journal article·2020-05-28

Compressive failure of hydrogel spheres

Jeremiah D. James, Jacob M. Ludwick, Mackenzie L. Wheeler, Michelle L. Oyen

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrogels have gained recent attention for biomedical applications because of their large water content, which imparts biocompatibility. However, their mechanical properties can be limiting. There has been significant recent interest in the strength and fracture toughness of hydrogel materials in addition to their stiffness and time-dependent behavior. Hydrogels can fail in a brittle manner, although they are extremely compliant. In this work, the failure and fracture of hydrogels are examined using a compression test of spherical hydrogel particles. Spheres of commercially available polyacrylamide–potassium polyacrylate were hydrated and tested to failure in compression as a function of loading rate. The spheres exhibited little relaxation when compressed to small fixed displacements. The distributions of strength values obtained were examined in a particle fracture framework previously used for brittle ceramics. There was loading rate dependence apparent in the measured peak force and calculated peak strength values, but the data fell on a single empirical distribution function of strength for the hydrogels regardless of loading rate. Strength values for these hydrogels were mostly in the range of 0.05–0.3 MPa, illustrating the challenges using hydrogels for mechanically demanding applications such as tissue engineering.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Elasticity and Material Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.2290410.1002/app.22904 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.06.01810.1016/j.jmps.2019.06.018 ↗
3. Numerical simulation of compression breakage of spherical particle10.1016/j.ces.2017.08.003 ↗
4. A crusher for single particle testing10.1063/1.1147644 ↗
5. 10.1299/jsmea1993.36.2_19710.1299/jsmea1993.36.2_197 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.290340810.1115/1.2903408 ↗
7. 10.1115/1.290340710.1115/1.2903407 ↗
8. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
9. Strength distribution of particles under compression10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.023 ↗
10. Dynamics of swelling and drying in a spherical gel10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.064010 ↗
11. Uniaxial compression tests and the validity of indirect tensile strength10.1007/BF03372161 ↗
12. 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90058-110.1016/0021-9290(83)90058-1 ↗
13. Fracture of articular cartilage10.1115/1.2796042 ↗
14. 10.1002/pol.1953.12010030310.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
15. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/04660110.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046601 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.015 ↗
17. 10.1002/term.189210.1002/term.1892 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.10944810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109448 ↗
19. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels10.1038/nature11409 ↗
20. Why are double network hydrogels so tough?10.1039/b924290b ↗
21. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002210.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 ↗
22. Tough composite hydrogels with high loading and local release of biological drugs10.1002/adhm.201701393 ↗
23. 10.1016/0148-9062(67)90046-010.1016/0148-9062(67)90046-0 ↗
24. Composite electrospun gelatin fiber-alginate gel scaffolds for mechanically robust tissue engineered cornea10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.001 ↗
25. Cartilage-like electrostatic stiffening of responsive cryogel scaffolds10.1038/srep42948 ↗
26. Large deformations of a rubber sphere under diametrical compression (Part I: Theoretical analysis of press approach, contact radius, and lateral extension)10.1299/jsmea1993.36.2_190 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.09.00110.1016/j.tibtech.2014.09.001 ↗
28. Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.05310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.053 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.09610.1016/j.msec.2017.05.096 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.02510.1016/j.msec.2016.11.025 ↗