journal article·2014-11-14

A critical examination of the paradox of strength and ductility in ultrafine-grained metals

Tarang Mungole, Praveen Kumar, Megumi Kawasaki, Terence G. Langdon

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 29· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

The paradox of strength and ductility is now well established and denotes the difficulty of simultaneously achieving both high strength and high ductility. This paradox was critically examined using a cast Al–7%Si alloy processed by high-pressure torsion (HPT) for up to 10 turns at a temperature of either 298 or 445 K. This processing reduces the grain size to a minimum of ∼0.4 µm and also decreases the average size of the Si particles. The results show that samples processed to high numbers of HPT turns exhibit both high strength and high ductility when tested at relatively low strain rates and the strain rate sensitivity under these conditions is ∼0.14 which suggests that flow occurs by some limited grain boundary sliding and crystallographic slip. The results are also displayed on the traditional diagram for strength and ductility and they demonstrate the potential for achieving high strength and high ductility by increasing the number of turns in HPT.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20130041310.1002/adem.201300413 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.09610.1016/j.msea.2004.01.096 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-012-7065-z10.1007/s10853-012-7065-z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.03210.1016/j.msea.2009.06.032 ↗
5. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90326-310.1016/0956-7151(94)90326-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
7. On the question of low-temperature sliding at grain boundaries
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.03110.1016/j.msea.2009.06.031 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11661-006-0138-310.1007/s11661-006-0138-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.02710.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.027 ↗
11. 10.1557/mrc.2012.1110.1557/mrc.2012.11 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.10210.1016/j.msea.2010.10.102 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.029 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-010-4530-410.1007/s10853-010-4530-4 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-012-6400-810.1007/s10853-012-6400-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.04010.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.040 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20080021410.1002/adma.200800214 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20050006910.1002/adma.200500069 ↗
19. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570454.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570454.001.0001 ↗
20. 10.1557/S088376940005155110.1557/S0883769400051551 ↗
21. 10.1016/0956-716X(94)90213-510.1016/0956-716X(94)90213-5 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat118010.1038/nmat1180 ↗
23. 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/30310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10853-012-7072-010.1007/s10853-012-7072-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11837-006-0213-710.1007/s11837-006-0213-7 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20060031010.1002/adma.200600310 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-009-3780-510.1007/s10853-009-3780-5 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.22410510.1103/PhysRevB.64.224105 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.138400010.1063/1.1384000 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.031 ↗
32. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90322-010.1016/0956-7151(94)90322-0 ↗
33. 10.1557/JMR.1998.005710.1557/JMR.1998.0057 ↗
34. 10.1557/JMR.2002.000210.1557/JMR.2002.0002 ↗
35. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.100110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.1001 ↗
36. 10.1002/adem.20031007810.1002/adem.200310078 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00955-110.1016/S1359-6462(01)00955-1 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10853-006-6476-010.1007/s10853-006-6476-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.02210.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.022 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10853-010-4588-z10.1007/s10853-010-4588-z ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.08.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.08.014 ↗
42. 10.1038/nature0113310.1038/nature01133 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00283-510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00283-5 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10853-012-7061-310.1007/s10853-012-7061-3 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.287001410.1063/1.2870014 ↗
46. 10.1038/3532810.1038/35328 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.04.01710.1016/j.msea.2011.04.017 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11837-006-0215-510.1007/s11837-006-0215-5 ↗
49. Application of high-pressure torsion to Al-Si alloys with and without scandium additions
50. 10.1063/1.11978510.1063/1.119785 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20050123210.1002/adma.200501232 ↗
52. 10.1557/JMR.1996.023910.1557/JMR.1996.0239 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.08010.1016/j.msea.2007.07.080 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.2210.1103/PhysRevB.60.22 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11661-005-0329-310.1007/s11661-005-0329-3 ↗
56. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00466-410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00466-4 ↗
57. 10.1557/mrc.2013.4010.1557/mrc.2013.40 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
60. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00156-510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00156-5 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.21410.1016/j.msea.2003.10.214 ↗
62. 10.1038/419887a10.1038/419887a ↗
63. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.01810.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.018 ↗
64. The cleavage strength of polycrystals
65. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.00410.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.004 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.02110.1016/j.msea.2008.08.021 ↗
67. 10.1002/adma.20060147210.1002/adma.200601472 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.04010.1016/j.msea.2011.07.040 ↗
69. 10.1080/0141861020823568910.1080/01418610208235689 ↗
70. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)91092-810.1016/0921-5093(94)91092-8 ↗
72. 10.1016/0921-5093(93)90717-S10.1016/0921-5093(93)90717-S ↗
73. 10.1002/adem.20090033510.1002/adem.200900335 ↗
74. 10.1007/BF0035443810.1007/BF00354438 ↗
75. 10.1007/s10853-009-3535-310.1007/s10853-009-3535-3 ↗
76. The effect of grain boundary sliding and strain rate sensitivity on the ductility of ultrafine-grained materials