A new approach of the Oliver and Pharr model to fit the unloading curve from instrumented indentation testing
Source abstract
Abstract
The unloading part of a load–displacement curve from instrumented indentation tests is usually approximated by a power law (Oliver and Pharr model), where the load is the dependent variable. This approach generally fits well the data. Nevertheless, the convergence is occasionally quite questionable. In this regard, we propose a different approach for the Oliver and Pharr model, called the inverted approach, since it assigns the displacement as the dependent variable. Both models were used to fit the unloading curves from nanoindentation tests on fused silica and aluminum, applying a general least squares procedure. Generally, the inverted methodology leads to similar results for the fitting parameters and the elastic modulus (E) when convergence is achieved. Nevertheless, this approach facilitates the convergence, because it is a better conditioned problem. Additionally, by Monte Carlo simulations we found that robustness is improved using the inverted approach, since the estimation ofEis more accurate, especially for aluminum.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.01810.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-810.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-8 ↗
4. 10.1557/JMR.1986.060110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jlap.2004.07.00710.1016/j.jlap.2004.07.007 ↗
6. 38. “JCGM 101:2008-Supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement’-Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method.” [Online]. Available: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed: 27-Feb-2017).
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.01810.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.018 ↗
8. 10.1557/JMR.2003.019410.1557/JMR.2003.0194 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2009.00541.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2009.00541.x ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2002.014410.1557/JMR.2002.0144 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.07.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2007.07.002 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
14. Loubet · 1993 · 429
15. 10.6028/jres.108.02410.6028/jres.108.024 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00174-X10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00174-X ↗
18. Whitehouse · 201010.1201/b10415 ↗
19. 27. 4.1.4.2. Nonlinear Least Squares Regression. [Online]. Available at: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmd/section1/pmd142.htm (accessed: 13-Aug-2016).
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.04910.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.049 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.05.06310.1016/j.tsf.2010.05.063 ↗
22. Bevington · 2003
23. 39. “ISO 14577-1:2015-Metallic materials—Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—Part 1: Test method,” ISO. [Online]. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=56626 (accessed: 04-Sep-2016).
24. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.07610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.076 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.005 ↗
26. 10.1080/0022234990824813110.1080/00222349908248131 ↗
27. Peters · 2001 · 1
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.01910.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.019 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-2 ↗
30. 10.1137/1.978089871957410.1137/1.9780898719574 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.12.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2015.12.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.009 ↗
33. Brown · 200210.2113/8.3.244 ↗
34. Smyth · 2002
35. 10.1137/05062493510.1137/050624935 ↗
36. Erhel · 2012
37. 10.1007/BF0035465510.1007/BF00354655 ↗
38. Madsen · 2004
39. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.10.01710.1016/j.tsf.2012.10.017 ↗
40. 10.1557/JMR.1995.149110.1557/JMR.1995.1491 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