journal article·2021-06-28Open access

Revealing the nanoindentation response of a single cell using a 3D structural finite element model

Wenjian Yang, Damien Lacroix, Lay Poh Tan, Jinju Chen

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 36· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract Changes in the apparent moduli of cells have been reported to correlate with cell abnormalities and disease. Indentation is commonly used to measure these moduli; however, there is evidence to suggest that the indentation protocol employed affects the measured moduli, which can affect our understanding of how physiological conditions regulate cell mechanics. Most studies treat the cell as a homogeneous material or a simple core–shell structure consisting of cytoplasm and a nucleus: both are far from the real structure of cells. To study indentation protocol-dependent cell mechanics, a finite element model of key intracellular components (cortex layer, cytoplasm, actin stress fibres, microtubules, and nucleus) has instead been developed. Results have shown that the apparent moduli obtained with conical indenters decreased with increasing cone angle; however, this change was less significant for spherical indenters of increasing radii. Furthermore, the interplay between indenter geometry and intracellular components has also been studied, which is useful for understanding structure-mechanics-function relationships of cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Diz-Muñoz, D.A. Fletcher, O.D. Weiner, Use the force: membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. Trends Cell Biol. 23(2), 47–53 (2013)10.1016/j.tcb.2012.09.006 ↗
2. O. Chaudhuri, D.J. Mooney, Stem-cell differentiation: anchoring cell-fate cues. Nat. Mater. 11(7), 568 (2012)10.1038/nmat3366 ↗
3. M.G. Haugh, C.M. Murphy, R.C. McKiernan, C. Altenbuchner, F.J. O’Brien, Crosslinking and mechanical properties significantly influence cell attachment, proliferation, and migration within collagen glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Tissue Eng. A 17(9–10), 1201–1208 (2011)10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0590 ↗
4. M. Lekka, P. Laidler, D. Gil, J. Lekki, Z. Stachura, A.Z. Hrynkiewicz, Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur. Biophys. J. 28(4), 312–316 (1999)10.1007/s002490050213 ↗
5. G.B. Nash, E. O’Brien, E.C. Gordon-Smith, J.A. Dormandy, Abnormalities in the mechanical properties of red blood cells caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Blood 74(2), 855–861 (1989)10.1182/blood.V74.2.855.855 ↗
6. S.J. Tan, Q. Li, C.T. Lim, Manipulation and isolation of single cells and nuclei. Methods Cell Biol. 98, 79–96 (2010)10.1016/S0091-679X(10)98004-7 ↗
7. M. Puig-de-Morales-Marinkovic, K.T. Turner, J.P. Butler, J.J. Fredberg, S. Suresh, Viscoelasticity of the human red blood cell. AJP Cell Physiol 293(2), C597–C605 (2007)10.1152/ajpcell.00562.2006 ↗
8. M. Dao, C.T. Lim, S. Suresh, Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51(11–12), 2259–2280 (2003)10.1016/j.jmps.2003.09.019 ↗
9. Q.S. Li, G.Y.H. Lee, C.N. Ong, C.T. Lim, AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374(4), 609–613 (2008)10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.078 ↗
10. S. Marcotti, G.C. Reilly, D. Lacroix, Effect of cell sample size in atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 94, 259–266 (2019)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.018 ↗
11. N. Gavara, R.S. Chadwick, Relationship between cell stiffness and stress fiber amount, assessed by simultaneous atomic force microscopy and live-cell fluorescence imaging. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 15(3), 511–523 (2016)10.1007/s10237-015-0706-9 ↗
12. K. Marina, R. Joostte, W. Katarina, Probing the compressibility of tumor cell nuclei by combined atomic force–confocal microscopy. Phys. Biol. 10(6), 065002 (2013)10.1088/1478-3975/10/6/065002 ↗
13. L. Ng, H.-H. Hung, A. Sprunt, S. Chubinskaya, C. Ortiz, A. Grodzinsky, Nanomechanical properties of individual chondrocytes and their developing growth factor-stimulated pericellular matrix. J. Biomech. 40(5), 1011–1023 (2007)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.004 ↗
