High strain rate compression behaviour of 3D printed Carbon-PA
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the last few years, Fused Filament Fabrication is growing in the industrial field for the manufacture of final products by using new materials with high mechanical performances. Among those, one of the strongest is Carbon-PA. This is a composite material made by Nylon thermoplastic matrix filled with short carbon fibers reinforces. The aim of this work is to investigate its mechanical properties in static and dynamic conditions. Cylindrical specimens were produced by extruding the material in the three main printing directions. Then, uniaxial quasi-static and dynamic compression tests have been performed to evaluate its strain rate sensitivity. Dynamic tests have been carried out through a direct Split Hopkinson Bar setup with a pulse-shaping technique. The results show a compression behaviour dependent on the printing direction and strain rate. The behaviour of Carbon-PA was different between static and dynamic condition, passing from ductile to brittle. Moreover, a tomography analysis was carried out on the samples to evaluate the voids distribution. Graphic abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. F.M. Mwema, E.T. Akinlabi, Fused Deposition Modeling (Springer, Cham, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48259-6_110.1007/978-3-030-48259-6_1 ↗
2. M. Srivastava, S. Rathee, S. Maheshwari, T.K. Kundra, Additive Manufacturing: Fundamentals and Advancements (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1201/978135104938210.1201/9781351049382 ↗
3. N. Guo, M.C. Leu, Front. Mech. Eng. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
4. A.D. Valino, J.R.C. Dizon, A.H. Espera Jr., Q. Chen, J. Messman, R.C. Advincula, Prog. Polym. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10116210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 ↗
5. N. van de Werken, J. Hurley, P. Khanbolouki, A.N. Sarvestani, A.Y. Tamijani, M. Tehrani, Compos. Part B: Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.09410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.094 ↗
6. F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei, S. Wang, Compos. Part B: Eng. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
7. M. Somireddy, C.V. Singh, A. Czekanski, Eng. Fail. Anal. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.10423210.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104232 ↗
8. R.T.L. Ferreira, I.C. Amatte, T.A. Dutra, D. Bürger, Compos. Part B: Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
9. A. Gupta, I. Fidan, S. Hasanov, A. Nasirov, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z10.1007/s00170-020-05195-z ↗
10. L.G. Blok, M.L. Longana, H. Yu, B.K.S. Woods, Addit. Manuf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
11. L. Thijs, M.L. Montero Sistiaga, R. Wauthle, Q. Xie, J.-P. Kruth, J. Van Humbeeck, Acta Mater. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.03610.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.036 ↗
12. N.S. Hmeidat, R.C. Pack, S.J. Talley, R.B. Moore, B.G. Compton, Addit. Manuf. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10138510.1016/j.addma.2020.101385 ↗
13. S. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy, P.K. Wright, Rapid Prototyp. J. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
14. N. van de Werken, J. Hurley, P. Khanbolouki, A.N. Sarvestani, A.Y. Tamijani, M. Tehrani, Compos. Part: B Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.09410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.094 ↗
15. S. Bhandari, R.A. Lopez-Anido, D.J. Gardner, Addit. Manuf. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092210.1016/j.addma.2019.100922 ↗
16. W.M.H. Verbeeten, M. Lorenzo-Bañuelos, P.J. Arribas-Subiñas, Addit. Manuf. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10096810.1016/j.addma.2019.100968 ↗
17. C. Casavola, A. Cazzato, V. Moramarco, G. Renna, Materials (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1208129510.3390/ma12081295 ↗
18. S.N. Aishah Majid, M.R. Alkahari, F.R. Ramli, S. Maidin, C.F. Tan, M.N. Sudin, J. Mech. E, pp. 185–197. ISSN 18235514 (2017)
19. M. Utzeri, M. Sasso, G. Chiappini, S. Lenci, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404891310.1115/1.4048913 ↗
20. A. du Plessis, B.J. Olawuyi, W.P. Boshoff, Mater. Struct. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0519-910.1617/s11527-014-0519-9 ↗
21. R. Othman (ed.), The Kolsky-Hopkinson Bar Machine: Selected Topics (Springer, Berlin, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71919-110.1007/978-3-319-71919-1 ↗
22. W. Chen, B. Song, Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar (Springer, Boston, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-710.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 ↗
23. E. Mancini, M. Sasso, M. Rossi, G. Chiappini, G. Newaz, D. Amodio, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-015-0019-110.1007/s40870-015-0019-1 ↗
24. M. Sasso, G. Newaz, D. Amodio, Mater. Sci. Eng., A (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.04210.1016/j.msea.2007.10.042 ↗
25. G. Mirone, R. Barbagallo, D. Corallo, S. Di Bella, Procedia Struct. Integr. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.29510.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.295 ↗
26. E. Farotti, E. Mancini, T. Bellezze, M. Sasso, J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-019-00218-710.1007/s40870-019-00218-7 ↗
27. M. Sasso, M.G. Antonelli, E. Mancini, M. Radoni, D. Amodio, Int. J. Impact Eng (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.02010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.020 ↗
28. M. Sasso, A. Forcellese, M. Simoncini, D. Amodio, E. Mancini, Key Engineering Materials (Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Bäch, 2015)
29. B. Song, W. Chen, Exp. Mech. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0242789710.1007/bf02427897 ↗
30. T.P.M. Johnson, S.S. Sarva, S. Socrate, Exp. Mech. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-009-9305-y10.1007/s11340-009-9305-y ↗
31. R. Gerlach, S.K. Sathianathan, C. Siviour, N. Petrinic, Int. J. Impact Eng (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.007 ↗