Micromechanical modeling of fatigue crack initiation in polycrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Fatigue is an important mechanism for the failure of components in many engineering applications and a significant proportion of the fatigue life is spent in the crack initiation phase. Although a large number of research work addresses fatigue life and fatigue crack growth, the problem of modeling crack initiation remains a major challenge in the scientific and engineering community. In the present work, a micromechanical model is developed and applied to study fatigue crack initiation. In particular, the effect of different hardening mechanisms on fatigue crack initiation is investigated. To accomplish this, a model describing the evolution of the particular dislocation structures observed under cyclic plastic deformation is implemented and applied on randomly generated representative microstructures to investigate fatigue crack initiation. Finally, a method is presented to calculate the S-N curve for the polycrystalline materials. With this work, it is demonstrated how the micromechanical modeling can support the understanding of damage and failure mechanisms occurring during fatigue.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1986.tb01207.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1986.tb01207.x ↗
2. 10.1017/CBO978051175544610.1017/CBO9780511755446 ↗
3. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00186.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00186.x ↗
4. 10.1063/1.170895310.1063/1.1708953 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.005 ↗
6. 10.1520/STP14251S10.1520/STP14251S ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.001 ↗
8. The growth behaviour of microstructurally small fatigue cracks in metals
9. 10.1115/1.356458010.1115/1.3564580 ↗
10. 43. Sandia National Laboratories, CUBIT 13.2., 2013.
11. 10.1520/STP35885S10.1520/STP35885S ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.05810.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 ↗
13. Boeff · 2016
14. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00021-810.1016/S0013-7944(02)00021-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/0025-5416(84)90118-610.1016/0025-5416(84)90118-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.018 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.03010.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.030 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00014-510.1016/S0142-1123(97)00014-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.06.00110.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.06.001 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1982.tb01250.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1982.tb01250.x ↗
21. 10.1007/s11661-006-0216-610.1007/s11661-006-0216-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.001 ↗
23. Miller · 1997 · 27 · 26710.1520/STP16238S ↗
24. Bathias · 2004 · 18510.1201/9780203020609 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01306.x10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01306.x ↗
26. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00550.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00550.x ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0264870910.1007/BF02648709 ↗
28. 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X10.1016/0022-5096(71)90010-X ↗
29. 10.1098/rspa.2003.125810.1098/rspa.2003.1258 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.318378310.1115/1.3183783 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.315759910.1115/1.3157599 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.05310.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.053 ↗
33. Sharaf · 2015
34. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.01.00710.1016/j.mechmat.2010.01.007 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11663-009-9240-410.1007/s11663-009-9240-4 ↗
36. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.007 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003 ↗
39. Mahmoody · 2007
40. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.008 ↗
41. 10.1002/pssa.221104010810.1002/pssa.2211040108 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0028139310.1007/BF00281393 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00971.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00971.x ↗
44. 10.1098/rspa.1976.002710.1098/rspa.1976.0027 ↗
45. Castelluccio · 2012