journal article·2019-08-28

Potential of electrical discharge treatment to enhance the in vitro cytocompatibility and tribological performance of Co–Cr implant

Amit Mahajan, Sarabjeet Singh Sidhu

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

In the current research, the application and capability of electric discharge treatment (EDT) for enhancing the cytocompatibility and tribological properties of medical-grade Co–Cr alloy were investigated. The Co–Cr specimens were treated by copper tungsten (Cu–W) electrode in a deionized water tank (dielectric medium) at different spark energy levels. To examine the cytocompatibility of substrates, the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay was performed to evaluate the substrate cell viability. Furthermore, the wear rate and coefficient of friction of the substrates were examined on a pin-on-disc tribometer. In vitro cytocompatibility results revealed that the % viability of the MG-63 cells on EDT sample was approximately two times improved compared with that on the untreated surface. The tribological results showed that the treated samples have better friction reducing properties and four times higher wear resistance compared with unmachined Co–Cr samples. The surface modification at 10 A current and 60 µs pulse on-time and 150 µs off-time were found as significant parameters in both assessments.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Studies on camptothecin: I. Effects on nucleic acid and protein synthesis
2. 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.06610.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.066 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.00910.1016/j.msec.2010.07.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.02010.1016/j.addma.2019.04.020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.05310.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.053 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.06.01810.1016/j.triboint.2018.06.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.06.08110.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.06.081 ↗
8. 10.1080/10667857.2018.147514410.1080/10667857.2018.1475144 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.06510.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.065 ↗
10. Effect of tribochemical reaction on wear of silicon carbide for joint prostheses
11. Characterization of osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63, Saos-2 and U-2 OS in comparison to human osteoblasts
12. 10.1080/10426914.2016.115104310.1080/10426914.2016.1151043 ↗
13. 10.1080/10667857.2017.137797110.1080/10667857.2017.1377971 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670844.2018.145906710.1080/02670844.2018.1459067 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.2001.022010.1557/JMR.2001.0220 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11661-002-0109-210.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 ↗
18. Sahasrabudhe · 2016
19. 10.1039/c3ra44483j10.1039/c3ra44483j ↗
20. 10.1089/neu.2009.094810.1089/neu.2009.0948 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.08.00710.1016/j.triboint.2012.08.007 ↗
22. 10.1557/jmr.2019.7310.1557/jmr.2019.73 ↗
23. Multilevel numerical model of hip joint accounting for friction in the hip resurfacing endoprosthesis
24. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.00410.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.004 ↗
25. 10.1510/icvts.2006.14639910.1510/icvts.2006.146399 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00730-210.1016/S0257-8972(02)00730-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.02210.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.07410.1016/j.wear.2012.11.074 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.06210.1016/j.wear.2010.12.062 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2014.16310.1557/jmr.2014.163 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.00510.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/0010-938X(95)80004-210.1016/0010-938X(95)80004-2 ↗
33. Bose · 2017 · 1
34. 10.3390/ma805274910.3390/ma8052749 ↗
35. Experimental investigation of optimal ED machining parameters for Ti–6Al–4V biomaterial
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.00710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.007 ↗