Ratheesh, J.R. Venugopal, A. Chinappan, H. Ezhilarasu, A. Sadiq, S. Ramakrishna, 3D fabrication of polymeric scaffolds for regenerative therapy. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 1175–1194 (2017)10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00370 ↗
18. G. Narayanan, V.N. Vernekar, E.L. Kuyinu, C.T. Laurencin, Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 107, 247–276 (2016)10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.015 ↗
19. A. Gregor, E. Filová, M. Novák, J. Kronek, H. Chlup, M. Buzgo, V. Blahnová, V. Lukášová, M. Bartoš, A. Nečas, J. Hošek, Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. J. Biol. Eng. 11, 31 (2017)10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 ↗
20. S.R. Rajpurohit, H.K. Dave, Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 101, 1525–1536 (2019)10.1007/s00170-018-3047-x ↗
21. M.S. Singhvi, S.S. Zinjarde, D.V. Gokhale, Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127, 1612–1626 (2019)10.1111/jam.14290 ↗
22. H. Zhu, J. Ji, R. Lin, C. Gao, L. Feng, J. Shen, Surface engineering of poly(dl-lactic acid) by entrapment of alginate-amino acid derivatives for promotion of chondrogenesis. Biomaterials 23, 3141–3148 (2002)10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00058-3 ↗
23. H. Zhu, A. Ji, J. Shen, Surface engineering of poly (dl-lactic acid) by entrapment of biomacromolecules. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 23, 819–823 (2002)10.1002/1521-3927(20021001)23:14<819::AID-MARC819>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
24. K.S. Stankevich, N.V. Danilenko, R.M. Gadirov, S.I. Goreninskii, S.I. Tverdokhlebov, V.D. Filimonov, A new approach for the immobilization of poly(acrylic) acid as a chemically reactive cross-linker on the surface of poly(lactic) acid-based biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 71, 862–869 (2017)10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.078 ↗
25. K.S. Stankevich, A. Gudima, V.D. Filimonov, H. Klüter, E.M. Mamontova, S.I. Tverdokhlebov, J. Kzhyshkowska, Surface modification of biomaterials based on high-molecular polylactic acid and their effect on inflammatory reactions of primary human monocyte-derived macrophages: Perspective for personalized therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 51, 117–126 (2015)10.1016/j.msec.2015.02.047 ↗
26. P. Dinarvand, E. Seyedjafari, A. Shafiee, A.B. Jandaghi, A. Doostmohammadi, M.H. Fathi, S. Farhadian, M. Soleimani, New approach to bone tissue engineering: Simultaneous application of hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass coated on a poly(l-lactic acid) scaffold. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3, 4518–4524 (2011)10.1021/am201212u ↗
27. E. Baran, H. Erbil, Surface modification of 3D printed PLA objects by fused deposition modeling: A review. Colloids Interfaces 3, 43 (2019)10.3390/colloids3020043 ↗
28. S. Zeng, J. Ye, Z. Cui, J. Si, Q. Wang, X. Wang, K. Peng, W. Chen, Surface biofunctionalization of three-dimensional porous poly(lactic acid) scaffold using chitosan/OGP coating for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 77, 92–101 (2017)10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.220 ↗
29. S. Hassanajili, A. Karami-Pour, A. Oryan, T. Talaei-Khozani, Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 104, 109960 (2019)10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960 ↗
30. C.-H. Cheng, Y.-W. Chen, A. Kai-Xing Lee, C.-H. Yao, M.-Y. Shie, Development of mussel-inspired 3D-printed poly (lactic acid) scaffold grafted with bone morphogenetic protein-2 for stimulating osteogenesis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 30, 78 (2019)10.1007/s10856-019-6279-x ↗
31. M. Wang, P. Favi, X. Cheng, N.H. Golshan, K.S. Ziemer, M. Keidar, T.J. Webster, Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) surface nanomodified 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 46, 256–265 (2016)10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.030 ↗
32. X. Bai, M. Gao, S. Syed, J. Zhuang, X. Xu, X.-Q. Zhang, Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration. Bioactive Mater. 3, 401–417 (2018)10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006 ↗
33. K. Gkioni, S.C.G. Leeuwenburgh, T.E.L. Douglas, A.G. Mikos, J.A. Jansen, Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 16, 577–585 (2010)10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0462 ↗
34. J. Venkatesan, I. Bhatnagar, P. Manivasagan, K.-H. Kang, S.-K. Kim, Alginate composites for bone tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 72, 269–281 (2015)10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.008 ↗
35. P. Diaz-Rodriguez, P. Garcia-Triñanes, M.M. EchezarretaLópez, A. Santoveña, M. Landin, Mineralized alginate hydrogels using marine carbonates for bone tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 195, 235–242 (2018)10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.101 ↗
36. Y.H. Lee, B.W. Lee, Y.C. Jung, B.I. Yoon, H.M. Woo, B.J. Kang, Application of alginate microbeads as a carrier of bone morphogenetic protein-2 for bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 107, 286–294 (2019)10.1002/jbm.b.34119 ↗
