journal article·2017-09-01

Shear Performance of Pretensioned Concrete I-Girders Employing 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands

Authors not provided

ACI Structural Journal· Volume 114· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Invalid Email Address
Only a short abstract or summary was supplied by the source.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: short

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Salazar, J.; Yousefpour, H.; Katz, A.; Abyaneh, R.; Kim, H.; Garber, D.; Hrynyk, T.; and Bayrak, O., “Benefits of Using 0.7-inch Strands in Precast, Pretensioned Girders: A Parametric Investigation,” PCI Journal, 2017.10.15554/pcij62.6-04 ↗
2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” seventh edition with 2015 and 2016 interim revisions, Washington, DC, 2016, 2150 pp.
4. Hovell, C.; Avendaño, A.; Moore, A.; Dunkman, D.; Bayrak, O.; and Jirsa, J., “Structural Performance of Texas U-Beams at Prestressed Transfer and Under Shear-Critical Loads,” Technical Report, Center for Transportation Research, Austin, TX, 2011, 355 pp.
5. Garber, D. B.; Gallardo, J. M.; Deschenes, D. J.; and Bayrak, O., “Nontraditional Shear Failures in Bulb-T Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 21, No. 7, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000089010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000890 ↗
6. Tadros, M. K., and Morcous, G., “Impact of 0.7 Inch Diameter Strands on NU I-Girders,” Technical Report, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, NE, 2011, 203 pp.
7. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), “Concrete I-Girder Details,” Standard Drawings by the Bridge Division, Austin, TX, 2015, 2 pp.
8. Salazar, J.; Yousefpour, H.; Abyaneh, R.; Kim, H.; Katz, A.; Hrynyk, T.; and Bayrak O., “End-Region Behavior of Pretensioned I-Girders Employing 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) Strands,” ACI Structural Journal, 2017.
9. ASTM C39/C39M-14, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 7 pp.
10. ASTM C469/C469M-14, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 5 pp.
11. ASTM C496/C496M-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 5 pp.
12. ASTM C78/C78M-15, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 4 pp.
13. ASTM A370-16, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 49 pp.
14. ASTM A1061/A1061M-16, “Standard Test Methods for Testing Multi-Wire Steel Prestressing Strand,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 4 pp.
15. Nakamura, E.; Avendaño, A.; and Bayrak, O., “Shear Database for Prestressed Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2013, pp. 909-918.10.14359/51686147 ↗