Thermal shock resistance of double-layer thermal barrier coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
To reveal the thermal shock resistance of double-layer thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), two types of TBCs were preparedviaatmospheric plasma spraying, i.e., Gd2Zr2O7/yttria-stabilized zirconia (GZ/YSZ) TBCs and La2Zr2O7(LZ)/YSZ TBCs, respectively. Subsequently, thermal cycling tests of the two TBCs were conducted at 1100 °C and their thermal shock resistance and failure mechanism were comparatively investigated through experiments and the finite element method. The results showed that the thermal shock failure of the two TBCs occurred inside the top ceramic coating. However, the GZ/YSZ TBCs had longer thermal cycling life. It was the mechanical properties of the top ceramic coating, and the thermal stresses arising from the thermal mismatch between the top ceramic coating and the substrate that determined the thermal cycling life of the two TBCs together. Compared with the LZ layer in the LZ/YSZ TBCs, the GZ layer in the GZ/YSZ TBCs had smaller elastic modulus, larger fracture toughness, and smaller thermal stresses, which led to the higher crack propagation resistance and less spallation tendency of the GZ/YSZ TBCs. Therefore, the GZ/YSZ TBCs exhibited superior thermal shock resistance to the LZ/YSZ TBCs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11998-018-0053-810.1007/s11998-018-0053-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.10910.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.109 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11666-020-00990-210.1007/s11666-020-00990-2 ↗
4. Effect of Nb and Ta dopants on mechanical and thermal properties of tetragonal YSZ: First-principles calculations
5. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.09.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2011.09.028 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.05710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.057 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.06.05110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.06.051 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.04010.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.040 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.25910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.259 ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2014.31910.1557/jmr.2014.319 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.15110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.151 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.11.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.11.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.19610.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.196 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.33310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.333 ↗
16. 10.1111/jace.1686210.1111/jace.16862 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11998-008-9138-010.1007/s11998-008-9138-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.038 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11661-003-0320-910.1007/s11661-003-0320-9 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11666-009-9307-410.1007/s11666-009-9307-4 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03473.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03473.x ↗
22. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000039710.1179/1743294414Y.0000000397 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.25110.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.251 ↗
24. 10.1361/1059963042044310.1361/10599630420443 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.01410.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.014 ↗
26. Characterization of TBC systems with NiPtAl or NiCoCrAlYTa bond coatings after thermal cycling at 1100 degrees C: A comparative study of failure mechanisms
27. 10.1557/jmr.2020.1510.1557/jmr.2020.15 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.11.00710.1016/j.matchar.2018.11.007 ↗
29. Delin · 2010
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.05210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.052 ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00186.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00186.x ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.06010.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.060 ↗
33. Novel low thermal conductivity ceramic materials for thermal barrier coatings
34. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.05010.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.050 ↗