14. J.J. Chen, Understanding the nanoindentation mechanisms of a microsphere for biomedical applications. J. Phys. D 46(49), 495303 (2013)10.1088/0022-3727/46/49/495303 ↗
15. J. Chen, G. Lu, Finite element modelling of nanoindentation based methods for mechanical properties of cells. J. Biomech. 45(16), 2810–2816 (2012)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.037 ↗
16. Y.M. Efremov, W.-H. Wang, S.D. Hardy, R.L. Geahlen, A. Raman, Measuring nanoscale viscoelastic parameters of cells directly from AFM force-displacement curves. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1541 (2017)10.1038/s41598-017-01784-3 ↗
17. Y. Liu, K. Mollaeian, J. Ren, Finite element modeling of living cells for AFM indentation-based biomechanical characterization. Micron 116, 108–115 (2019)10.1016/j.micron.2018.10.004 ↗
18. G. Ofek, R.M. Natoli, K.A. Athanasiou, In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. J. Biomech. 42(7), 873–877 (2009)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.024 ↗
19. G.T. Charras, M.A. Horton, Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling. Biophys. J. 83(2), 858–879 (2002)10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75214-4 ↗
20. G.T. Charras, M.A. Horton, Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophys. J. 82(6), 2970–2981 (2002)10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75638-5 ↗
21. P. Carl, H. Schillers, Elasticity measurement of living cells with an atomic force microscope: data acquisition and processing. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 457(2), 551 (2008)10.1007/s00424-008-0524-3 ↗
22. R. Vargas-Pinto, H. Gong, A. Vahabikashi, M. Johnson, The effect of the endothelial cell cortex on atomic force microscopy measurements. Biophys. J. 105(2), 300–309 (2013)10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.034 ↗
23. C.R. Guerrero, P.D. Garcia, R. Garcia, Subsurface imaging of cell organelles by force microscopy. ACS Nano 13(8), 9629–9637 (2019)10.1021/acsnano.9b04808 ↗
24. Y. Ding, J. Wang, G.-K. Xu, G.-F. Wang, Are elastic moduli of biological cells depth dependent or not? Another explanation using a contact mechanics model with surface tension. Soft Matter 14(36), 7534–7541 (2018)10.1039/C8SM01216D ↗
25. A.B. Mathur, A.M. Collinsworth, W.M. Reichert, W.E. Kraus, G.A. Truskey, Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. 34(12), 1545–1553 (2001)10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00149-X ↗
26. G.N. Peggs, I.C. Leigh, Recommended Procedure for Micro-indentation Vickers Hardness Test (UK National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, 1983)
27. X. Cai, H. Bangert, Hardness measurements of thin films-determining the critical ratio of depth to thickness using FEM. Thin Solid Films 264(1), 59–71 (1995)10.1016/0040-6090(95)06569-5 ↗
28. J. Chen, S.J. Bull, On the factors affecting the critical indenter penetration for measurement of coating hardness. Vacuum 83(6), 911–920 (2009)10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
29. N. Panich, Y. Sun, Effect of penetration depth on indentation response of soft coatings on hard substrates: a finite element analysis. Surf. Coat. Technol. 182(2–3), 342–350 (2004)10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.07.002 ↗
30. Z.-H. Xu, D. Rowcliffe, Finite element analysis of substrate effects on indentation behaviour of thin films. Thin Solid Films 447, 399–405 (2004)10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01071-X ↗
31. R.E. Mahaffy, C.K. Shih, F.C. MacKintosh, J. Käs, Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(4), 880 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.880 ↗
32. N. Guz, M. Dokukin, V. Kalaparthi, I. Sokolov, If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. Biophys. J. 107(3), 564–575 (2014)10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.033 ↗
33. C. Roduit, S. Sekatski, G. Dietler, S. Catsicas, F. Lafont, S.J. Kasas, Stiffness tomography by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 97(2), 674–677 (2009)10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.010 ↗