37. A. Sosnik, Alginate particles as platform for drug delivery by the oral route: State-of-the-art. ISRNPharm. 2014, 926157 (2014)
38. M. Rezvanian, M.C.I.M. Amin, S.-F. Ng, Development and physicochemical characterization of alginate composite film loaded with simvastatin as a potential wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 137, 295–304 (2016)10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091 ↗
39. J. Sun, H. Tan, Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications. Materials 6, 1285–1309 (2013)10.3390/ma6041285 ↗
40. E.S. Place, L. Rojo, E. Gentleman, J.P. Sardinha, M.M. Stevens, Strontium- and zinc-alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 2713–2722 (2011)10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0059 ↗
41. M. Kim, W.-K. Jung, G. Kim, Bio-composites composed of a solid free-form fabricated polycaprolactone and alginate-releasing bone morphogenic protein and bone formation peptide for bone tissue regeneration. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 36, 1725–1734 (2013)10.1007/s00449-013-0947-x ↗
42. J. Hua, P.F. Ng, B. Fei, High-strength hydrogels: Microstructure design, characterization and applications. J. Polym. Sci. Part B 56, 1325–1335 (2018)10.1002/polb.24725 ↗
43. R.A. Pérez, J.-E. Won, J.C. Knowles, H.-W. Kim, Naturally and synthetic smart composite biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 471–496 (2013)10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.009 ↗
44. S. Pina, V.P. Ribeiro, C.F. Marques, F.R. Maia, T.H. Silva, R.L. Reis, J.M. Oliveira, Scaffolding strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Materials 12, 1824 (2019)10.3390/ma12111824 ↗
45. N. Eliaz, N. Metoki, Calcium phosphate bioceramics: A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials 10, 334 (2017)10.3390/ma10040334 ↗
46. J. Kundu, J.-H. Shim, J. Jang, S.-W. Kim, D.-W. Cho, An additive manufacturing-based PCL–alginate–chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9, 1286–1297 (2015)10.1002/term.1682 ↗
47. R. Donate, M. Monzón, M.E. Alemán-Domínguez, Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. e-Polymers 20, 571–599 (2020)10.1515/epoly-2020-0046 ↗
48. I. Fernández-Cervantes, M.A. Morales, R. Agustín-Serrano, M. Cardenas-García, P.V. Pérez-Luna, B.L. Arroyo-Reyes, A. Maldonado-García, Polylactic acid/sodium alginate/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with trabecular tissue morphology designed by a bone remodeling model using 3D printing. J. Mater. Sci. 54, 9478–9496 (2019)10.1007/s10853-019-03537-1 ↗
49. F.A.A. Al-Rub, M.M. Fares, T. Talafha, Poly(acrylic acid) grafted sodium alginate di-block hydrogels as efficient biosorbents: Structure–property relevance. J. Polym. Environ. 26, 2333–2345 (2018)10.1007/s10924-017-1104-4 ↗
50. H. Pirayesh, J.A. Nychka, Sol–gel synthesis of bioactive glass-ceramic 45S5 and its in vitro dissolution and mineralization behavior. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 1643–1650 (2013)10.1111/jace.12190 ↗
51. C.-C. Lin, L.-C. Huang, P. Shen, Na2CaSi2O6–P2O5 based bioactive glasses. Part 1: Elasticity and structure. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 3195–3203 (2005)10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.08.020 ↗
52. S. Sasaki, T. Asakura, Helix distortion and crystal structure of the α-form of poly(l-lactide). Macromolecules 36, 8385–8390 (2003)10.1021/ma0348674 ↗
53. J. Qian, Y. Kang, Z. Wei, W. Zhang, Fabrication and characterization of biomorphic 45S5 bioglass scaffold from sugarcane. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29, 1361–1364 (2009)10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.004 ↗
54. R. Auras, B. Harte, S. Selke, An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol. Biosci. 4, 835–864 (2004)10.1002/mabi.200400043 ↗
55. S. Shankar, L.F. Wang, J.W. Rhim, Incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the mechanical, water vapor barrier, UV-light barrier, and antibacterial properties of PLA-based nanocomposite films. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 93, 289–298 (2018)10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.002 ↗
56. J. Dong, Y. Ozaki, K. Nakashima, Infrared, Raman, and near-infrared spectroscopic evidence for the coexistence of various hydrogen-bond forms in poly(acrylic acid). Macromolecules 30, 1111–1117 (1997)10.1021/ma960693x ↗
57. A.C.S. Alcântara, P. Aranda, M. Darder, E. Ruiz-Hitzky, Bionanocomposites based on alginate–zein/layered double hydroxide materials as drug delivery systems. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 9495–9504 (2010)10.1039/c0jm01211d ↗
58. D.K. Owens, R.C. Wendt, Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1741–1747 (1969)10.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
59. F.E. Ciraldo, E. Boccardi, V. Melli, F. Westhauser, A.R. Boccaccini, Tackling bioactive glass excessive in vitro bioreactivity: Preconditioning approaches for cell culture tests. Acta Biomater. 75, 3–10 (2018)10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.019 ↗