Determination of the strain-rate sensitivity of ultrafine-grained materials by spherical nanoindentation
Source abstract
Abstract
The strain-rate sensitivity of the flow stress represents a crucial parameter for characterizing the deformation kinetics of a material. In this work a new method was developed and validated for determining the local strain-rate sensitivity of the flow stress at different plastic strains. The approach is based on spherical nanoindentation strain-rate jump tests during one deformation experiment. In the case of ultrafine-grained Al and ultrafine-grained Cu good agreement between this technique and macroscopic compression tests has been achieved. In contrast to this, individual spherical nanoindentation experiments at constant strain-rates resulted in unrealistically high strain-rate sensitivities for both materials because of drift influences. Microstructural investigations of the residual spherical imprints on ultrafine-grained Al and ultrafine-grained Cu revealed significant differences regarding the deformation structure. For ultrafine-grained Cu considerably less activity of grain boundary sliding has been observed compared to ultrafine-grained Al.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2013.3910.1557/jmr.2013.39 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.07.03710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.07.037 ↗
3. 10.1557/jmr.2006.032410.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
4. Tabor · 1951
5. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper10.1515/crll.1882.92.156 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.00810.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-710.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.06410.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064 ↗
9. 10.1002/adem.20030658210.1002/adem.200306582 ↗
10. 10.1557/jmr.2011.15610.1557/jmr.2011.156 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-6 ↗
12. 10.1557/PROC-130-1310.1557/PROC-130-13 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.02310.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.023 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20050006910.1002/adma.200500069 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.2002.000210.1557/JMR.2002.0002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.12.022 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.022 ↗
18. 18. Juliano T.F. , Vanlandingham M.R. , Weerasooriya T. , and Moy P. : Extracting stress–strain and compressive yield stress information from spherical indentation (Army Research Lab Final Report, Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, 2007).
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-010.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.043 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00103-X10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00103-X ↗
23. 10.1007/s10853-011-5859-z10.1007/s10853-011-5859-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.03.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.03.012 ↗