journal article·2012-12-28

The indentation hardness of silicon measured by instrumented indentation: What does it mean?

Bianca Haberl, Leonardus Bimo Bayu Aji, J.S. Williams, Jodie E. Bradby

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

The indentation hardness of three different pure forms of silicon was investigated by two different methods. The hardness was probed by direct imaging of the residual impressions and by instrumented indentation using the Oliver-Pharr method. The forms of silicon used were a defective form of amorphous silicon, an amorphous form close to a continuous random network, and a crystalline silicon. The first form deforms via plastic flow and the latter two via phase transition. Two different unloading rates, fast and slow, were used to vary the phase transition behavior. This influenced the relative hardness as measured by instrumented indentation, which is not a reliable method to quantify hardness values in phase transforming materials. Thus, for our phase transforming silicon system, the relative hardness between samples can only be determined correctly by direct imaging, provided that the image accurately reveals the extent of the phase transformed volume.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. High pressure crystalline phase formation during nanoindentation: Amorphous versus crystalline silicon
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.407210.1103/PhysRevB.52.4072 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.03520510.1103/PhysRevB.78.035205 ↗
4. 29. Hysitron, TriboScan. (Minneapolis, MN, 2011).
5. 10.1557/JMR.1999.004210.1557/JMR.1999.0042 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.15520910.1103/PhysRevB.79.155209 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1352010.1103/PhysRevB.60.13520 ↗
8. 10.1002/sia.277710.1002/sia.2777 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.33810.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.338 ↗
10. Williams · 1990 · 308 · 571
11. 10.1063/1.221076710.1063/1.2210767 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.183275710.1063/1.1832757 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
14. Phase transformations in silicon under contact loading
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.03610.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.036 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.2001.020910.1557/JMR.2001.0209 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.133211010.1063/1.1332110 ↗
18. 10.1088/0034-4885/64/4/20210.1088/0034-4885/64/4/202 ↗
19. 10.1002/pssa.221014012110.1002/pssa.2210140121 ↗
20. 10.1557/JMR.1991.112910.1557/JMR.1991.1129 ↗
21. 10.1557/jmr.2007.013510.1557/jmr.2007.0135 ↗
22. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.1999.031010.1557/JMR.1999.0310 ↗
24. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.15520410.1103/PhysRevB.77.155204 ↗
26. 10.1557/JMR.1992.096110.1557/JMR.1992.0961 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.370210.1103/PhysRevB.44.3702 ↗
28. Tabor · 1951
29. 30. Rusband W. : ImageJ 1.41o (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2008). http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199910)30:10<939::AID-JRS460>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199910)30:10<939::AID-JRS460>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.2007.040610.1557/JMR.2007.0406 ↗
32. 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.86310.1103/RevModPhys.75.863 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.21210110.1103/PhysRevB.67.212101 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.67.085205 ↗
35. 10.1038/271732a010.1038/271732a0 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.11467510.1063/1.114675 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.278139410.1063/1.2781394 ↗
38. 36. Haberl B. : Structural characterization of amorphous silicon. Ph.D. Thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 2010.