journal article·2013-07-28

Compression behavior of magnesium/carbon nanotube composites

Qizhen Li, Bing Tian

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced magnesium (Mg) matrix composites were synthesized using a powder metallurgical method and tested compressively along the plane normal and in-plane orientations. Yield strengths of composites were significantly increased by 35–129% compared with that of pure Mg. With the increase of CNT weight percentage, yield strength first increased until reaching a critical CNT weight percentage and then decreased. Twinning operated in the in-plane samples when CNT weight percentage was less than or equal to 0.5%, whereas twinning operation was not observed in all plane normal samples and the in-plane samples with 1% or higher CNT weight percentage. Severe plastic deformation was exhibited in fracture surface images with low magnification, whereas intrinsic brittle fracture feature was observed under high magnification. A theoretical model incorporating the Orowan strengthening and the thermal expansion mismatch strengthening was utilized and made good yield strength predictions.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Dieter · 1986 · 212
2. Collins · 2000 · 62
3. Hertzberg · 1996
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.020 ↗
5. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/1/00210.1088/0957-4484/17/1/002 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssa.20040904510.1002/pssa.200409045 ↗
7. 10.1002/1527-2648(200007)2:7<416::AID-ADEM416>3.0.CO;2-Y10.1002/1527-2648(200007)2:7<416::AID-ADEM416>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
8. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00963-710.1016/S0921-5093(01)00963-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.04.10610.1016/j.jallcom.2004.04.106 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.04410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.05210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.052 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.11610.1016/j.msea.2012.01.116 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.10.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.10.017 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.2010.010410.1557/JMR.2010.0104 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.04910.1016/j.msea.2010.03.049 ↗
18. Avedesian · 1999
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.01210.1016/j.msea.2013.03.012 ↗
20. Yakobson · 2000
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.05910.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.059 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00265-810.1016/S0008-6223(02)00265-8 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.2010.012310.1557/JMR.2010.0123 ↗
24. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.358587010.1063/1.3585870 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.023 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01283-110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01283-1 ↗
28. 10.1557/jmr.2007.011210.1557/jmr.2007.0112 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.10.05210.1016/j.polymer.2008.10.052 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.016 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.06110.1016/j.msea.2011.03.061 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.06510.1016/j.msea.2010.02.065 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.04010.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.040 ↗
34. 10.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-210.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.02810.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.028 ↗