34. H. Schillers, M. Wälte, K. Urbanova, H. Oberleithner, Real-time monitoring of cell elasticity reveals oscillating myosin activity. Biophys. J. 99(11), 3639–3646 (2010)10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.048 ↗
35. A.A. Soufivand, M. Soleimani, M. Navidbakhsh, Is it appropriate to apply Hertz model to describe cardiac myocytes’ mechanical properties by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation? Micro Nano Lett. 9(3), 153–156 (2014)10.1049/mnl.2014.0019 ↗
36. J. Solon, I. Levental, K. Sengupta, P.C. Georges, P.A. Janmey, Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 93(12), 4453–4461 (2007)10.1529/biophysj.106.101386 ↗
37. U.G. Hofmann, C. Rotsch, W.J. Parak, M. Radmacher, Investigating the cytoskeleton of chicken cardiocytes with the atomic force microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 119(2), 84–91 (1997)10.1006/jsbi.1997.3868 ↗
38. S. Sagadevan, P. Murugasen, Novel analysis on the influence of tip radius and shape of the nanoindenter on the hardness of materials. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6, 1871–1878 (2014)10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.218 ↗
39. A.R. Harris, G.T. Charras, Experimental validation of atomic force microscopy-based cell elasticity measurements. Nanotechnology 22(34), 345102 (2011)10.1088/0957-4484/22/34/345102 ↗
40. J. Rheinlaender, T.E. Schäffer, Mapping the mechanical stiffness of live cells with the scanning ion conductance microscope. Soft Matter 9(12), 3230–3236 (2013)10.1039/c2sm27412d ↗
41. S. Barreto, C.H. Clausen, C.M. Perrault, D.A. Fletcher, D. Lacroix, A multi-structural single cell model of force-induced interactions of cytoskeletal components. Biomaterials 34(26), 6119–6126 (2013)10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.022 ↗
42. S. Barreto, C.M. Perrault, D. Lacroix, Structural finite element analysis to explain cell mechanics variability. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 38, 219–231 (2014)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.11.022 ↗
43. G.A. Clark, K. Dierkes, E.K. Paluch, Monitoring actin cortex thickness in live cells. Biophys. J. 105(3), 570–580 (2013)10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.057 ↗
44. S. Deguchi, T. Ohashi, M.J. Sato, Tensile properties of single stress fibers isolated from cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biomech. 39(14), 2603–2610 (2006)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.026 ↗
45. J. Chen, Nanobiomechanics of living cells: a review. Interface Focus 4(2), 20130055 (2014)10.1098/rsfs.2013.0055 ↗
46. Y. Ding, G.-K. Xu, G.-F. Wang, On the determination of elastic moduli of cells by AFM based indentation. Sci. Rep. 7, 45575 (2017)10.1038/srep45575 ↗
47. H. Liu, Y. Sun, C.A. Simmons, Determination of local and global elastic moduli of valve interstitial cells cultured on soft substrates. J. Biomech. 46(11), 1967–1971 (2013)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.001 ↗
48. K. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, London, 1985)10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
49. I.N. Sneddon, The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3(1), 47–57 (1965)10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
50. D. Ingber, Opposing Views on Tensegrity as a Structural Framework for Understanding Cell Mechanics-Rebuttals (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, 2000)
51. F. Guilak, V.C.J. Mow, The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell–matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 33(12), 1663–1673 (2000)10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00105-6 ↗
52. J. Stricker, T. Falzone, M.L.J. Gardel, Mechanics of the F-actin cytoskeleton. J. Biomech. 43(1), 9–14 (2010)10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.003 ↗
53. F. Pampaloni, E. Florin, Microtubule architecture: inspiration for novel carbon nanotube-based biomimetic materials. Trends Biotechnol. 26(6), 302–310 (2008)10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.002 ↗