An energy-based nanoindentation method to assess localized residual stresses and mechanical properties on shot-peened materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Concurrently assessing localized residual stresses and mechanical properties in cases where there are gradients in stresses and properties (such as those resulting in metallic alloys from shot peening processes) is challenging. Most indentation-based stress measurements assume uniform properties, which is not necessarily the case in this common industrial process. By using the energy envelope describing the total work of indentation by a load–displacement curve from instrumented indentation, localized residual stresses after shot peening were evaluated experimentally. A framework is developed to describe the appropriate indentation depth at which to assess properties that effectively define the volumetric resolution of the method. The residual stresses predicted via the nanoindentation experiment and energy analysis were validated with X-ray measurement of residual stresses on a shot-peened 52100 steel. The energy method can be applied directly from the indentation load–displacement curve without considering the contact area.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.1996.000310.1557/JMR.1996.0003 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00010-X10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00010-X ↗
3. Sov. Phys. Dokl. · 1981 · 26 · 769771
4. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.07.02610.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.07.026 ↗
6. J. Mater. Res. · 2004 · 3 · 12
7. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.05.01510.1016/j.commatsci.2011.05.015 ↗
8. Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 2006 · 242 · 8892
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.00210.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.002 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2001.028610.1557/JMR.2001.0286 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009210.1557/JMR.1996.0092 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00122-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00122-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.02110.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.021 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-014-8792-010.1007/s10853-014-8792-0 ↗
15. J. Mater. Res · 1995 · 11 · 752
16. J. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 46 · 83
17. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.029 ↗
19. Mech. Mater. · 2012 · 53 · 73
20. 2003 · 13
21. JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data · 1997 · 2 · 1254
22. J. JSNDI. · 1990 · 39 · 666
23. Japan Soc. Mater. Sci. · 1981 · 54 · 225
24. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009110.1557/JMR.1996.0091 ↗
25. Tribol. Lett. · 2012 · 31 · 42
26. Z. Met. · 2003 · 94 · 807812
27. New J. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 215
28. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1998 · 46 · 411425
29. 1951
30. 10.2472/jsms.27.25110.2472/jsms.27.251 ↗